usrp-users@lists.ettus.com

Discussion and technical support related to USRP, UHD, RFNoC

View all threads

X310

VS
Vladica Sark
Wed, Oct 19, 2016 6:39 PM

Hi Marcus,

Anyway, having a lot of bits on the A/D, solves the problem. I do not
have the optimal gain for each time slot, but that is not a huge
issue. I make only coarse adjustment of the gain, just to avoid
clipping of the signal in any time slot. And of course this is
performed in not used time slots. In semi-static scenarios, this works
well.

Indeed! What are your bandwidths? The ADC of the N210 has nominally
14bits, but of those, roughly 12 are effectively available, but
oversampling usually saves the day and gives you something close to the
full 16 bit of dynamic range the samples going to your PC have. On the
AD936x of the B2xx series, the ADC is less potent, but with appropriate
preselection filtering, the noise figure is probably better than that on
the (a bit dated) XCVR2450's LNA.

I go with the largest bandwidth, i.e. sample rate possible 25MS/s, or in
some cases 50 MS/s (sc8), since the ranging precision is proportional
with the bandwidth. Since I use BPSK, and I use large PN sequences (1024
chips), usually, a few bits are enough. A matched filtering
(correlation) is performed at the receiver, and therefore a few bits for
sampling the signal are enough. Similar to the GPS, where the ADC has 2,
maximum 3 bits.

And yes, the noise figure in the b205 is slightly better.

Best regards,
Vladica

Hi Marcus, >> Anyway, having a lot of bits on the A/D, solves the problem. I do not >> have the optimal gain for each time slot, but that is not a huge >> issue. I make only coarse adjustment of the gain, just to avoid >> clipping of the signal in any time slot. And of course this is >> performed in not used time slots. In semi-static scenarios, this works >> well. > Indeed! What are your bandwidths? The ADC of the N210 has nominally > 14bits, but of those, roughly 12 are effectively available, but > oversampling usually saves the day and gives you something close to the > full 16 bit of dynamic range the samples going to your PC have. On the > AD936x of the B2xx series, the ADC is less potent, but with appropriate > preselection filtering, the noise figure is probably better than that on > the (a bit dated) XCVR2450's LNA. I go with the largest bandwidth, i.e. sample rate possible 25MS/s, or in some cases 50 MS/s (sc8), since the ranging precision is proportional with the bandwidth. Since I use BPSK, and I use large PN sequences (1024 chips), usually, a few bits are enough. A matched filtering (correlation) is performed at the receiver, and therefore a few bits for sampling the signal are enough. Similar to the GPS, where the ADC has 2, maximum 3 bits. And yes, the noise figure in the b205 is slightly better. Best regards, Vladica