time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Lots of Off Topic discussion

AM
Artek Manuals
Sun, Sep 2, 2018 1:53 PM

Does any one know what the line item $$$ amount is for the WWV/WWVB
operating budget?

-DC
NR1DX
manuals@artekmanuals.com

On 9/1/2018 11:59 PM, Peter Laws wrote:

On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 7:25 PM Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

I most certainly have seen an NTP server that ran off of WWVB and relayed
the result to the internet. The fun part was that they had entered the “delay”

I didn't say it COULD not -- W3HCF and his group didn't miss much in
the code -- but what I'm saying is that in 20+ years of dinking with
NTP as part of my job, I HAVE not seen any evidence of WWV being used
as a "refclock".  Certainly not in the last decade.  Maybe there were
many of them when Dr Mills first published the standards and reference
implementation back in the 1980s but not now.

I want to be outraged over this cut but until I have a coherent,
evidence-based argument in favor of keeping the stations, I'm going to
keep my powder dry.

--
Dave
Manuals@ArtekManuals.com
www.ArtekManuals.com


This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Does any one know what the line item $$$ amount is for the WWV/WWVB operating budget? -DC NR1DX manuals@artekmanuals.com On 9/1/2018 11:59 PM, Peter Laws wrote: > On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 7:25 PM Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: > >> I most certainly *have* seen an NTP server that ran off of WWVB and relayed >> the result to the internet. The fun part was that they had entered the “delay” > I didn't say it COULD not -- W3HCF and his group didn't miss much in > the code -- but what I'm saying is that in 20+ years of dinking with > NTP as part of my job, I HAVE not seen any evidence of WWV being used > as a "refclock". Certainly not in the last decade. Maybe there were > many of them when Dr Mills first published the standards and reference > implementation back in the 1980s but not now. > > I want to be outraged over this cut but until I have a coherent, > evidence-based argument in favor of keeping the stations, I'm going to > keep my powder dry. > -- Dave Manuals@ArtekManuals.com www.ArtekManuals.com --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
B
Björn
Sun, Sep 2, 2018 2:18 PM

Hi,

There are LF receivers available commercially today. See links below for one vendor.
https://www.meinbergglobal.com/english/products/pci-express-dcf77-clock.htm

and even an USB version for the NIST signal.

https://www.meinbergglobal.com/english/products/usb-wwvb-clock.htm

And there seems to be options for wwvb reception also in 1u 19” format.

https://www.meinbergglobal.com/english/products/rack-mount-1u-ntp-server.htm

/Björn

Sent from my iPhone

On 2 Sep 2018, at 15:48, Tim Shoppa tshoppa@gmail.com wrote:

Some stats in historic NTP surveys show that WWV and WWVB based refclocks
were relevant 20+ years ago:

1997 - Mills survey - 47 GPS and GOES vs 74 WWV and WWVB.

1999 - Minar MIT survey - 129 GPS and GOES vs 24 WWV and WWVB.

In those two years it is pretty obvious the world was swinging from LF and
HF refclocks to satellite based refclocks (and also obvious that GOES was
declining while GPS was on the upswing.)

As recently as 10 years ago I was running a WWV-based Stratum 1 - it's
there in the 2005 Brazillian NTP survey data.

It would be much easier to make a case for continuing WWV service if there
were commercial WWV based refclocks on the market and used in
commercial/government applications. 10 years ago I could find WWV time
clocks in industrial automation catalogs but today, nothing. I'm sure
there's some installed base.

Tim N3QE

Hi, There are LF receivers available commercially today. See links below for one vendor. https://www.meinbergglobal.com/english/products/pci-express-dcf77-clock.htm and even an USB version for the NIST signal. https://www.meinbergglobal.com/english/products/usb-wwvb-clock.htm And there seems to be options for wwvb reception also in 1u 19” format. https://www.meinbergglobal.com/english/products/rack-mount-1u-ntp-server.htm /Björn Sent from my iPhone > On 2 Sep 2018, at 15:48, Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com> wrote: > > Some stats in historic NTP surveys show that WWV and WWVB based refclocks > were relevant 20+ years ago: > > 1997 - Mills survey - 47 GPS and GOES vs 74 WWV and WWVB. > > 1999 - Minar MIT survey - 129 GPS and GOES vs 24 WWV and WWVB. > > In those two years it is pretty obvious the world was swinging from LF and > HF refclocks to satellite based refclocks (and also obvious that GOES was > declining while GPS was on the upswing.) > > As recently as 10 years ago I was running a WWV-based Stratum 1 - it's > there in the 2005 Brazillian NTP survey data. > > It would be much easier to make a case for continuing WWV service if there > were commercial WWV based refclocks on the market and used in > commercial/government applications. 10 years ago I could find WWV time > clocks in industrial automation catalogs but today, nothing. I'm sure > there's some installed base. > > Tim N3QE
BK
Bob kb8tq
Sun, Sep 2, 2018 2:45 PM

Hi

The referenced line item is $6.8 million a year. It is still very much unclear if that is just WWV(H)
(from the reference it must include them) or if it also includes WWWVB.  Without any clarification,
we are only guessing about WWVB. Given the way the budget process works, there’s never a
lot of clarity at this point.

Bob

On Sep 2, 2018, at 9:53 AM, Artek Manuals Manuals@ArtekManuals.com wrote:

Does any one know what the line item $$$ amount is for the WWV/WWVB operating budget?

-DC
NR1DX
manuals@artekmanuals.com

On 9/1/2018 11:59 PM, Peter Laws wrote:

On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 7:25 PM Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

I most certainly have seen an NTP server that ran off of WWVB and relayed
the result to the internet. The fun part was that they had entered the “delay”

I didn't say it COULD not -- W3HCF and his group didn't miss much in
the code -- but what I'm saying is that in 20+ years of dinking with
NTP as part of my job, I HAVE not seen any evidence of WWV being used
as a "refclock".  Certainly not in the last decade.  Maybe there were
many of them when Dr Mills first published the standards and reference
implementation back in the 1980s but not now.

I want to be outraged over this cut but until I have a coherent,
evidence-based argument in favor of keeping the stations, I'm going to
keep my powder dry.

--
Dave
Manuals@ArtekManuals.com
www.ArtekManuals.com


This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.

Hi The referenced line item is $6.8 million a year. It is still very much unclear if that is just WWV(H) (from the reference it must include them) or if it also includes WWWVB. Without any clarification, we are only guessing about WWVB. Given the way the budget process works, there’s never a lot of clarity at this point. Bob > On Sep 2, 2018, at 9:53 AM, Artek Manuals <Manuals@ArtekManuals.com> wrote: > > Does any one know what the line item $$$ amount is for the WWV/WWVB operating budget? > > -DC > NR1DX > manuals@artekmanuals.com > > On 9/1/2018 11:59 PM, Peter Laws wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 7:25 PM Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: >> >>> I most certainly *have* seen an NTP server that ran off of WWVB and relayed >>> the result to the internet. The fun part was that they had entered the “delay” >> I didn't say it COULD not -- W3HCF and his group didn't miss much in >> the code -- but what I'm saying is that in 20+ years of dinking with >> NTP as part of my job, I HAVE not seen any evidence of WWV being used >> as a "refclock". Certainly not in the last decade. Maybe there were >> many of them when Dr Mills first published the standards and reference >> implementation back in the 1980s but not now. >> >> I want to be outraged over this cut but until I have a coherent, >> evidence-based argument in favor of keeping the stations, I'm going to >> keep my powder dry. >> > > -- > Dave > Manuals@ArtekManuals.com > www.ArtekManuals.com > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com > and follow the instructions there.