Re: [PCW] Re-power with outboards

C
Cybling1@aol.com
Thu, Sep 1, 2005 2:10 AM

In a message dated 8/31/2005 3:48:09 PM Central Daylight Time,
trikini23@trikini.com writes:

would  like to know too. I have had many suzuki's

Captain Len:

See also my earlier response to Gerard.

It now occurs to me that my application (4,000 pound gross center console,
planing hulls) was to get out of Galveston in a hurry to spots 70 miles
offshore, fish like crazy and run back in.  The 140s were being pushed very  hard
and I suspect that my use could have been the cause of some of the  problems.
They were not badly maintained (just the opposite) or  mistreated, just run
hard and fast.  Because the hulls (and passengers)  could take the speed, the
engines may have paid the price, though.

I do think that the fuel injected v-6 is a better all around choice, not  the
least of reasons being the "bottom" of the engine family I referred to in my
earlier post.

Also, sorry to hear of your recent problems.  You certainly have my  best
thoughts coming your way.  I have enjoyed your posts in the past on  this and the
Multihull list.

Best.

Phil.

In a message dated 8/31/2005 3:48:09 PM Central Daylight Time, trikini23@trikini.com writes: would like to know too. I have had many suzuki's Captain Len: See also my earlier response to Gerard. It now occurs to me that my application (4,000 pound gross center console, planing hulls) was to get out of Galveston in a hurry to spots 70 miles offshore, fish like crazy and run back in. The 140s were being pushed very hard and I suspect that my use could have been the cause of some of the problems. They were not badly maintained (just the opposite) or mistreated, just run hard and fast. Because the hulls (and passengers) could take the speed, the engines may have paid the price, though. I do think that the fuel injected v-6 is a better all around choice, not the least of reasons being the "bottom" of the engine family I referred to in my earlier post. Also, sorry to hear of your recent problems. You certainly have my best thoughts coming your way. I have enjoyed your posts in the past on this and the Multihull list. Best. Phil.
CL
Capt. Len
Thu, Sep 1, 2005 11:58 AM

I can see the issue.  The V-4 I have is carburetors and tuning is a
hassle as is adjusting the oil injection.

The 140 on the  excursion ran at about 3600 rpm with a 5000 max

The DT 100 I am running at 4200 with a 5400 max.

Propping it was a real hassle but is on a Power Tri so no precedent.

I always want more power and run at a 80% level.

--
Capt. Len Susman
trikini23@trikini.com
WWW TRIKINI Project
http://www.trikini.com
What's New
http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm

I can see the issue. The V-4 I have is carburetors and tuning is a hassle as is adjusting the oil injection. The 140 on the excursion ran at about 3600 rpm with a 5000 max The DT 100 I am running at 4200 with a 5400 max. Propping it was a real hassle but is on a Power Tri so no precedent. I always want more power and run at a 80% level. -- Capt. Len Susman trikini23@trikini.com WWW TRIKINI Project http://www.trikini.com What's New http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm