talk@lists.collectionspace.org

WE HAVE SUNSET THIS LISTSERV - Join us at collectionspace@lyrasislists.org

View all threads

spatial capacity

RM
Richard Moe
Tue, Jun 29, 2010 11:28 PM

Hi

What will be CSpace's attitude towards spatial queries?
searching on geographic polygons or shapefiles?

Dick Moe

Hi What will be CSpace's attitude towards spatial queries? searching on geographic polygons or shapefiles? Dick Moe
PS
Patrick Schmitz
Wed, Jun 30, 2010 12:12 AM

Hi Dick -

Thanks for the question. The 1.0 release will not include spatial search,
although it should be smart about searching on geographical entities that
contain other entities (e.g., search for things by county would find things
in the contained cities), subject to the hierarchic relationships in the
Place authority.

A high priority moving forward is a move to a PostgreSQL db and support for
OpenGIS (PostGIS) extensions to support proper spatial queries. We've had
some requests from various partners, but we will almost certainly come back
to you with questions about what functionality you need, whether you already
have GIS data and if so, in what form, etc.

Have you already got some specific use-cases you need to be able to satisfy?
Is it more like "find specimens within some distance of a place", or "find
specimens in a known polygon (for a county, region, geographic feature)", or
"find specimens in a polygon I can draw", or something else?

Thanks - Patrick

-----Original Message-----
From: talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org
[mailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org] On Behalf Of
Richard Moe
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 4:28 PM
To: talk@lists.collectionspace.org
Subject: [Talk] spatial capacity

Hi

What will be CSpace's attitude towards spatial queries?
searching on geographic polygons or shapefiles?

Dick Moe


Talk mailing list
Talk@lists.collectionspace.org
http://lists.collectionspace.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_lists.c
ollectionspace.org

Hi Dick - Thanks for the question. The 1.0 release will not include spatial search, although it should be smart about searching on geographical entities that contain other entities (e.g., search for things by county would find things in the contained cities), subject to the hierarchic relationships in the Place authority. A high priority moving forward is a move to a PostgreSQL db and support for OpenGIS (PostGIS) extensions to support proper spatial queries. We've had some requests from various partners, but we will almost certainly come back to you with questions about what functionality you need, whether you already have GIS data and if so, in what form, etc. Have you already got some specific use-cases you need to be able to satisfy? Is it more like "find specimens within some distance of a place", or "find specimens in a known polygon (for a county, region, geographic feature)", or "find specimens in a polygon I can draw", or something else? Thanks - Patrick > -----Original Message----- > From: talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org > [mailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org] On Behalf Of > Richard Moe > Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 4:28 PM > To: talk@lists.collectionspace.org > Subject: [Talk] spatial capacity > > Hi > > What will be CSpace's attitude towards spatial queries? > searching on geographic polygons or shapefiles? > > Dick Moe > > _______________________________________________ > Talk mailing list > Talk@lists.collectionspace.org > http://lists.collectionspace.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_lists.c > ollectionspace.org >