time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: [time-nuts] Broken Ovenaire OSC 85-50

JL
J. L. Trantham
Sat, Jul 4, 2009 12:25 PM

Well, I actually did increase the input voltage so that the Oscillator Board
saw 5 VDC instead of about 2.5 VDC and it made little difference in the
output amplitude, perhaps 10% or less.  I am sorry, but my 'scientific
method' has not regenerated itself sufficiently to drive me to make careful
notes.

Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of WB6BNQ
Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 9:20 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Broken Ovenaire OSC 85-50

I agree with Warren.  The VCC seems way too low.  Interestingly, noone else
seems to think so, or did not notice it.

Bill....WB6BNQ

WarrenS wrote:

Here is my  two cents worth
20 mv output, sure sounds like something is broken.
It should be fixed before it is modified.
The 2.49 volts on the Red input voltage seem LOW, More Vcc maybe. The
"Grn" labeled wire, FreqCtrl  input should be about 1/2 VCC  for
testing. If you do 'need' to modify the gain, It would seem better to
bypass the 470 ohm resistor with a cap in series with the 47 ohms.

ws


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Well, I actually did increase the input voltage so that the Oscillator Board saw 5 VDC instead of about 2.5 VDC and it made little difference in the output amplitude, perhaps 10% or less. I am sorry, but my 'scientific method' has not regenerated itself sufficiently to drive me to make careful notes. Joe -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of WB6BNQ Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 9:20 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Broken Ovenaire OSC 85-50 I agree with Warren. The VCC seems way too low. Interestingly, noone else seems to think so, or did not notice it. Bill....WB6BNQ WarrenS wrote: > Here is my two cents worth > 20 mv output, sure sounds like something is broken. > It should be fixed before it is modified. > The 2.49 volts on the Red input voltage seem LOW, More Vcc maybe. The > "Grn" labeled wire, FreqCtrl input should be about 1/2 VCC for > testing. If you do 'need' to modify the gain, It would seem better to > bypass the 470 ohm resistor with a cap in series with the 47 ohms. > > ws _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
JL
J. L. Trantham
Sat, Jul 4, 2009 2:16 PM

What a wealth of new thought.  Let me see if I can remember all the
questions asked in prior posts.

First, the unit is Option 004 for the HP5316A and B (and perhaps others)
frequency counter and some information about it can be found in the service
manual here:  http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/05316-90011.pdf

Second, mentioned in my original posts and probably not emphasized enough
recently is the fact that there is an Oven Controller Board attached to the
oven that is connected to the Red wire, the Black wire and the Red/White
wire.  I disconnected the Red wire from the Oven Controller Board and saw no
significant change in the voltage on the Red wire.

Third, the unit does adjust frequency with both the COARSE and FINE
adjustments (Cap and Green wire) and does come spot on frequency as compared
to my Thunderbolt.  It is quite stable as observed overnight on a scope with
the appearance of being with in 1 Hz after an overnight.  It may well
improve with longer 'warm up'.  Sorry, no phase noise measurements but I am
working on adding that to my repertoire.

As shown in the manual, there is an external board that connects to the
85-50 with three wires supplying regulated +5VDC, ground, and a connection
for the 10MHz out with a 100 ohm resistor to ground on that connection on
the external board (which I don't think I have mentioned before).

Forth, I did make one error in component value that is now corrected on the
most recent schematic and that is the 8.2K resistor connected to the base of
the oscillator transistor I originally miss read as a 1.2K.  I suspect that
Bruce's original analysis used 1.2K as the value of this resistor.
Component values were obtained by using a magnifying glass to read the
values or color codes then verified by using an LCR meter (4274A or
SmartTweezer) or Fluke 8050A DMM.  I wish I had a 'should be' schematic
(anyone with a connection to OAC that could help with this?).  All I could
do was to 'derive' the schematic you have.  The pot measured 4.7K.  I do not
know what it 'should be'.

I did obtain the DC and RF voltages in stages as I progressed through the
repair effort and my original schematic did not include all these
measurements.

The DC voltages were measured with the 8050A and the RF voltages with a TEK
485 and a 10:1 probe.  The only component value I found 'out of range' was
the .01 uF cap on the 330 ohm resistor in the emitter circuit of the output
transistor on the Output Board and replacing it provided only 20%
improvement in amplitude.

All measurements were made with the oscillator oscillating and before any
effort at repair.  I did not go back and remeasure DC or RF voltages after
replacing the 470 ohm resistor with a 47 ohm resistor.

I must admit, I overlooked the low voltage at the bottom of the 4.7K pot.
Perhaps I made an error in measurement but it does serve it's function.
Perhaps there is a leaky .01 uF bypass cap on the Green wire on the
Oscillator Board that I missed but I do not see how that might cause a low
output amplitude.  The 100K resistor measured correct and that should limit
current there to the 15 uA range.

Fifth, unfortunately, I do not have any 'spare' 10 MHz crystals and I did
not think of substituting a different crystal.

Sixth, I was wondering about the AGC issue and the only thought I had was
that the 510 ohm resistor dropping the voltage to the Oscillator Board
somehow might serve that function.  However, raising that voltage to 5 volts
made no difference in output amplitude.

Lastly, the only part of the 85-50 that is not shown is the Oven Controller
Board.  It seemed to be functioning normally based on current measurements
as the oven warmed up and the fact that the unit would come on frequency and
was stable.  It would be quite the challenge to disassemble that unit
without risk of destroying the oven.  As I noted above, the Red, the Black,
and the Red/White wire connect to the Oven Controller Board but the Green
and Yellow wires do not.

My hope was to create a resource for anyone else looking for help in fixing
this unit and it appears that there is quite the wealth of information here.
If anyone has a site and would like to have the schematics and pictures I
have, I would be happy to upload them.

Thanks again for all the information.

Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of WarrenS
Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2009 5:06 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Broken Ovenaire OSC 85-50

Here is a new observation about low Vcc.
It is not likely that the Osc Vcc voltage and the Varicap freq control
voltage is coming from the same 510 Ohm resistor without a regulator.
Something is missing on the schematic, because now any Osc current change
would cause the freq to change. And there is the missing 3 plus ma that can
not be accounted for in your voltage measurements. The Osc and pot circuits
as shown are drawing about 1.5 ma, and there seems to be almost 5ma going
thru the 510 ohm. My guess is that this is from a 2.50 volt precision shunt
regulator on the Vcc, in the Osc oven, but not shown on the schematic. That
should be pretty easy to find. If so, make sure your 47 ohm fix does not
cause the 2.490 volts to loose its regulation when the circuit is put back
in the oven. The increase temp will cause the osc current to increase.

If  the EFC pot is really 10K ohm end to end, that would account for the
other strange voltage readings.

Also if the Freq as small as it is,  is still correct,  that would eliminate
most of the bad xtral possibilities.

ws

What a wealth of new thought. Let me see if I can remember all the questions asked in prior posts. First, the unit is Option 004 for the HP5316A and B (and perhaps others) frequency counter and some information about it can be found in the service manual here: http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/05316-90011.pdf Second, mentioned in my original posts and probably not emphasized enough recently is the fact that there is an Oven Controller Board attached to the oven that is connected to the Red wire, the Black wire and the Red/White wire. I disconnected the Red wire from the Oven Controller Board and saw no significant change in the voltage on the Red wire. Third, the unit does adjust frequency with both the COARSE and FINE adjustments (Cap and Green wire) and does come spot on frequency as compared to my Thunderbolt. It is quite stable as observed overnight on a scope with the appearance of being with in 1 Hz after an overnight. It may well improve with longer 'warm up'. Sorry, no phase noise measurements but I am working on adding that to my repertoire. As shown in the manual, there is an external board that connects to the 85-50 with three wires supplying regulated +5VDC, ground, and a connection for the 10MHz out with a 100 ohm resistor to ground on that connection on the external board (which I don't think I have mentioned before). Forth, I did make one error in component value that is now corrected on the most recent schematic and that is the 8.2K resistor connected to the base of the oscillator transistor I originally miss read as a 1.2K. I suspect that Bruce's original analysis used 1.2K as the value of this resistor. Component values were obtained by using a magnifying glass to read the values or color codes then verified by using an LCR meter (4274A or SmartTweezer) or Fluke 8050A DMM. I wish I had a 'should be' schematic (anyone with a connection to OAC that could help with this?). All I could do was to 'derive' the schematic you have. The pot measured 4.7K. I do not know what it 'should be'. I did obtain the DC and RF voltages in stages as I progressed through the repair effort and my original schematic did not include all these measurements. The DC voltages were measured with the 8050A and the RF voltages with a TEK 485 and a 10:1 probe. The only component value I found 'out of range' was the .01 uF cap on the 330 ohm resistor in the emitter circuit of the output transistor on the Output Board and replacing it provided only 20% improvement in amplitude. All measurements were made with the oscillator oscillating and before any effort at repair. I did not go back and remeasure DC or RF voltages after replacing the 470 ohm resistor with a 47 ohm resistor. I must admit, I overlooked the low voltage at the bottom of the 4.7K pot. Perhaps I made an error in measurement but it does serve it's function. Perhaps there is a leaky .01 uF bypass cap on the Green wire on the Oscillator Board that I missed but I do not see how that might cause a low output amplitude. The 100K resistor measured correct and that should limit current there to the 15 uA range. Fifth, unfortunately, I do not have any 'spare' 10 MHz crystals and I did not think of substituting a different crystal. Sixth, I was wondering about the AGC issue and the only thought I had was that the 510 ohm resistor dropping the voltage to the Oscillator Board somehow might serve that function. However, raising that voltage to 5 volts made no difference in output amplitude. Lastly, the only part of the 85-50 that is not shown is the Oven Controller Board. It seemed to be functioning normally based on current measurements as the oven warmed up and the fact that the unit would come on frequency and was stable. It would be quite the challenge to disassemble that unit without risk of destroying the oven. As I noted above, the Red, the Black, and the Red/White wire connect to the Oven Controller Board but the Green and Yellow wires do not. My hope was to create a resource for anyone else looking for help in fixing this unit and it appears that there is quite the wealth of information here. If anyone has a site and would like to have the schematics and pictures I have, I would be happy to upload them. Thanks again for all the information. Joe -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of WarrenS Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2009 5:06 AM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Broken Ovenaire OSC 85-50 Here is a new observation about low Vcc. It is not likely that the Osc Vcc voltage and the Varicap freq control voltage is coming from the same 510 Ohm resistor without a regulator. Something is missing on the schematic, because now any Osc current change would cause the freq to change. And there is the missing 3 plus ma that can not be accounted for in your voltage measurements. The Osc and pot circuits as shown are drawing about 1.5 ma, and there seems to be almost 5ma going thru the 510 ohm. My guess is that this is from a 2.50 volt precision shunt regulator on the Vcc, in the Osc oven, but not shown on the schematic. That should be pretty easy to find. If so, make sure your 47 ohm fix does not cause the 2.490 volts to loose its regulation when the circuit is put back in the oven. The increase temp will cause the osc current to increase. If the EFC pot is really 10K ohm end to end, that would account for the other strange voltage readings. Also if the Freq as small as it is, is still correct, that would eliminate most of the bad xtral possibilities. ws
PN
Pascal Nguyen
Sun, Jul 5, 2009 9:47 AM

Hi Joe

I am just a radio amateur and I build a lot of oscillators for my need,
including a GPSDO "tunable" with CW25-TIM GPS receiver chip set. Please
allow me to share my usual  trouble shooting when oscillator is not working
properly.
I see an oscillator is just only a high gain amplifier with  positive feed
back via "narrow band pass" filtering to sustain an oscillation in a
controllable manner.
I had a look at your circuit with all Vcbe of all transistors transcribed,
it seems to me all transistors are within normal limit (bias # 0v7).
Please look at the "narrow filter", my suggestion is to check this circuit.

  1. 22pF in parallel with a serial (10uH - 30pF) is a  diplexer, high
    impedance to ground for 10 MHz and low impedance to ground for unwanted
    spectrum.
  2. 80 pF feed back capacitor.
  3. 10 MHz Xtal

Now I can perform a differential diagnosis:

All transistors are correctly biased, can eliminated fault from power supply
and transistors.

A quick and dirty approach is to do a loose coupling (capacitor or inductor)
with the 10 uH inductor, connect to an external 10 MHz variable output
source, check gain of all transistor stages to the last output

Check high impedance to ground for 10 MHz, disconnect the "diplexer", check
magnitude of output signal, signal is increasing, hurray we see the problem.

Same signal level, put the diplexer back to the circuit, check the 80 pF
cap, all else failed, the last component of the "narrow filter" is the Xtal.

Good luck

Pascal Nguyen
vk2ihl / xv2pn

Hi Joe I am just a radio amateur and I build a lot of oscillators for my need, including a GPSDO "tunable" with CW25-TIM GPS receiver chip set. Please allow me to share my usual trouble shooting when oscillator is not working properly. I see an oscillator is just only a high gain amplifier with positive feed back via "narrow band pass" filtering to sustain an oscillation in a controllable manner. I had a look at your circuit with all Vcbe of all transistors transcribed, it seems to me all transistors are within normal limit (bias # 0v7). Please look at the "narrow filter", my suggestion is to check this circuit. 1) 22pF in parallel with a serial (10uH - 30pF) is a diplexer, high impedance to ground for 10 MHz and low impedance to ground for unwanted spectrum. 2) 80 pF feed back capacitor. 3) 10 MHz Xtal Now I can perform a differential diagnosis: All transistors are correctly biased, can eliminated fault from power supply and transistors. A quick and dirty approach is to do a loose coupling (capacitor or inductor) with the 10 uH inductor, connect to an external 10 MHz variable output source, check gain of all transistor stages to the last output Check high impedance to ground for 10 MHz, disconnect the "diplexer", check magnitude of output signal, signal is increasing, hurray we see the problem. Same signal level, put the diplexer back to the circuit, check the 80 pF cap, all else failed, the last component of the "narrow filter" is the Xtal. Good luck Pascal Nguyen vk2ihl / xv2pn
BG
Bruce Griffiths
Sun, Jul 5, 2009 10:07 AM

Pascal Nguyen wrote:

Hi Joe

I am just a radio amateur and I build a lot of oscillators for my need,
including a GPSDO "tunable" with CW25-TIM GPS receiver chip set. Please
allow me to share my usual  trouble shooting when oscillator is not working
properly.
I see an oscillator is just only a high gain amplifier with  positive feed
back via "narrow band pass" filtering to sustain an oscillation in a
controllable manner.
I had a look at your circuit with all Vcbe of all transistors transcribed,
it seems to me all transistors are within normal limit (bias # 0v7).
Please look at the "narrow filter", my suggestion is to check this circuit.

  1. 22pF in parallel with a serial (10uH - 30pF) is a  diplexer, high
    impedance to ground for 10 MHz and low impedance to ground for unwanted
    spectrum.

A poor description that misses the function of this inductor entirely,
such a network acts as a mode suppressor by making the impedance to
ground inductive for the crystal mode that is being suppressed. If one
of the  2 feedback capacitors in the Colpitts oscillator is replaced by
an C || (L+C) network oscillation won't occur in the frequency range for
which that network is inductive.

  1. 80 pF feed back capacitor.
  2. 10 MHz Xtal

Now I can perform a differential diagnosis:

All transistors are correctly biased, can eliminated fault from power supply
and transistors.

A quick and dirty approach is to do a loose coupling (capacitor or inductor)
with the 10 uH inductor, connect to an external 10 MHz variable output
source, check gain of all transistor stages to the last output

Check high impedance to ground for 10 MHz, disconnect the "diplexer", check
magnitude of output signal, signal is increasing, hurray we see the problem.

Bad idea, the (overtone??) crystal will then probably oscillate at the
frequency of the mode that this network is intended to suppress.
Better (if possible) to actually measure the impedance of this network
as a function of frequency to check that its has the required
characteristic.

As far as I can deduce this circuit limits the amplitude by having the
oscillator transistor saturate for a part of the oscillation cycle.
Its better to use transistor cutoff as the limiting mechanism as its
quieter.
However this requires a larger oscillator transistor Vcb than is used in
this circuit.

Excessive loss in the frequency determining network or a lossy varicap
or circuit board can significantly reduce the crystal current to well
below the design value.

Same signal level, put the diplexer back to the circuit, check the 80 pF
cap, all else failed, the last component of the "narrow filter" is the Xtal.

Good luck

Pascal Nguyen
vk2ihl / xv2pn


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Bruce

Pascal Nguyen wrote: > Hi Joe > > I am just a radio amateur and I build a lot of oscillators for my need, > including a GPSDO "tunable" with CW25-TIM GPS receiver chip set. Please > allow me to share my usual trouble shooting when oscillator is not working > properly. > I see an oscillator is just only a high gain amplifier with positive feed > back via "narrow band pass" filtering to sustain an oscillation in a > controllable manner. > I had a look at your circuit with all Vcbe of all transistors transcribed, > it seems to me all transistors are within normal limit (bias # 0v7). > Please look at the "narrow filter", my suggestion is to check this circuit. > 1) 22pF in parallel with a serial (10uH - 30pF) is a diplexer, high > impedance to ground for 10 MHz and low impedance to ground for unwanted > spectrum. > A poor description that misses the function of this inductor entirely, such a network acts as a mode suppressor by making the impedance to ground inductive for the crystal mode that is being suppressed. If one of the 2 feedback capacitors in the Colpitts oscillator is replaced by an C || (L+C) network oscillation won't occur in the frequency range for which that network is inductive. > 2) 80 pF feed back capacitor. > 3) 10 MHz Xtal > > Now I can perform a differential diagnosis: > > All transistors are correctly biased, can eliminated fault from power supply > and transistors. > > A quick and dirty approach is to do a loose coupling (capacitor or inductor) > with the 10 uH inductor, connect to an external 10 MHz variable output > source, check gain of all transistor stages to the last output > > Check high impedance to ground for 10 MHz, disconnect the "diplexer", check > magnitude of output signal, signal is increasing, hurray we see the problem. > > Bad idea, the (overtone??) crystal will then probably oscillate at the frequency of the mode that this network is intended to suppress. Better (if possible) to actually measure the impedance of this network as a function of frequency to check that its has the required characteristic. As far as I can deduce this circuit limits the amplitude by having the oscillator transistor saturate for a part of the oscillation cycle. Its better to use transistor cutoff as the limiting mechanism as its quieter. However this requires a larger oscillator transistor Vcb than is used in this circuit. Excessive loss in the frequency determining network or a lossy varicap or circuit board can significantly reduce the crystal current to well below the design value. > Same signal level, put the diplexer back to the circuit, check the 80 pF > cap, all else failed, the last component of the "narrow filter" is the Xtal. > > > Good luck > > Pascal Nguyen > vk2ihl / xv2pn > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > Bruce
PN
Pascal Nguyen
Sun, Jul 5, 2009 8:51 PM

Hi Joe

Please open the link below

http://www.airlab.com.au/nuts/joe_1.htm

for an update of a simulated fault from an out of tune of the narrow band
pass filter

Kind regards

Pascal Nguyen

Hi Joe Please open the link below http://www.airlab.com.au/nuts/joe_1.htm for an update of a simulated fault from an out of tune of the narrow band pass filter Kind regards Pascal Nguyen
BG
Bruce Griffiths
Sun, Jul 5, 2009 10:08 PM

Pascal

There is also a parallel resonance in the L2 C6 C7 network.
Plus several self resonances in L2.
To get a more complete picture you need to also include the phase shift
and gain over a wide band as the phase shift determines whether
oscillation is possible when the loop gain is greater than 1.

Bruce

Pascal Nguyen wrote:

Hi Joe

Please open the link below

http://www.airlab.com.au/nuts/joe_1.htm

for an update of a simulated fault from an out of tune of the narrow band
pass filter

Kind regards

Pascal Nguyen


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Pascal There is also a parallel resonance in the L2 C6 C7 network. Plus several self resonances in L2. To get a more complete picture you need to also include the phase shift and gain over a wide band as the phase shift determines whether oscillation is possible when the loop gain is greater than 1. Bruce Pascal Nguyen wrote: > Hi Joe > > Please open the link below > > http://www.airlab.com.au/nuts/joe_1.htm > > for an update of a simulated fault from an out of tune of the narrow band > pass filter > > Kind regards > > Pascal Nguyen > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > >
BG
Bruce Griffiths
Sun, Jul 5, 2009 11:55 PM

Pascal Nguyen wrote:

Hi Joe

Please open the link below

http://www.airlab.com.au/nuts/joe_1.htm

for an update of a simulated fault from an out of tune of the narrow band
pass filter

Kind regards

Pascal Nguyen


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Pascal

On a closer look your simulation has very little value at all.
If one is using an AC analysis its far more informative to open the
feedback loop an inject a signal to measure the loop gain and phase.
One then has sufficient information to determine if the oscillator has
sufficient gain and an aprpriate phase shift for oscillation to occur at
a given frequency.
Your analysis injects an external signal whilst leaving the oscillator
feedback loop closed - not helpful or particularly useful at all.

If one wishes to simulate the actual output amplitude, then no extra
source is required with a good simulator the oscillator will oscillate
and limit.
With the relatively low Q for the the crystal you have assumed the
oscillator will start and limit within a reasonable time without
problems as long as you dont use to short a minimum time step.

You have also assumed a fundamental crystal, an overtone crystal with a
somewaht higher ESR than 7 ohms is far more likely to have been used,
but without measuring the actual crystal one cannot be certain.

Bruce

Pascal Nguyen wrote: > Hi Joe > > Please open the link below > > http://www.airlab.com.au/nuts/joe_1.htm > > for an update of a simulated fault from an out of tune of the narrow band > pass filter > > Kind regards > > Pascal Nguyen > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > Pascal On a closer look your simulation has very little value at all. If one is using an AC analysis its far more informative to open the feedback loop an inject a signal to measure the loop gain and phase. One then has sufficient information to determine if the oscillator has sufficient gain and an aprpriate phase shift for oscillation to occur at a given frequency. Your analysis injects an external signal whilst leaving the oscillator feedback loop closed - not helpful or particularly useful at all. If one wishes to simulate the actual output amplitude, then no extra source is required with a good simulator the oscillator will oscillate and limit. With the relatively low Q for the the crystal you have assumed the oscillator will start and limit within a reasonable time without problems as long as you dont use to short a minimum time step. You have also assumed a fundamental crystal, an overtone crystal with a somewaht higher ESR than 7 ohms is far more likely to have been used, but without measuring the actual crystal one cannot be certain. Bruce
JL
J. L. Trantham
Mon, Jul 6, 2009 1:12 AM

Bruce, Pascal, and anyone else,

Stanley Reynolds has hosted my pictures of the unit as well as the
schematic.

The link is here:  http://www.n4iqt.com/JLTrantham/85-50/

Hopefully, this will be helpful to someone in the future.

I appreciate all the effort everyone has put into this and it will take me
months to 'digest' all the information.

I put the counter to work today and it functioned well.  I am going to leave
it on for about a week and see where the oscillator is.  I will try to bring
it on frequency after it has been on for 24 - 48 hours then let it run.

I have 3 of these, all with Option 004 and we will see where they are at the
end of a week or so.

Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Bruce Griffiths
Sent: Sunday, July 05, 2009 6:56 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Broken Ovenaire OSC 85-50

Pascal Nguyen wrote:

Hi Joe

Please open the link below

http://www.airlab.com.au/nuts/joe_1.htm

for an update of a simulated fault from an out of tune of the narrow
band pass filter

Kind regards

Pascal Nguyen


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Pascal

On a closer look your simulation has very little value at all. If one is
using an AC analysis its far more informative to open the feedback loop an
inject a signal to measure the loop gain and phase. One then has sufficient
information to determine if the oscillator has sufficient gain and an
aprpriate phase shift for oscillation to occur at a given frequency. Your
analysis injects an external signal whilst leaving the oscillator feedback
loop closed - not helpful or particularly useful at all.

If one wishes to simulate the actual output amplitude, then no extra source
is required with a good simulator the oscillator will oscillate and limit.
With the relatively low Q for the the crystal you have assumed the
oscillator will start and limit within a reasonable time without problems as
long as you dont use to short a minimum time step.

You have also assumed a fundamental crystal, an overtone crystal with a
somewaht higher ESR than 7 ohms is far more likely to have been used, but
without measuring the actual crystal one cannot be certain.

Bruce


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Bruce, Pascal, and anyone else, Stanley Reynolds has hosted my pictures of the unit as well as the schematic. The link is here: http://www.n4iqt.com/JLTrantham/85-50/ Hopefully, this will be helpful to someone in the future. I appreciate all the effort everyone has put into this and it will take me months to 'digest' all the information. I put the counter to work today and it functioned well. I am going to leave it on for about a week and see where the oscillator is. I will try to bring it on frequency after it has been on for 24 - 48 hours then let it run. I have 3 of these, all with Option 004 and we will see where they are at the end of a week or so. Joe -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Bruce Griffiths Sent: Sunday, July 05, 2009 6:56 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Broken Ovenaire OSC 85-50 Pascal Nguyen wrote: > Hi Joe > > Please open the link below > > http://www.airlab.com.au/nuts/joe_1.htm > > for an update of a simulated fault from an out of tune of the narrow > band pass filter > > Kind regards > > Pascal Nguyen > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > Pascal On a closer look your simulation has very little value at all. If one is using an AC analysis its far more informative to open the feedback loop an inject a signal to measure the loop gain and phase. One then has sufficient information to determine if the oscillator has sufficient gain and an aprpriate phase shift for oscillation to occur at a given frequency. Your analysis injects an external signal whilst leaving the oscillator feedback loop closed - not helpful or particularly useful at all. If one wishes to simulate the actual output amplitude, then no extra source is required with a good simulator the oscillator will oscillate and limit. With the relatively low Q for the the crystal you have assumed the oscillator will start and limit within a reasonable time without problems as long as you dont use to short a minimum time step. You have also assumed a fundamental crystal, an overtone crystal with a somewaht higher ESR than 7 ohms is far more likely to have been used, but without measuring the actual crystal one cannot be certain. Bruce _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.