Cruising Fleet Statistics

LL
Lee Luce
Wed, Mar 27, 2013 2:49 AM

To All -

Attached are the racing statistics from 2012 for our Cruising Fleet.

Some highlights:

There were 50 races scheduled, but only 28 races were completed (not
including HRYRA events).

Eighteen races were canceled due to no wind, or bad weather.

Four race days had good wind, but no Cruising Fleet boats showed up on the
starting line.

The A Division spinnaker boats raced only on Wednesdays. If they raced on
Sundays it was in the non-spinnaker divisions.

All races had a minimum of three boats on the starting line.

Fifteen boats raced on Sundays, 27 boats raced on Wednesdays. Four boats who
raced on Sundays did not race on Wednesdays.

Ten boats were listed in the spinnaker A Division, thus a DNC (Did not
Compete) = 11.

Fifteen boats were listed in the non-spinnaker C Division (PHRF < 187), thus
a DNC = 16.

Six boats were listed in the non-spinnaker D Division (PHRF > 187), thus a
DNC = 7.

Racing Frequency

As you can see from the data, the highest frequency of racing was in the D
Division (64%); the lowest frequency of racing was in the spinnaker A
Division (41%).

Only three boats attained 60% or greater frequency of racing.

The average frequency of racing was: A Division -  23.9%, C Division 30.0%,
D Division 45.8%.

Nine boats (out of 31) raced in less than 5 races. Those boats with the
smallest racing percentage were all in the spinnaker A Division because they
did not race on Sundays.

Lee's recommendations (for what it's worth)

  1. Honor and use the U.S. Racing Rules of Sailing for scoring. 
    
  2. Request all racers register by getting a PHRF before May 1st, and
    

announce the PHRF scoring divisions before the first race on May 5th.
(Suggestion: within the non-spinnaker group, three divisions might be
considered for smaller divisions to improve competition, not two.)

  1. Require all scored racers to be paid members of the Cruising Fleet by
    

the time they start racing.

  1. According to the NBC Sailing Instructions, three boats must race to
    

have a fleet start. (Less than three boats on the starting line must start
with the Open Fleet.) As in the past, if three boats race but only one
completes the course in the allotted time, all boats are scored. Likewise,
if only one boat completes the race course, that boat receives a score and
is not penalized because no other competitor shows up. In other words, while
you need three boats to have a starting gun from the race Committee, only
one boat needs to run the course for the race to count.

  1. A boat should complete a minimum of 10% of the races scheduled to be
    

considered a registered boat. Remember, the lower the percentage, the more
you encourage racers to come out and try.

  1. Boats that compete in HRYRA races may receive an average of their
    

annual scores at NBC for the races missed at Nyack, if a Nyack race is held.
The Around Long Island Race should not be considered part of the Nyack
racing venue, and boats competing in that race should not receive an average
of their score.

  1. Skippers that volunteer time on the Race Committee and Race Patrol,
    

not as part of their Club duty obligation, may receive an average of their
annual score for that race.

  1. As proposed, the annual Club trophy should be determined by
    

performance in all Cruising Fleet venues for 2013 including Sunday, Regatta,
and Wednesday Night racing. Plus see #6 above for HRYRA racing to be
included.

  1. In addition, Fleet trophies should be awarded for Sunday, Wednesday
    

Night, Spring Series and Fall Series competitions.

I notice that most of these e-mails below strongly represent members who
race (or crew) in the spinnaker A Division, roughly one-third of those who
race in the Cruising fleet. Could it be that these members pull their crew
from one-design racers in the Club, and so have a vested interest in not
racing on weekends? If this observation offends, I apologize. But one would
be remiss not to mention it.

Lee Luce

Cruising Fleet Secretary

From: Carmen and Ruth Yannelli [mailto:ruthcarm@optonline.net]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 10:19 PM
To: 'Eric Baumes'; luce01@optonline.net; 'Gary Tenenbaum'; 'Osman Kurtulus';
'Cruising Fleet Racers'
Subject: RE: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for Cruising Fleet

A couple of thoughts, I like the idea of a boat having to compete in a
minimum number of races to be scored for the overall trophy.  I also like
the idea of a minimum number of boats on the line for a race to count
towards the season standings.  I would suggest a 60/40  rule,  you have to
race in 60% of the races in order to be counted in the scoring and a race
will only count if 40% of the fleet (those that raced in 60% of the races)
showed up.  This could lead to a lot of suspense at the end of the season
trying to figure out who won the award,  but we have a few months to figure
it out...  This solves a couple of problems without setting things in stone.
The debate over which races to include goes away,  if boats show up on a
given day the race counts,  if they don't show up it does not count. It's
very simple and reflects the will of the fleet to show up and race.  I think
in the long run this would build participation in Sundays, maybe not
everyone at once,  but a few boats at a time. The other problem solved is
the penalty for missing a race. Assume that 10 boats race over the course of
the season in a given fleet,  but 4 of them only race in a handful of races.
The penalty for missing a race would be 6 + 1 not 10 +1, because boats 7, 8,
9 and 10 would not be counted towards the overall scoring.

As far as the PHRF certificates and fleet membership are concerned,  out of
courtesy to the sucker who has to handle all of the scoring,  get your PHRF
certificates and pay your fleet dues before the season begins.  It only
creates more work for the guy that's volunteering his time to do the
scoring.

Lastly,  as far as HRYRA and other races (ALIR/Vineyard/etc) are concerned,
I feel that we should be supporting the folks who are trying to step up
their game and are representing our club in these events.  Consider giving
an average score for a boat that ventures out to these venues.  Other fleets
in the club do the same thing for boats that are traveling.  You could also
count these boats towards the minimum on any given day and may find out that
more races count because we are including more boats in the scoring.

Carmen

From: Wednightracing
[mailto:wednightracing-bounces@maillist.nyackboatclub.org] On Behalf Of Eric
Baumes
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 6:40 PM
To: luce01@optonline.net; Gary Tenenbaum; Osman Kurtulus; Cruising Fleet
Racers
Subject: Re: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for Cruising Fleet

As Gary pointed out we can modify Appendix A at will we do it all the time.
I think anyone last year could have asked for redress in scoring as boats
that did not "register" regularly sailed and were scored.

As for Wed vs. Sun vs. Holiday regattas I think tradition has to look at
reality. 3-4x more boats race wednesday than Sunday and the turnout for
Holiday regattas for cruising boats is not any better. Tradition is great,
but the shift towards weekday vespers series for big boat racing is a
national phenomenon. Economics, shifting demographics and family commitments
are changing the nature of the sport and how people play it. We can either
change with the times or continue fight it.

I have raced on and off on sundays at the club since 2004, and there have
never been more than a handful of boats on the line. When I was racing with
Jack Yates, often time is was just us and Lipscomb. I think we should have a
cruising start on Sunday, but I don't know if it is what people think of
when they think of cruising fleet (PHRF) racing at the club. Perhaps we
should listen to the numbers and the participants.

Finally I take umbrage at the insinuation that I would score counter to the
RRS as modified by the NoR or SIs. I am however as far as I know still
entitled to an opinion.

Sincerely,

E. A. Baumes

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:29 PM, luce01@optonline.net wrote:

Eric -

I would like to point out that if you, as appointed head scorer, insist on
"I am for counting DNC and DNS the same per Osman's recommendation" then
any racer may legitimately protest and request the race results be thrown
out because the scoring does not conform to the Racing Rules of Sailing. The
SIs are clear that we sail under the RRS, but the fleets are responsible for
their own scoring. That doesn't mean anyone has authority to change the
rules at will.

You are, of course, correct that the PHRF divisions last year were horribly
out of whack leading to great scoring inequities, especially in the C
division. I strongly suggest that attention be paid to a more equal set of
PHRF divisions (for example, no more than 8 boats per division), and that
the fleet decide the minimum number of races a boat must complete to be
counted in series scoring. These rules should be in effect before the start
of the racing season.

I am quite pained that anyone would think that regatta or Sunday racing
should not be taken seriously. This is the heart, and historic core-being,
of our Club. You must remember than some members work during the week and
can't make a 6:30 pm start time on Wednesday nights. But most people can
race on Sundays if they choose.

Lee

----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Baumes
Date: Monday, March 25, 2013 1:47 pm
Subject: Re: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for Cruising Fleet

To: David Otterbein
Cc: wednightracing@nyackboatclub.org,
wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org

My 2 cents.

One of the problems we have with scoring the long series is the
fact that
many boats show up for a race or two, then don't come back. Or boats
register for the 'series' then don't race.

What then happens is the DNC - number of registrants plus one
can become an
onerous penalty. If you exceed throw outs and miss an extra race the
penalty can be something crazy like14, when normally half that
number of
boats race.

As we don't have or enforce a rigorous registration process I am for
counting DNC and DNS the same per Osman's recommendation.

As it stands now, I don't think anyone who is actually serious
about racing
takes any of the Over all cruising fleet trophies seriously.
Most just race
on Wednesday and that is what they are in it for.

Eric

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:15 PM, David Otterbein

wrote:

Os,
The scoring program does all the proper scoring automaticly,

it really

can't get any easier.

dave

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Gary Tenenbaum

wrote:>

**

Lee is pretty close on this issue. However, consider that

the fleet may

amend Appendix 'A' in any way it chooses so long as it is

stated in the

sailing instructions. In this case, because the fleet sails

in several

regattas and series that are controlled by various sailing

instructions,>> and each sailing instruction notes that the
fleet will determine its own

scoring, you can choose any method you want without further

notice in the

SIs.

Most of the fleets at NBC (if not all) award an average score

to a

competitor that does not compete because the owner or skipper

of that boat

is working on Race Committee, Race Patrol or an away regatta

or series or

qualifying race. I suggest you to add this to your scoring

system as it

encourages Cruising Fleet members to participate in the above noted
situation.

If you divide your season series into smaller segments, it is

easier and

more equitable to apply various scoring penalties, i.e. a

boat that cannot

compete in the spring may be able to sail the rest of the

season but will

start the summer with a considerable number of points.

Please note the recommendation after Rule A11 and consider

utilizing some

of the ideas.

Gary

----- Original Message -----

From: Lee Luce
To: 'Osman Coskun Kurtulus' ;
wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org ;
wednightracing@nyackboatclub.org
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for

Cruising>> Fleet

To All -****

I am very concerned that the proposed scoring system for 2013

outlined in

Osman's e-mail below does not follow the *U.S. Racing Rules

of Sailing* "

for a series longer than a regatta". ****

Please see Rule A9 of the 2013-2016 rules: "*A boat that did

not come to

the starting area shall be scored points for the finishing

place one more

than the number of boats entered in the series."* ****

A boat that is registered for a Regatta, but does not race is

termed DNS

(Did Not Start). A DNS is scored one more than the number of

starters (same

as the number of boats registered for that regatta).****

A group of races held longer than a regatta is termed a

series.****>>

A boat that is registered for *more than a regatta *(such as the

Wednesday Night series, the Sunday series, etc.), but does

not race is

termed DNC (Did Not Compete). A DNC is scored one more than

the number

registered.****

The number of boats "entered in the series" are defined as

the number of

registered boats for that series. ****

Likewise, a Did Not Finish (DNF) is scored "*one more than

the number of

boats that came to the starting area**"*. Thus if 4 boats

start the race

and one boat gets a DNF, her score shall be 5. The proposed

scoring system

would award a DNF score equal to last place in that race.****

Please think about why these rules are written the way they

are. We use

the low point scoring system. The fewer points you

accumulate, the better.

The proposed method minimizes the scoring penalty for a boat

that does not

race. The same number of points are awarded for a boat that gets

disqualified (DSQ), does not start (DNS), does not compete

(DNC), and does

not finish (DNF) the race. Are we sure we want that? Are we

sure want to go

against the U.S. Rules of Sailing?****

Lastly, please see the Telltale article from August 2012

detailing how

all of the fleets at Nyack score their races. While there are some
differences (such as which home or away regattas are included

in year-end

scoring), all of the Fleets abide by the scoring rules of

U.S. Sailing. I

strongly believe the Cruising Fleet should do the same.****

I am encouraged that the Club Trophy in 2013 will be awarded

based on all

of the NBC Cruising Fleet racing events, not just Wednesday

Night racing.


Lee Luce****

Cruising Fleet Secretary****



From: Wednightracing [mailto:
wednightracing-bounces@maillist.nyackboatclub.org] *On Behalf

Of *Osman

Coskun Kurtulus
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 8:17 PM
To: wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org;
wednightracing@nyackboatclub.org
Subject: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for

Cruising Fleet*



Hello Racers,****


While we are getting excited about the coming up season, I

wanted to get

your input on couple of notions that we have been

contemplating. ****

I have discussed these with several frequent racers, a soft

committee per

se; and the following changes which we propose to improve our

scoring>> system and awarding our trophies for 2013 racing season.****


TROPHIES:****

CLUB Trophy ****

This trophy is awarded to each fleet by the club and covers
the entire season. We will score this with the combination of

the following

races/regattas,****


Wednesday Night Series****

+****

Sunday Series****

+****

Memorial Day Regatta****

Guy Multon Regatta****

Labor Day Regatta****

NBC Last Chance Regatta****

Hudson River Long Distance Race****


CRUISING FLEET Sunday Series Trophy****

This trophy is for our own fleet's award and we will score

this based on

the following races/regattas,****

Sunday Series only****


CRUISING FLEET Wednesday Night Series Trophy****

This trophy is for our own fleet's award and we will score

this based on

the following races/regattas,****

Wednesday Night Series only****


SCORING:****

Eric Baumes will be the official Scorer for the Cruising

Fleet. (I will

be his back up at his absence)****


We will score the boats Did Not Start (DNS) number of starts

  • 1****

We will score the boats Did Not Finish (DNF) last place (4

boats start in

any race and each DNF will be scored 4)****

We will score the boats Disqualified (DSQ) number of starts + 1****



So what say you?****

Please say YES or NO by replying to this email to me, so

that I can

tally the votes to move forward.****


Best****


Osman Kurtulus****

Cruising Fleet Captain (Racing) ****


(917)-774-7454 tel:%28917%29-774-7454 ****



Wednightracing mailing list
Wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org


Wednightracing mailing list
Wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org


Wednightracing mailing list
Wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org

To All - Attached are the racing statistics from 2012 for our Cruising Fleet. Some highlights: There were 50 races scheduled, but only 28 races were completed (not including HRYRA events). Eighteen races were canceled due to no wind, or bad weather. Four race days had good wind, but no Cruising Fleet boats showed up on the starting line. The A Division spinnaker boats raced only on Wednesdays. If they raced on Sundays it was in the non-spinnaker divisions. All races had a minimum of three boats on the starting line. Fifteen boats raced on Sundays, 27 boats raced on Wednesdays. Four boats who raced on Sundays did not race on Wednesdays. Ten boats were listed in the spinnaker A Division, thus a DNC (Did not Compete) = 11. Fifteen boats were listed in the non-spinnaker C Division (PHRF < 187), thus a DNC = 16. Six boats were listed in the non-spinnaker D Division (PHRF > 187), thus a DNC = 7. Racing Frequency As you can see from the data, the highest frequency of racing was in the D Division (64%); the lowest frequency of racing was in the spinnaker A Division (41%). Only three boats attained 60% or greater frequency of racing. The average frequency of racing was: A Division - 23.9%, C Division 30.0%, D Division 45.8%. Nine boats (out of 31) raced in less than 5 races. Those boats with the smallest racing percentage were all in the spinnaker A Division because they did not race on Sundays. Lee's recommendations (for what it's worth) 1) Honor and use the U.S. Racing Rules of Sailing for scoring. 2) Request all racers register by getting a PHRF before May 1st, and announce the PHRF scoring divisions before the first race on May 5th. (Suggestion: within the non-spinnaker group, three divisions might be considered for smaller divisions to improve competition, not two.) 3) Require all scored racers to be paid members of the Cruising Fleet by the time they start racing. 4) According to the NBC Sailing Instructions, three boats must race to have a fleet start. (Less than three boats on the starting line must start with the Open Fleet.) As in the past, if three boats race but only one completes the course in the allotted time, all boats are scored. Likewise, if only one boat completes the race course, that boat receives a score and is not penalized because no other competitor shows up. In other words, while you need three boats to have a starting gun from the race Committee, only one boat needs to run the course for the race to count. 5) A boat should complete a minimum of 10% of the races scheduled to be considered a registered boat. Remember, the lower the percentage, the more you encourage racers to come out and try. 6) Boats that compete in HRYRA races may receive an average of their annual scores at NBC for the races missed at Nyack, if a Nyack race is held. The Around Long Island Race should not be considered part of the Nyack racing venue, and boats competing in that race should not receive an average of their score. 7) Skippers that volunteer time on the Race Committee and Race Patrol, not as part of their Club duty obligation, may receive an average of their annual score for that race. 8) As proposed, the annual Club trophy should be determined by performance in all Cruising Fleet venues for 2013 including Sunday, Regatta, and Wednesday Night racing. Plus see #6 above for HRYRA racing to be included. 9) In addition, Fleet trophies should be awarded for Sunday, Wednesday Night, Spring Series and Fall Series competitions. I notice that most of these e-mails below strongly represent members who race (or crew) in the spinnaker A Division, roughly one-third of those who race in the Cruising fleet. Could it be that these members pull their crew from one-design racers in the Club, and so have a vested interest in not racing on weekends? If this observation offends, I apologize. But one would be remiss not to mention it. Lee Luce Cruising Fleet Secretary From: Carmen and Ruth Yannelli [mailto:ruthcarm@optonline.net] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 10:19 PM To: 'Eric Baumes'; luce01@optonline.net; 'Gary Tenenbaum'; 'Osman Kurtulus'; 'Cruising Fleet Racers' Subject: RE: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for Cruising Fleet A couple of thoughts, I like the idea of a boat having to compete in a minimum number of races to be scored for the overall trophy. I also like the idea of a minimum number of boats on the line for a race to count towards the season standings. I would suggest a 60/40 rule, you have to race in 60% of the races in order to be counted in the scoring and a race will only count if 40% of the fleet (those that raced in 60% of the races) showed up. This could lead to a lot of suspense at the end of the season trying to figure out who won the award, but we have a few months to figure it out... This solves a couple of problems without setting things in stone. The debate over which races to include goes away, if boats show up on a given day the race counts, if they don't show up it does not count. It's very simple and reflects the will of the fleet to show up and race. I think in the long run this would build participation in Sundays, maybe not everyone at once, but a few boats at a time. The other problem solved is the penalty for missing a race. Assume that 10 boats race over the course of the season in a given fleet, but 4 of them only race in a handful of races. The penalty for missing a race would be 6 + 1 not 10 +1, because boats 7, 8, 9 and 10 would not be counted towards the overall scoring. As far as the PHRF certificates and fleet membership are concerned, out of courtesy to the sucker who has to handle all of the scoring, get your PHRF certificates and pay your fleet dues before the season begins. It only creates more work for the guy that's volunteering his time to do the scoring. Lastly, as far as HRYRA and other races (ALIR/Vineyard/etc) are concerned, I feel that we should be supporting the folks who are trying to step up their game and are representing our club in these events. Consider giving an average score for a boat that ventures out to these venues. Other fleets in the club do the same thing for boats that are traveling. You could also count these boats towards the minimum on any given day and may find out that more races count because we are including more boats in the scoring. Carmen From: Wednightracing [mailto:wednightracing-bounces@maillist.nyackboatclub.org] On Behalf Of Eric Baumes Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 6:40 PM To: luce01@optonline.net; Gary Tenenbaum; Osman Kurtulus; Cruising Fleet Racers Subject: Re: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for Cruising Fleet As Gary pointed out we can modify Appendix A at will we do it all the time. I think anyone last year could have asked for redress in scoring as boats that did not "register" regularly sailed and were scored. As for Wed vs. Sun vs. Holiday regattas I think tradition has to look at reality. 3-4x more boats race wednesday than Sunday and the turnout for Holiday regattas for cruising boats is not any better. Tradition is great, but the shift towards weekday vespers series for big boat racing is a national phenomenon. Economics, shifting demographics and family commitments are changing the nature of the sport and how people play it. We can either change with the times or continue fight it. I have raced on and off on sundays at the club since 2004, and there have never been more than a handful of boats on the line. When I was racing with Jack Yates, often time is was just us and Lipscomb. I think we should have a cruising start on Sunday, but I don't know if it is what people think of when they think of cruising fleet (PHRF) racing at the club. Perhaps we should listen to the numbers and the participants. Finally I take umbrage at the insinuation that I would score counter to the RRS as modified by the NoR or SIs. I am however as far as I know still entitled to an opinion. Sincerely, E. A. Baumes On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:29 PM, <luce01@optonline.net> wrote: Eric - I would like to point out that if you, as appointed head scorer, insist on "I am for counting DNC and DNS the same per Osman's recommendation" then any racer may legitimately protest and request the race results be thrown out because the scoring does not conform to the Racing Rules of Sailing. The SIs are clear that we sail under the RRS, but the fleets are responsible for their own scoring. That doesn't mean anyone has authority to change the rules at will. You are, of course, correct that the PHRF divisions last year were horribly out of whack leading to great scoring inequities, especially in the C division. I strongly suggest that attention be paid to a more equal set of PHRF divisions (for example, no more than 8 boats per division), and that the fleet decide the minimum number of races a boat must complete to be counted in series scoring. These rules should be in effect before the start of the racing season. I am quite pained that anyone would think that regatta or Sunday racing should not be taken seriously. This is the heart, and historic core-being, of our Club. You must remember than some members work during the week and can't make a 6:30 pm start time on Wednesday nights. But most people can race on Sundays if they choose. Lee ----- Original Message ----- From: Eric Baumes Date: Monday, March 25, 2013 1:47 pm Subject: Re: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for Cruising Fleet To: David Otterbein Cc: wednightracing@nyackboatclub.org, wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org > My 2 cents. > > One of the problems we have with scoring the long series is the > fact that > many boats show up for a race or two, then don't come back. Or boats > register for the 'series' then don't race. > > What then happens is the DNC - number of registrants plus one > can become an > onerous penalty. If you exceed throw outs and miss an extra race the > penalty can be something crazy like14, when normally half that > number of > boats race. > > As we don't have or enforce a rigorous registration process I am for > counting DNC and DNS the same per Osman's recommendation. > > As it stands now, I don't think anyone who is actually serious > about racing > takes any of the Over all cruising fleet trophies seriously. > Most just race > on Wednesday and that is what they are in it for. > > Eric > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:15 PM, David Otterbein > wrote: > > Os, > > The scoring program does all the proper scoring automaticly, > it really > > can't get any easier. > > > > dave > > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Gary Tenenbaum > wrote:> > >> ** > >> Lee is pretty close on this issue. However, consider that > the fleet may > >> amend Appendix 'A' in any way it chooses so long as it is > stated in the > >> sailing instructions. In this case, because the fleet sails > in several > >> regattas and series that are controlled by various sailing > instructions,>> and each sailing instruction notes that the > fleet will determine its own > >> scoring, you can choose any method you want without further > notice in the > >> SIs. > >> > >> Most of the fleets at NBC (if not all) award an average score > to a > >> competitor that does not compete because the owner or skipper > of that boat > >> is working on Race Committee, Race Patrol or an away regatta > or series or > >> qualifying race. I suggest you to add this to your scoring > system as it > >> encourages Cruising Fleet members to participate in the above noted > >> situation. > >> > >> If you divide your season series into smaller segments, it is > easier and > >> more equitable to apply various scoring penalties, i.e. a > boat that cannot > >> compete in the spring may be able to sail the rest of the > season but will > >> start the summer with a considerable number of points. > >> > >> Please note the recommendation after Rule A11 and consider > utilizing some > >> of the ideas. > >> > >> Gary > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> *From:* Lee Luce > >> *To:* 'Osman Coskun Kurtulus' ; > >> wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org ; > >> wednightracing@nyackboatclub.org > >> *Sent:* Sunday, March 24, 2013 11:47 PM > >> *Subject:* Re: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for > Cruising>> Fleet > >> > >> To All -**** > >> > >> I am very concerned that the proposed scoring system for 2013 > outlined in > >> Osman's e-mail below does not follow the *U.S. Racing Rules > of Sailing* " > >> *for a series longer than a regatta*". **** > >> > >> Please see Rule A9 of the 2013-2016 rules: "*A boat that did > not come to > >> the starting area shall be scored points for the finishing > place one more > >> than the number of boats entered in the series."* **** > >> > >> A boat that is registered for a Regatta, but does not race is > termed DNS > >> (Did Not Start). A DNS is scored one more than the number of > starters (same > >> as the number of boats registered for that regatta).**** > >> > >> A group of races held longer than a regatta is termed a > *series*.****>> > >> A boat that is registered for *more than a regatta *(such as the > >> Wednesday Night series, the Sunday series, etc.), but does > not race is > >> termed DNC (Did Not Compete). A DNC is scored one more than > the number > >> registered.**** > >> > >> The number of boats "entered in the series" are defined as > the number of > >> registered boats for that series. **** > >> > >> Likewise, a Did Not Finish (DNF) is scored "*one more than > the number of > >> boats that came to the starting area**"*. Thus if 4 boats > start the race > >> and one boat gets a DNF, her score shall be 5. The proposed > scoring system > >> would award a DNF score equal to last place in that race.**** > >> > >> Please think about why these rules are written the way they > are. We use > >> the low point scoring system. The fewer points you > accumulate, the better. > >> The proposed method minimizes the scoring penalty for a boat > that does not > >> race. The *same number of points* are awarded for a boat that gets > >> disqualified (DSQ), does not start (DNS), does not compete > (DNC), and does > >> not finish (DNF) the race. Are we sure we want that? Are we > sure want to go > >> against the *U.S. Rules of Sailing*?**** > >> > >> Lastly, please see the *Telltale* article from August 2012 > detailing how > >> all of the fleets at Nyack score their races. While there are some > >> differences (such as which home or away regattas are included > in year-end > >> scoring), all of the Fleets abide by the scoring rules of > U.S. Sailing. I > >> strongly believe the Cruising Fleet should do the same.**** > >> > >> I am encouraged that the Club Trophy in 2013 will be awarded > based on all > >> of the NBC Cruising Fleet racing events, not just Wednesday > Night racing. > >> **** > >> > >> Lee Luce**** > >> > >> Cruising Fleet Secretary**** > >> > >> ** ** > >> > >> ** ** > >> > >> *From:* Wednightracing [mailto: > >> wednightracing-bounces@maillist.nyackboatclub.org] *On Behalf > Of *Osman > >> Coskun Kurtulus > >> *Sent:* Sunday, March 24, 2013 8:17 PM > >> *To:* wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org; > >> wednightracing@nyackboatclub.org > >> *Subject:* [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for > Cruising Fleet* > >> *** > >> > >> ** ** > >> > >> Hello Racers,**** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> While we are getting excited about the coming up season, I > wanted to get > >> your input on couple of notions that we have been > contemplating. **** > >> > >> I have discussed these with several frequent racers, a soft > committee per > >> se; and the following changes which we propose to improve our > scoring>> system and awarding our trophies for 2013 racing season.**** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> *TROPHIES:***** > >> > >> *CLUB Trophy* **** > >> > >> This trophy is awarded to each fleet by the club and covers > >> the entire season. We will score this with the combination of > the following > >> races/regattas,**** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> *Wednesday Night Series***** > >> > >> *+***** > >> > >> *Sunday Series***** > >> > >> *+***** > >> > >> *Memorial Day Regatta***** > >> > >> *Guy Multon Regatta***** > >> > >> *Labor Day Regatta***** > >> > >> *NBC Last Chance Regatta***** > >> > >> *Hudson River Long Distance Race***** > >> > >> ** ** > >> > >> *CRUISING FLEET Sunday Series Trophy***** > >> > >> This trophy is for our own fleet's award and we will score > this based on > >> the following races/regattas,**** > >> > >> *Sunday Series only***** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> *CRUISING FLEET Wednesday Night Series Trophy***** > >> > >> This trophy is for our own fleet's award and we will score > this based on > >> the following races/regattas,**** > >> > >> *Wednesday Night Series only***** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> *SCORING:***** > >> > >> Eric Baumes will be the official Scorer for the Cruising > Fleet. (I will > >> be his back up at his absence)**** > >> > >> ** ** > >> > >> We will score the boats Did Not Start (DNS) number of starts > + 1**** > >> > >> We will score the boats Did Not Finish (DNF) last place (4 > boats start in > >> any race and each DNF will be scored 4)**** > >> > >> We will score the boats Disqualified (DSQ) number of starts + 1**** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> So what say you?**** > >> > >> Please say *YES* or *NO* by replying to this email to me, so > that I can > >> tally the votes to move forward.**** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> Best**** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> Osman Kurtulus**** > >> > >> Cruising Fleet Captain (Racing) **** > >> > >> ** ** > >> > >> (917)-774-7454 <tel:%28917%29-774-7454> **** > >> > >> ------------------------------ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wednightracing mailing list > >> Wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org > >> > >> > http://maillist.nyackboatclub.org/mailman/listinfo/wednightracing_maillist.n yackboatclub.org>> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wednightracing mailing list > >> Wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org > >> > >> > http://maillist.nyackboatclub.org/mailman/listinfo/wednightracing_maillist.n yackboatclub.org>> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wednightracing mailing list > > Wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org > > > > > http://maillist.nyackboatclub.org/mailman/listinfo/wednightracing_maillist.n yackboatclub.org> > > >
CA
Carmen and Ruth Yannelli
Wed, Mar 27, 2013 4:31 AM

All,

It's funny how one can use statistics to paint any picture they want.
Without the benefit of having the numbers in front of me,  I have to ask a
question. If one were to break down the numbers by Wednesday night and
Sunday afternoons instead of by the total number of races,  how do the
percentages compare?  Based on the few details Lee shared,  I would bet it
shows that people don't give a rat's you know what about Sundays,  but they
really enjoy their Wednesday nights.

That said,  I'll share with everyone else the idea I sent to Lee earlier
because I believe it is a fair compromise.

Count the Sunday races and regattas only when there is no Wednesday night
racing.  This approach counts the events with the higher participation
percentages,  gives us roughly the same number of days as the one designs
and gives everyone the opportunity to take cruises with our cruising boats
over summer weekends.  We can still have starts on Sundays when there is
Wednesday night racing,  we would just not include them in the overall
scoring.

No other fleet has racing two days a week on a regular basis.  It's flat out
crazy to expect anyone with a job and/or family to commit to racing two days
a week thru the summer.  Forget about trying to get a crew of 7 or 8 to
commit to 50 dates over roughly 25 weeks.  Setting the bar so high that only
a few can realistically achieve it does nothing to entice the rest of us to
participate.  In fact, it has the opposite effect.

Our goal here should be to come up with a system that is fair to everyone
who wants to participate, not just the few who can race in 50 events or the
few who only want to race on Wednesdays.

Carmen

From: Lee Luce [mailto:luce01@optonline.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 10:49 PM
To: 'Carmen and Ruth Yannelli'; 'Eric Baumes'; 'Gary Tenenbaum'; 'Osman
Kurtulus'; 'Cruising Fleet Racers'
Subject: Cruising Fleet Statistics

To All -

Attached are the racing statistics from 2012 for our Cruising Fleet.

Some highlights:

There were 50 races scheduled, but only 28 races were completed (not
including HRYRA events).

Eighteen races were canceled due to no wind, or bad weather.

Four race days had good wind, but no Cruising Fleet boats showed up on the
starting line.

The A Division spinnaker boats raced only on Wednesdays. If they raced on
Sundays it was in the non-spinnaker divisions.

All races had a minimum of three boats on the starting line.

Fifteen boats raced on Sundays, 27 boats raced on Wednesdays. Four boats who
raced on Sundays did not race on Wednesdays.

Ten boats were listed in the spinnaker A Division, thus a DNC (Did not
Compete) = 11.

Fifteen boats were listed in the non-spinnaker C Division (PHRF < 187), thus
a DNC = 16.

Six boats were listed in the non-spinnaker D Division (PHRF > 187), thus a
DNC = 7.

Racing Frequency

As you can see from the data, the highest frequency of racing was in the D
Division (64%); the lowest frequency of racing was in the spinnaker A
Division (41%).

Only three boats attained 60% or greater frequency of racing.

The average frequency of racing was: A Division -  23.9%, C Division 30.0%,
D Division 45.8%.

Nine boats (out of 31) raced in less than 5 races. Those boats with the
smallest racing percentage were all in the spinnaker A Division because they
did not race on Sundays.

Lee's recommendations (for what it's worth)

  1.  Honor and use the U.S. Racing Rules of Sailing for scoring. 
    
  2.  Request all racers register by getting a PHRF before May 1st, and
    

announce the PHRF scoring divisions before the first race on May 5th.
(Suggestion: within the non-spinnaker group, three divisions might be
considered for smaller divisions to improve competition, not two.)

  1.  Require all scored racers to be paid members of the Cruising Fleet
    

by the time they start racing.

  1.  According to the NBC Sailing Instructions, three boats must race to
    

have a fleet start. (Less than three boats on the starting line must start
with the Open Fleet.) As in the past, if three boats race but only one
completes the course in the allotted time, all boats are scored. Likewise,
if only one boat completes the race course, that boat receives a score and
is not penalized because no other competitor shows up. In other words, while
you need three boats to have a starting gun from the race Committee, only
one boat needs to run the course for the race to count.

  1.  A boat should complete a minimum of 10% of the races scheduled to be
    

considered a registered boat. Remember, the lower the percentage, the more
you encourage racers to come out and try.

  1.  Boats that compete in HRYRA races may receive an average of their
    

annual scores at NBC for the races missed at Nyack, if a Nyack race is held.
The Around Long Island Race should not be considered part of the Nyack
racing venue, and boats competing in that race should not receive an average
of their score.

  1.  Skippers that volunteer time on the Race Committee and Race Patrol,
    

not as part of their Club duty obligation, may receive an average of their
annual score for that race.

  1.  As proposed, the annual Club trophy should be determined by
    

performance in all Cruising Fleet venues for 2013 including Sunday, Regatta,
and Wednesday Night racing. Plus see #6 above for HRYRA racing to be
included.

  1.  In addition, Fleet trophies should be awarded for Sunday, Wednesday
    

Night, Spring Series and Fall Series competitions.

I notice that most of these e-mails below strongly represent members who
race (or crew) in the spinnaker A Division, roughly one-third of those who
race in the Cruising fleet. Could it be that these members pull their crew
from one-design racers in the Club, and so have a vested interest in not
racing on weekends? If this observation offends, I apologize. But one would
be remiss not to mention it.

Lee Luce

Cruising Fleet Secretary

From: Carmen and Ruth Yannelli [mailto:ruthcarm@optonline.net]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 10:19 PM
To: 'Eric Baumes'; luce01@optonline.net; 'Gary Tenenbaum'; 'Osman Kurtulus';
'Cruising Fleet Racers'
Subject: RE: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for Cruising Fleet

A couple of thoughts, I like the idea of a boat having to compete in a
minimum number of races to be scored for the overall trophy.  I also like
the idea of a minimum number of boats on the line for a race to count
towards the season standings.  I would suggest a 60/40  rule,  you have to
race in 60% of the races in order to be counted in the scoring and a race
will only count if 40% of the fleet (those that raced in 60% of the races)
showed up.  This could lead to a lot of suspense at the end of the season
trying to figure out who won the award,  but we have a few months to figure
it out...  This solves a couple of problems without setting things in stone.
The debate over which races to include goes away,  if boats show up on a
given day the race counts,  if they don't show up it does not count. It's
very simple and reflects the will of the fleet to show up and race.  I think
in the long run this would build participation in Sundays, maybe not
everyone at once,  but a few boats at a time. The other problem solved is
the penalty for missing a race. Assume that 10 boats race over the course of
the season in a given fleet,  but 4 of them only race in a handful of races.
The penalty for missing a race would be 6 + 1 not 10 +1, because boats 7, 8,
9 and 10 would not be counted towards the overall scoring.

As far as the PHRF certificates and fleet membership are concerned,  out of
courtesy to the sucker who has to handle all of the scoring,  get your PHRF
certificates and pay your fleet dues before the season begins.  It only
creates more work for the guy that's volunteering his time to do the
scoring.

Lastly,  as far as HRYRA and other races (ALIR/Vineyard/etc) are concerned,
I feel that we should be supporting the folks who are trying to step up
their game and are representing our club in these events.  Consider giving
an average score for a boat that ventures out to these venues.  Other fleets
in the club do the same thing for boats that are traveling.  You could also
count these boats towards the minimum on any given day and may find out that
more races count because we are including more boats in the scoring.

Carmen

From: Wednightracing
[mailto:wednightracing-bounces@maillist.nyackboatclub.org] On Behalf Of Eric
Baumes
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 6:40 PM
To: luce01@optonline.net; Gary Tenenbaum; Osman Kurtulus; Cruising Fleet
Racers
Subject: Re: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for Cruising Fleet

As Gary pointed out we can modify Appendix A at will we do it all the time.
I think anyone last year could have asked for redress in scoring as boats
that did not "register" regularly sailed and were scored.

As for Wed vs. Sun vs. Holiday regattas I think tradition has to look at
reality. 3-4x more boats race wednesday than Sunday and the turnout for
Holiday regattas for cruising boats is not any better. Tradition is great,
but the shift towards weekday vespers series for big boat racing is a
national phenomenon. Economics, shifting demographics and family commitments
are changing the nature of the sport and how people play it. We can either
change with the times or continue fight it.

I have raced on and off on sundays at the club since 2004, and there have
never been more than a handful of boats on the line. When I was racing with
Jack Yates, often time is was just us and Lipscomb. I think we should have a
cruising start on Sunday, but I don't know if it is what people think of
when they think of cruising fleet (PHRF) racing at the club. Perhaps we
should listen to the numbers and the participants.

Finally I take umbrage at the insinuation that I would score counter to the
RRS as modified by the NoR or SIs. I am however as far as I know still
entitled to an opinion.

Sincerely,

E. A. Baumes

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:29 PM, luce01@optonline.net wrote:

Eric -

I would like to point out that if you, as appointed head scorer, insist on
"I am for counting DNC and DNS the same per Osman's recommendation" then
any racer may legitimately protest and request the race results be thrown
out because the scoring does not conform to the Racing Rules of Sailing. The
SIs are clear that we sail under the RRS, but the fleets are responsible for
their own scoring. That doesn't mean anyone has authority to change the
rules at will.

You are, of course, correct that the PHRF divisions last year were horribly
out of whack leading to great scoring inequities, especially in the C
division. I strongly suggest that attention be paid to a more equal set of
PHRF divisions (for example, no more than 8 boats per division), and that
the fleet decide the minimum number of races a boat must complete to be
counted in series scoring. These rules should be in effect before the start
of the racing season.

I am quite pained that anyone would think that regatta or Sunday racing
should not be taken seriously. This is the heart, and historic core-being,
of our Club. You must remember than some members work during the week and
can't make a 6:30 pm start time on Wednesday nights. But most people can
race on Sundays if they choose.

Lee

----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Baumes
Date: Monday, March 25, 2013 1:47 pm
Subject: Re: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for Cruising Fleet

To: David Otterbein
Cc: wednightracing@nyackboatclub.org,
wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org

My 2 cents.

One of the problems we have with scoring the long series is the
fact that
many boats show up for a race or two, then don't come back. Or boats
register for the 'series' then don't race.

What then happens is the DNC - number of registrants plus one
can become an
onerous penalty. If you exceed throw outs and miss an extra race the
penalty can be something crazy like14, when normally half that
number of
boats race.

As we don't have or enforce a rigorous registration process I am for
counting DNC and DNS the same per Osman's recommendation.

As it stands now, I don't think anyone who is actually serious
about racing
takes any of the Over all cruising fleet trophies seriously.
Most just race
on Wednesday and that is what they are in it for.

Eric

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:15 PM, David Otterbein

wrote:

Os,
The scoring program does all the proper scoring automaticly,

it really

can't get any easier.

dave

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Gary Tenenbaum

wrote:>

**

Lee is pretty close on this issue. However, consider that

the fleet may

amend Appendix 'A' in any way it chooses so long as it is

stated in the

sailing instructions. In this case, because the fleet sails

in several

regattas and series that are controlled by various sailing

instructions,>> and each sailing instruction notes that the
fleet will determine its own

scoring, you can choose any method you want without further

notice in the

SIs.

Most of the fleets at NBC (if not all) award an average score

to a

competitor that does not compete because the owner or skipper

of that boat

is working on Race Committee, Race Patrol or an away regatta

or series or

qualifying race. I suggest you to add this to your scoring

system as it

encourages Cruising Fleet members to participate in the above noted
situation.

If you divide your season series into smaller segments, it is

easier and

more equitable to apply various scoring penalties, i.e. a

boat that cannot

compete in the spring may be able to sail the rest of the

season but will

start the summer with a considerable number of points.

Please note the recommendation after Rule A11 and consider

utilizing some

of the ideas.

Gary

----- Original Message -----

From: Lee Luce
To: 'Osman Coskun Kurtulus' ;
wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org ;
wednightracing@nyackboatclub.org
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for

Cruising>> Fleet

To All -****

I am very concerned that the proposed scoring system for 2013

outlined in

Osman's e-mail below does not follow the *U.S. Racing Rules

of Sailing* "

for a series longer than a regatta". ****

Please see Rule A9 of the 2013-2016 rules: "*A boat that did

not come to

the starting area shall be scored points for the finishing

place one more

than the number of boats entered in the series."* ****

A boat that is registered for a Regatta, but does not race is

termed DNS

(Did Not Start). A DNS is scored one more than the number of

starters (same

as the number of boats registered for that regatta).****

A group of races held longer than a regatta is termed a

series.****>>

A boat that is registered for *more than a regatta *(such as the

Wednesday Night series, the Sunday series, etc.), but does

not race is

termed DNC (Did Not Compete). A DNC is scored one more than

the number

registered.****

The number of boats "entered in the series" are defined as

the number of

registered boats for that series. ****

Likewise, a Did Not Finish (DNF) is scored "*one more than

the number of

boats that came to the starting area**"*. Thus if 4 boats

start the race

and one boat gets a DNF, her score shall be 5. The proposed

scoring system

would award a DNF score equal to last place in that race.****

Please think about why these rules are written the way they

are. We use

the low point scoring system. The fewer points you

accumulate, the better.

The proposed method minimizes the scoring penalty for a boat

that does not

race. The same number of points are awarded for a boat that gets

disqualified (DSQ), does not start (DNS), does not compete

(DNC), and does

not finish (DNF) the race. Are we sure we want that? Are we

sure want to go

against the U.S. Rules of Sailing?****

Lastly, please see the Telltale article from August 2012

detailing how

all of the fleets at Nyack score their races. While there are some
differences (such as which home or away regattas are included

in year-end

scoring), all of the Fleets abide by the scoring rules of

U.S. Sailing. I

strongly believe the Cruising Fleet should do the same.****

I am encouraged that the Club Trophy in 2013 will be awarded

based on all

of the NBC Cruising Fleet racing events, not just Wednesday

Night racing.


Lee Luce****

Cruising Fleet Secretary****



From: Wednightracing [mailto:
wednightracing-bounces@maillist.nyackboatclub.org] *On Behalf

Of *Osman

Coskun Kurtulus
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 8:17 PM
To: wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org;
wednightracing@nyackboatclub.org
Subject: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for

Cruising Fleet*



Hello Racers,****


While we are getting excited about the coming up season, I

wanted to get

your input on couple of notions that we have been

contemplating. ****

I have discussed these with several frequent racers, a soft

committee per

se; and the following changes which we propose to improve our

scoring>> system and awarding our trophies for 2013 racing season.****


TROPHIES:****

CLUB Trophy ****

This trophy is awarded to each fleet by the club and covers
the entire season. We will score this with the combination of

the following

races/regattas,****


Wednesday Night Series****

+****

Sunday Series****

+****

Memorial Day Regatta****

Guy Multon Regatta****

Labor Day Regatta****

NBC Last Chance Regatta****

Hudson River Long Distance Race****


CRUISING FLEET Sunday Series Trophy****

This trophy is for our own fleet's award and we will score

this based on

the following races/regattas,****

Sunday Series only****


CRUISING FLEET Wednesday Night Series Trophy****

This trophy is for our own fleet's award and we will score

this based on

the following races/regattas,****

Wednesday Night Series only****


SCORING:****

Eric Baumes will be the official Scorer for the Cruising

Fleet. (I will

be his back up at his absence)****


We will score the boats Did Not Start (DNS) number of starts

  • 1****

We will score the boats Did Not Finish (DNF) last place (4

boats start in

any race and each DNF will be scored 4)****

We will score the boats Disqualified (DSQ) number of starts + 1****



So what say you?****

Please say YES or NO by replying to this email to me, so

that I can

tally the votes to move forward.****


Best****


Osman Kurtulus****

Cruising Fleet Captain (Racing) ****


(917)-774-7454 tel:%28917%29-774-7454 ****



Wednightracing mailing list
Wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org


Wednightracing mailing list
Wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org


Wednightracing mailing list
Wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org

All, It's funny how one can use statistics to paint any picture they want. Without the benefit of having the numbers in front of me, I have to ask a question. If one were to break down the numbers by Wednesday night and Sunday afternoons instead of by the total number of races, how do the percentages compare? Based on the few details Lee shared, I would bet it shows that people don't give a rat's you know what about Sundays, but they really enjoy their Wednesday nights. That said, I'll share with everyone else the idea I sent to Lee earlier because I believe it is a fair compromise. Count the Sunday races and regattas only when there is no Wednesday night racing. This approach counts the events with the higher participation percentages, gives us roughly the same number of days as the one designs and gives everyone the opportunity to take cruises with our cruising boats over summer weekends. We can still have starts on Sundays when there is Wednesday night racing, we would just not include them in the overall scoring. No other fleet has racing two days a week on a regular basis. It's flat out crazy to expect anyone with a job and/or family to commit to racing two days a week thru the summer. Forget about trying to get a crew of 7 or 8 to commit to 50 dates over roughly 25 weeks. Setting the bar so high that only a few can realistically achieve it does nothing to entice the rest of us to participate. In fact, it has the opposite effect. Our goal here should be to come up with a system that is fair to everyone who wants to participate, not just the few who can race in 50 events or the few who only want to race on Wednesdays. Carmen From: Lee Luce [mailto:luce01@optonline.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 10:49 PM To: 'Carmen and Ruth Yannelli'; 'Eric Baumes'; 'Gary Tenenbaum'; 'Osman Kurtulus'; 'Cruising Fleet Racers' Subject: Cruising Fleet Statistics To All - Attached are the racing statistics from 2012 for our Cruising Fleet. Some highlights: There were 50 races scheduled, but only 28 races were completed (not including HRYRA events). Eighteen races were canceled due to no wind, or bad weather. Four race days had good wind, but no Cruising Fleet boats showed up on the starting line. The A Division spinnaker boats raced only on Wednesdays. If they raced on Sundays it was in the non-spinnaker divisions. All races had a minimum of three boats on the starting line. Fifteen boats raced on Sundays, 27 boats raced on Wednesdays. Four boats who raced on Sundays did not race on Wednesdays. Ten boats were listed in the spinnaker A Division, thus a DNC (Did not Compete) = 11. Fifteen boats were listed in the non-spinnaker C Division (PHRF < 187), thus a DNC = 16. Six boats were listed in the non-spinnaker D Division (PHRF > 187), thus a DNC = 7. Racing Frequency As you can see from the data, the highest frequency of racing was in the D Division (64%); the lowest frequency of racing was in the spinnaker A Division (41%). Only three boats attained 60% or greater frequency of racing. The average frequency of racing was: A Division - 23.9%, C Division 30.0%, D Division 45.8%. Nine boats (out of 31) raced in less than 5 races. Those boats with the smallest racing percentage were all in the spinnaker A Division because they did not race on Sundays. Lee's recommendations (for what it's worth) 1) Honor and use the U.S. Racing Rules of Sailing for scoring. 2) Request all racers register by getting a PHRF before May 1st, and announce the PHRF scoring divisions before the first race on May 5th. (Suggestion: within the non-spinnaker group, three divisions might be considered for smaller divisions to improve competition, not two.) 3) Require all scored racers to be paid members of the Cruising Fleet by the time they start racing. 4) According to the NBC Sailing Instructions, three boats must race to have a fleet start. (Less than three boats on the starting line must start with the Open Fleet.) As in the past, if three boats race but only one completes the course in the allotted time, all boats are scored. Likewise, if only one boat completes the race course, that boat receives a score and is not penalized because no other competitor shows up. In other words, while you need three boats to have a starting gun from the race Committee, only one boat needs to run the course for the race to count. 5) A boat should complete a minimum of 10% of the races scheduled to be considered a registered boat. Remember, the lower the percentage, the more you encourage racers to come out and try. 6) Boats that compete in HRYRA races may receive an average of their annual scores at NBC for the races missed at Nyack, if a Nyack race is held. The Around Long Island Race should not be considered part of the Nyack racing venue, and boats competing in that race should not receive an average of their score. 7) Skippers that volunteer time on the Race Committee and Race Patrol, not as part of their Club duty obligation, may receive an average of their annual score for that race. 8) As proposed, the annual Club trophy should be determined by performance in all Cruising Fleet venues for 2013 including Sunday, Regatta, and Wednesday Night racing. Plus see #6 above for HRYRA racing to be included. 9) In addition, Fleet trophies should be awarded for Sunday, Wednesday Night, Spring Series and Fall Series competitions. I notice that most of these e-mails below strongly represent members who race (or crew) in the spinnaker A Division, roughly one-third of those who race in the Cruising fleet. Could it be that these members pull their crew from one-design racers in the Club, and so have a vested interest in not racing on weekends? If this observation offends, I apologize. But one would be remiss not to mention it. Lee Luce Cruising Fleet Secretary From: Carmen and Ruth Yannelli [mailto:ruthcarm@optonline.net] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 10:19 PM To: 'Eric Baumes'; luce01@optonline.net; 'Gary Tenenbaum'; 'Osman Kurtulus'; 'Cruising Fleet Racers' Subject: RE: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for Cruising Fleet A couple of thoughts, I like the idea of a boat having to compete in a minimum number of races to be scored for the overall trophy. I also like the idea of a minimum number of boats on the line for a race to count towards the season standings. I would suggest a 60/40 rule, you have to race in 60% of the races in order to be counted in the scoring and a race will only count if 40% of the fleet (those that raced in 60% of the races) showed up. This could lead to a lot of suspense at the end of the season trying to figure out who won the award, but we have a few months to figure it out... This solves a couple of problems without setting things in stone. The debate over which races to include goes away, if boats show up on a given day the race counts, if they don't show up it does not count. It's very simple and reflects the will of the fleet to show up and race. I think in the long run this would build participation in Sundays, maybe not everyone at once, but a few boats at a time. The other problem solved is the penalty for missing a race. Assume that 10 boats race over the course of the season in a given fleet, but 4 of them only race in a handful of races. The penalty for missing a race would be 6 + 1 not 10 +1, because boats 7, 8, 9 and 10 would not be counted towards the overall scoring. As far as the PHRF certificates and fleet membership are concerned, out of courtesy to the sucker who has to handle all of the scoring, get your PHRF certificates and pay your fleet dues before the season begins. It only creates more work for the guy that's volunteering his time to do the scoring. Lastly, as far as HRYRA and other races (ALIR/Vineyard/etc) are concerned, I feel that we should be supporting the folks who are trying to step up their game and are representing our club in these events. Consider giving an average score for a boat that ventures out to these venues. Other fleets in the club do the same thing for boats that are traveling. You could also count these boats towards the minimum on any given day and may find out that more races count because we are including more boats in the scoring. Carmen From: Wednightracing [mailto:wednightracing-bounces@maillist.nyackboatclub.org] On Behalf Of Eric Baumes Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 6:40 PM To: luce01@optonline.net; Gary Tenenbaum; Osman Kurtulus; Cruising Fleet Racers Subject: Re: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for Cruising Fleet As Gary pointed out we can modify Appendix A at will we do it all the time. I think anyone last year could have asked for redress in scoring as boats that did not "register" regularly sailed and were scored. As for Wed vs. Sun vs. Holiday regattas I think tradition has to look at reality. 3-4x more boats race wednesday than Sunday and the turnout for Holiday regattas for cruising boats is not any better. Tradition is great, but the shift towards weekday vespers series for big boat racing is a national phenomenon. Economics, shifting demographics and family commitments are changing the nature of the sport and how people play it. We can either change with the times or continue fight it. I have raced on and off on sundays at the club since 2004, and there have never been more than a handful of boats on the line. When I was racing with Jack Yates, often time is was just us and Lipscomb. I think we should have a cruising start on Sunday, but I don't know if it is what people think of when they think of cruising fleet (PHRF) racing at the club. Perhaps we should listen to the numbers and the participants. Finally I take umbrage at the insinuation that I would score counter to the RRS as modified by the NoR or SIs. I am however as far as I know still entitled to an opinion. Sincerely, E. A. Baumes On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:29 PM, <luce01@optonline.net> wrote: Eric - I would like to point out that if you, as appointed head scorer, insist on "I am for counting DNC and DNS the same per Osman's recommendation" then any racer may legitimately protest and request the race results be thrown out because the scoring does not conform to the Racing Rules of Sailing. The SIs are clear that we sail under the RRS, but the fleets are responsible for their own scoring. That doesn't mean anyone has authority to change the rules at will. You are, of course, correct that the PHRF divisions last year were horribly out of whack leading to great scoring inequities, especially in the C division. I strongly suggest that attention be paid to a more equal set of PHRF divisions (for example, no more than 8 boats per division), and that the fleet decide the minimum number of races a boat must complete to be counted in series scoring. These rules should be in effect before the start of the racing season. I am quite pained that anyone would think that regatta or Sunday racing should not be taken seriously. This is the heart, and historic core-being, of our Club. You must remember than some members work during the week and can't make a 6:30 pm start time on Wednesday nights. But most people can race on Sundays if they choose. Lee ----- Original Message ----- From: Eric Baumes Date: Monday, March 25, 2013 1:47 pm Subject: Re: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for Cruising Fleet To: David Otterbein Cc: wednightracing@nyackboatclub.org, wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org > My 2 cents. > > One of the problems we have with scoring the long series is the > fact that > many boats show up for a race or two, then don't come back. Or boats > register for the 'series' then don't race. > > What then happens is the DNC - number of registrants plus one > can become an > onerous penalty. If you exceed throw outs and miss an extra race the > penalty can be something crazy like14, when normally half that > number of > boats race. > > As we don't have or enforce a rigorous registration process I am for > counting DNC and DNS the same per Osman's recommendation. > > As it stands now, I don't think anyone who is actually serious > about racing > takes any of the Over all cruising fleet trophies seriously. > Most just race > on Wednesday and that is what they are in it for. > > Eric > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:15 PM, David Otterbein > wrote: > > Os, > > The scoring program does all the proper scoring automaticly, > it really > > can't get any easier. > > > > dave > > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Gary Tenenbaum > wrote:> > >> ** > >> Lee is pretty close on this issue. However, consider that > the fleet may > >> amend Appendix 'A' in any way it chooses so long as it is > stated in the > >> sailing instructions. In this case, because the fleet sails > in several > >> regattas and series that are controlled by various sailing > instructions,>> and each sailing instruction notes that the > fleet will determine its own > >> scoring, you can choose any method you want without further > notice in the > >> SIs. > >> > >> Most of the fleets at NBC (if not all) award an average score > to a > >> competitor that does not compete because the owner or skipper > of that boat > >> is working on Race Committee, Race Patrol or an away regatta > or series or > >> qualifying race. I suggest you to add this to your scoring > system as it > >> encourages Cruising Fleet members to participate in the above noted > >> situation. > >> > >> If you divide your season series into smaller segments, it is > easier and > >> more equitable to apply various scoring penalties, i.e. a > boat that cannot > >> compete in the spring may be able to sail the rest of the > season but will > >> start the summer with a considerable number of points. > >> > >> Please note the recommendation after Rule A11 and consider > utilizing some > >> of the ideas. > >> > >> Gary > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> *From:* Lee Luce > >> *To:* 'Osman Coskun Kurtulus' ; > >> wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org ; > >> wednightracing@nyackboatclub.org > >> *Sent:* Sunday, March 24, 2013 11:47 PM > >> *Subject:* Re: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for > Cruising>> Fleet > >> > >> To All -**** > >> > >> I am very concerned that the proposed scoring system for 2013 > outlined in > >> Osman's e-mail below does not follow the *U.S. Racing Rules > of Sailing* " > >> *for a series longer than a regatta*". **** > >> > >> Please see Rule A9 of the 2013-2016 rules: "*A boat that did > not come to > >> the starting area shall be scored points for the finishing > place one more > >> than the number of boats entered in the series."* **** > >> > >> A boat that is registered for a Regatta, but does not race is > termed DNS > >> (Did Not Start). A DNS is scored one more than the number of > starters (same > >> as the number of boats registered for that regatta).**** > >> > >> A group of races held longer than a regatta is termed a > *series*.****>> > >> A boat that is registered for *more than a regatta *(such as the > >> Wednesday Night series, the Sunday series, etc.), but does > not race is > >> termed DNC (Did Not Compete). A DNC is scored one more than > the number > >> registered.**** > >> > >> The number of boats "entered in the series" are defined as > the number of > >> registered boats for that series. **** > >> > >> Likewise, a Did Not Finish (DNF) is scored "*one more than > the number of > >> boats that came to the starting area**"*. Thus if 4 boats > start the race > >> and one boat gets a DNF, her score shall be 5. The proposed > scoring system > >> would award a DNF score equal to last place in that race.**** > >> > >> Please think about why these rules are written the way they > are. We use > >> the low point scoring system. The fewer points you > accumulate, the better. > >> The proposed method minimizes the scoring penalty for a boat > that does not > >> race. The *same number of points* are awarded for a boat that gets > >> disqualified (DSQ), does not start (DNS), does not compete > (DNC), and does > >> not finish (DNF) the race. Are we sure we want that? Are we > sure want to go > >> against the *U.S. Rules of Sailing*?**** > >> > >> Lastly, please see the *Telltale* article from August 2012 > detailing how > >> all of the fleets at Nyack score their races. While there are some > >> differences (such as which home or away regattas are included > in year-end > >> scoring), all of the Fleets abide by the scoring rules of > U.S. Sailing. I > >> strongly believe the Cruising Fleet should do the same.**** > >> > >> I am encouraged that the Club Trophy in 2013 will be awarded > based on all > >> of the NBC Cruising Fleet racing events, not just Wednesday > Night racing. > >> **** > >> > >> Lee Luce**** > >> > >> Cruising Fleet Secretary**** > >> > >> ** ** > >> > >> ** ** > >> > >> *From:* Wednightracing [mailto: > >> wednightracing-bounces@maillist.nyackboatclub.org] *On Behalf > Of *Osman > >> Coskun Kurtulus > >> *Sent:* Sunday, March 24, 2013 8:17 PM > >> *To:* wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org; > >> wednightracing@nyackboatclub.org > >> *Subject:* [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for > Cruising Fleet* > >> *** > >> > >> ** ** > >> > >> Hello Racers,**** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> While we are getting excited about the coming up season, I > wanted to get > >> your input on couple of notions that we have been > contemplating. **** > >> > >> I have discussed these with several frequent racers, a soft > committee per > >> se; and the following changes which we propose to improve our > scoring>> system and awarding our trophies for 2013 racing season.**** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> *TROPHIES:***** > >> > >> *CLUB Trophy* **** > >> > >> This trophy is awarded to each fleet by the club and covers > >> the entire season. We will score this with the combination of > the following > >> races/regattas,**** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> *Wednesday Night Series***** > >> > >> *+***** > >> > >> *Sunday Series***** > >> > >> *+***** > >> > >> *Memorial Day Regatta***** > >> > >> *Guy Multon Regatta***** > >> > >> *Labor Day Regatta***** > >> > >> *NBC Last Chance Regatta***** > >> > >> *Hudson River Long Distance Race***** > >> > >> ** ** > >> > >> *CRUISING FLEET Sunday Series Trophy***** > >> > >> This trophy is for our own fleet's award and we will score > this based on > >> the following races/regattas,**** > >> > >> *Sunday Series only***** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> *CRUISING FLEET Wednesday Night Series Trophy***** > >> > >> This trophy is for our own fleet's award and we will score > this based on > >> the following races/regattas,**** > >> > >> *Wednesday Night Series only***** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> *SCORING:***** > >> > >> Eric Baumes will be the official Scorer for the Cruising > Fleet. (I will > >> be his back up at his absence)**** > >> > >> ** ** > >> > >> We will score the boats Did Not Start (DNS) number of starts > + 1**** > >> > >> We will score the boats Did Not Finish (DNF) last place (4 > boats start in > >> any race and each DNF will be scored 4)**** > >> > >> We will score the boats Disqualified (DSQ) number of starts + 1**** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> So what say you?**** > >> > >> Please say *YES* or *NO* by replying to this email to me, so > that I can > >> tally the votes to move forward.**** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> Best**** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> Osman Kurtulus**** > >> > >> Cruising Fleet Captain (Racing) **** > >> > >> ** ** > >> > >> (917)-774-7454 <tel:%28917%29-774-7454> **** > >> > >> ------------------------------ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wednightracing mailing list > >> Wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org > >> > >> > http://maillist.nyackboatclub.org/mailman/listinfo/wednightracing_maillist.n yackboatclub.org>> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wednightracing mailing list > >> Wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org > >> > >> > http://maillist.nyackboatclub.org/mailman/listinfo/wednightracing_maillist.n yackboatclub.org>> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wednightracing mailing list > > Wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org > > > > > http://maillist.nyackboatclub.org/mailman/listinfo/wednightracing_maillist.n yackboatclub.org> > > >
LL
Lee Luce
Wed, Mar 27, 2013 3:18 PM

When I report statistics, I try to be fair and look at the whole picture,
not just a segment. But, as requested, attached is a break-down of Wednesday
and Sunday racing frequency. I leave everyone to come their own statistical
conclusions. In my opinion implying that Sunday racing is unpopular is
silly, and the numbers bear that out.

I believe the Lasers race both Tuesdays and Sundays.

The proposal to count Sunday racing only when there is no Wednesday racing
seems unfair. Sunday racing is scheduled from the 1st week in May until the
3rd week in September. That leaves five weeks of Sunday racing when there is
no Wednesday racing. Huh?

As far as vacation time goes, the U.S. Racing Rules of Sailing specify a
number of throw-outs per season (five TOs in the 2012 season I believe).
That should cover anyone who worries about taking vacation time and losing
an opportunity to race.

I wish we would stop trying to skew the rules. The low-point scoring rules
have been established for a long time and work well for all of the other
fleets. The Club bestows trophies for each fleet based on racing results
from the entire sailing season. The Fleet trophies are awarded based on
series within that season (Wednesday nights, Sundays, Spring, Fall). The
conflict comes when some want to minimalize all racing except Wednesday
night. For those who work and can't make the start time on Wednesdays, that
seems blatantly unfair.

Lee

From: Carmen and Ruth Yannelli [mailto:ruthcarm@optonline.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 12:32 AM
To: 'Lee Luce'; 'Eric Baumes'; 'Gary Tenenbaum'; 'Osman Kurtulus'; 'Cruising
Fleet Racers'
Subject: RE: Cruising Fleet Statistics

All,

It's funny how one can use statistics to paint any picture they want.
Without the benefit of having the numbers in front of me,  I have to ask a
question. If one were to break down the numbers by Wednesday night and
Sunday afternoons instead of by the total number of races,  how do the
percentages compare?  Based on the few details Lee shared,  I would bet it
shows that people don't give a rat's you know what about Sundays,  but they
really enjoy their Wednesday nights.

That said,  I'll share with everyone else the idea I sent to Lee earlier
because I believe it is a fair compromise.

Count the Sunday races and regattas only when there is no Wednesday night
racing.  This approach counts the events with the higher participation
percentages,  gives us roughly the same number of days as the one designs
and gives everyone the opportunity to take cruises with our cruising boats
over summer weekends.  We can still have starts on Sundays when there is
Wednesday night racing,  we would just not include them in the overall
scoring.

No other fleet has racing two days a week on a regular basis.  It's flat out
crazy to expect anyone with a job and/or family to commit to racing two days
a week thru the summer.  Forget about trying to get a crew of 7 or 8 to
commit to 50 dates over roughly 25 weeks.  Setting the bar so high that only
a few can realistically achieve it does nothing to entice the rest of us to
participate.  In fact, it has the opposite effect.

Our goal here should be to come up with a system that is fair to everyone
who wants to participate, not just the few who can race in 50 events or the
few who only want to race on Wednesdays.

Carmen

From: Lee Luce [mailto:luce01@optonline.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 10:49 PM
To: 'Carmen and Ruth Yannelli'; 'Eric Baumes'; 'Gary Tenenbaum'; 'Osman
Kurtulus'; 'Cruising Fleet Racers'
Subject: Cruising Fleet Statistics

To All -

Attached are the racing statistics from 2012 for our Cruising Fleet.

Some highlights:

There were 50 races scheduled, but only 28 races were completed (not
including HRYRA events).

Eighteen races were canceled due to no wind, or bad weather.

Four race days had good wind, but no Cruising Fleet boats showed up on the
starting line.

The A Division spinnaker boats raced only on Wednesdays. If they raced on
Sundays it was in the non-spinnaker divisions.

All races had a minimum of three boats on the starting line.

Fifteen boats raced on Sundays, 27 boats raced on Wednesdays. Four boats who
raced on Sundays did not race on Wednesdays.

Ten boats were listed in the spinnaker A Division, thus a DNC (Did not
Compete) = 11.

Fifteen boats were listed in the non-spinnaker C Division (PHRF < 187), thus
a DNC = 16.

Six boats were listed in the non-spinnaker D Division (PHRF > 187), thus a
DNC = 7.

Racing Frequency

As you can see from the data, the highest frequency of racing was in the D
Division (64%); the lowest frequency of racing was in the spinnaker A
Division (41%).

Only three boats attained 60% or greater frequency of racing.

The average frequency of racing was: A Division -  23.9%, C Division 30.0%,
D Division 45.8%.

Nine boats (out of 31) raced in less than 5 races. Those boats with the
smallest racing percentage were all in the spinnaker A Division because they
did not race on Sundays.

Lee's recommendations (for what it's worth)

  1. Honor and use the U.S. Racing Rules of Sailing for scoring. 
    
  2. Request all racers register by getting a PHRF before May 1st, and
    

announce the PHRF scoring divisions before the first race on May 5th.
(Suggestion: within the non-spinnaker group, three divisions might be
considered for smaller divisions to improve competition, not two.)

  1. Require all scored racers to be paid members of the Cruising Fleet by
    

the time they start racing.

  1. According to the NBC Sailing Instructions, three boats must race to
    

have a fleet start. (Less than three boats on the starting line must start
with the Open Fleet.) As in the past, if three boats race but only one
completes the course in the allotted time, all boats are scored. Likewise,
if only one boat completes the race course, that boat receives a score and
is not penalized because no other competitor shows up. In other words, while
you need three boats to have a starting gun from the race Committee, only
one boat needs to run the course for the race to count.

  1. A boat should complete a minimum of 10% of the races scheduled to be
    

considered a registered boat. Remember, the lower the percentage, the more
you encourage racers to come out and try.

  1. Boats that compete in HRYRA races may receive an average of their
    

annual scores at NBC for the races missed at Nyack, if a Nyack race is held.
The Around Long Island Race should not be considered part of the Nyack
racing venue, and boats competing in that race should not receive an average
of their score.

  1. Skippers that volunteer time on the Race Committee and Race Patrol,
    

not as part of their Club duty obligation, may receive an average of their
annual score for that race.

  1. As proposed, the annual Club trophy should be determined by
    

performance in all Cruising Fleet venues for 2013 including Sunday, Regatta,
and Wednesday Night racing. Plus see #6 above for HRYRA racing to be
included.

  1. In addition, Fleet trophies should be awarded for Sunday, Wednesday
    

Night, Spring Series and Fall Series competitions.

I notice that most of these e-mails below strongly represent members who
race (or crew) in the spinnaker A Division, roughly one-third of those who
race in the Cruising fleet. Could it be that these members pull their crew
from one-design racers in the Club, and so have a vested interest in not
racing on weekends? If this observation offends, I apologize. But one would
be remiss not to mention it.

Lee Luce

Cruising Fleet Secretary

From: Carmen and Ruth Yannelli [mailto:ruthcarm@optonline.net]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 10:19 PM
To: 'Eric Baumes'; luce01@optonline.net; 'Gary Tenenbaum'; 'Osman Kurtulus';
'Cruising Fleet Racers'
Subject: RE: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for Cruising Fleet

A couple of thoughts, I like the idea of a boat having to compete in a
minimum number of races to be scored for the overall trophy.  I also like
the idea of a minimum number of boats on the line for a race to count
towards the season standings.  I would suggest a 60/40  rule,  you have to
race in 60% of the races in order to be counted in the scoring and a race
will only count if 40% of the fleet (those that raced in 60% of the races)
showed up.  This could lead to a lot of suspense at the end of the season
trying to figure out who won the award,  but we have a few months to figure
it out...  This solves a couple of problems without setting things in stone.
The debate over which races to include goes away,  if boats show up on a
given day the race counts,  if they don't show up it does not count. It's
very simple and reflects the will of the fleet to show up and race.  I think
in the long run this would build participation in Sundays, maybe not
everyone at once,  but a few boats at a time. The other problem solved is
the penalty for missing a race. Assume that 10 boats race over the course of
the season in a given fleet,  but 4 of them only race in a handful of races.
The penalty for missing a race would be 6 + 1 not 10 +1, because boats 7, 8,
9 and 10 would not be counted towards the overall scoring.

As far as the PHRF certificates and fleet membership are concerned,  out of
courtesy to the sucker who has to handle all of the scoring,  get your PHRF
certificates and pay your fleet dues before the season begins.  It only
creates more work for the guy that's volunteering his time to do the
scoring.

Lastly,  as far as HRYRA and other races (ALIR/Vineyard/etc) are concerned,
I feel that we should be supporting the folks who are trying to step up
their game and are representing our club in these events.  Consider giving
an average score for a boat that ventures out to these venues.  Other fleets
in the club do the same thing for boats that are traveling.  You could also
count these boats towards the minimum on any given day and may find out that
more races count because we are including more boats in the scoring.

Carmen

From: Wednightracing
[mailto:wednightracing-bounces@maillist.nyackboatclub.org] On Behalf Of Eric
Baumes
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 6:40 PM
To: luce01@optonline.net; Gary Tenenbaum; Osman Kurtulus; Cruising Fleet
Racers
Subject: Re: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for Cruising Fleet

As Gary pointed out we can modify Appendix A at will we do it all the time.
I think anyone last year could have asked for redress in scoring as boats
that did not "register" regularly sailed and were scored.

As for Wed vs. Sun vs. Holiday regattas I think tradition has to look at
reality. 3-4x more boats race wednesday than Sunday and the turnout for
Holiday regattas for cruising boats is not any better. Tradition is great,
but the shift towards weekday vespers series for big boat racing is a
national phenomenon. Economics, shifting demographics and family commitments
are changing the nature of the sport and how people play it. We can either
change with the times or continue fight it.

I have raced on and off on sundays at the club since 2004, and there have
never been more than a handful of boats on the line. When I was racing with
Jack Yates, often time is was just us and Lipscomb. I think we should have a
cruising start on Sunday, but I don't know if it is what people think of
when they think of cruising fleet (PHRF) racing at the club. Perhaps we
should listen to the numbers and the participants.

Finally I take umbrage at the insinuation that I would score counter to the
RRS as modified by the NoR or SIs. I am however as far as I know still
entitled to an opinion.

Sincerely,

E. A. Baumes

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:29 PM, luce01@optonline.net wrote:

Eric -

I would like to point out that if you, as appointed head scorer, insist on
"I am for counting DNC and DNS the same per Osman's recommendation" then
any racer may legitimately protest and request the race results be thrown
out because the scoring does not conform to the Racing Rules of Sailing. The
SIs are clear that we sail under the RRS, but the fleets are responsible for
their own scoring. That doesn't mean anyone has authority to change the
rules at will.

You are, of course, correct that the PHRF divisions last year were horribly
out of whack leading to great scoring inequities, especially in the C
division. I strongly suggest that attention be paid to a more equal set of
PHRF divisions (for example, no more than 8 boats per division), and that
the fleet decide the minimum number of races a boat must complete to be
counted in series scoring. These rules should be in effect before the start
of the racing season.

I am quite pained that anyone would think that regatta or Sunday racing
should not be taken seriously. This is the heart, and historic core-being,
of our Club. You must remember than some members work during the week and
can't make a 6:30 pm start time on Wednesday nights. But most people can
race on Sundays if they choose.

Lee

----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Baumes
Date: Monday, March 25, 2013 1:47 pm
Subject: Re: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for Cruising Fleet

To: David Otterbein
Cc: wednightracing@nyackboatclub.org,
wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org

My 2 cents.

One of the problems we have with scoring the long series is the
fact that
many boats show up for a race or two, then don't come back. Or boats
register for the 'series' then don't race.

What then happens is the DNC - number of registrants plus one
can become an
onerous penalty. If you exceed throw outs and miss an extra race the
penalty can be something crazy like14, when normally half that
number of
boats race.

As we don't have or enforce a rigorous registration process I am for
counting DNC and DNS the same per Osman's recommendation.

As it stands now, I don't think anyone who is actually serious
about racing
takes any of the Over all cruising fleet trophies seriously.
Most just race
on Wednesday and that is what they are in it for.

Eric

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:15 PM, David Otterbein

wrote:

Os,
The scoring program does all the proper scoring automaticly,

it really

can't get any easier.

dave

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Gary Tenenbaum

wrote:>

**

Lee is pretty close on this issue. However, consider that

the fleet may

amend Appendix 'A' in any way it chooses so long as it is

stated in the

sailing instructions. In this case, because the fleet sails

in several

regattas and series that are controlled by various sailing

instructions,>> and each sailing instruction notes that the
fleet will determine its own

scoring, you can choose any method you want without further

notice in the

SIs.

Most of the fleets at NBC (if not all) award an average score

to a

competitor that does not compete because the owner or skipper

of that boat

is working on Race Committee, Race Patrol or an away regatta

or series or

qualifying race. I suggest you to add this to your scoring

system as it

encourages Cruising Fleet members to participate in the above noted
situation.

If you divide your season series into smaller segments, it is

easier and

more equitable to apply various scoring penalties, i.e. a

boat that cannot

compete in the spring may be able to sail the rest of the

season but will

start the summer with a considerable number of points.

Please note the recommendation after Rule A11 and consider

utilizing some

of the ideas.

Gary

----- Original Message -----

From: Lee Luce
To: 'Osman Coskun Kurtulus' ;
wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org ;
wednightracing@nyackboatclub.org
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for

Cruising>> Fleet

To All -****

I am very concerned that the proposed scoring system for 2013

outlined in

Osman's e-mail below does not follow the *U.S. Racing Rules

of Sailing* "

for a series longer than a regatta". ****

Please see Rule A9 of the 2013-2016 rules: "*A boat that did

not come to

the starting area shall be scored points for the finishing

place one more

than the number of boats entered in the series."* ****

A boat that is registered for a Regatta, but does not race is

termed DNS

(Did Not Start). A DNS is scored one more than the number of

starters (same

as the number of boats registered for that regatta).****

A group of races held longer than a regatta is termed a

series.****>>

A boat that is registered for *more than a regatta *(such as the

Wednesday Night series, the Sunday series, etc.), but does

not race is

termed DNC (Did Not Compete). A DNC is scored one more than

the number

registered.****

The number of boats "entered in the series" are defined as

the number of

registered boats for that series. ****

Likewise, a Did Not Finish (DNF) is scored "*one more than

the number of

boats that came to the starting area**"*. Thus if 4 boats

start the race

and one boat gets a DNF, her score shall be 5. The proposed

scoring system

would award a DNF score equal to last place in that race.****

Please think about why these rules are written the way they

are. We use

the low point scoring system. The fewer points you

accumulate, the better.

The proposed method minimizes the scoring penalty for a boat

that does not

race. The same number of points are awarded for a boat that gets

disqualified (DSQ), does not start (DNS), does not compete

(DNC), and does

not finish (DNF) the race. Are we sure we want that? Are we

sure want to go

against the U.S. Rules of Sailing?****

Lastly, please see the Telltale article from August 2012

detailing how

all of the fleets at Nyack score their races. While there are some
differences (such as which home or away regattas are included

in year-end

scoring), all of the Fleets abide by the scoring rules of

U.S. Sailing. I

strongly believe the Cruising Fleet should do the same.****

I am encouraged that the Club Trophy in 2013 will be awarded

based on all

of the NBC Cruising Fleet racing events, not just Wednesday

Night racing.


Lee Luce****

Cruising Fleet Secretary****



From: Wednightracing [mailto:
wednightracing-bounces@maillist.nyackboatclub.org] *On Behalf

Of *Osman

Coskun Kurtulus
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 8:17 PM
To: wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org;
wednightracing@nyackboatclub.org
Subject: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for

Cruising Fleet*



Hello Racers,****


While we are getting excited about the coming up season, I

wanted to get

your input on couple of notions that we have been

contemplating. ****

I have discussed these with several frequent racers, a soft

committee per

se; and the following changes which we propose to improve our

scoring>> system and awarding our trophies for 2013 racing season.****


TROPHIES:****

CLUB Trophy ****

This trophy is awarded to each fleet by the club and covers
the entire season. We will score this with the combination of

the following

races/regattas,****


Wednesday Night Series****

+****

Sunday Series****

+****

Memorial Day Regatta****

Guy Multon Regatta****

Labor Day Regatta****

NBC Last Chance Regatta****

Hudson River Long Distance Race****


CRUISING FLEET Sunday Series Trophy****

This trophy is for our own fleet's award and we will score

this based on

the following races/regattas,****

Sunday Series only****


CRUISING FLEET Wednesday Night Series Trophy****

This trophy is for our own fleet's award and we will score

this based on

the following races/regattas,****

Wednesday Night Series only****


SCORING:****

Eric Baumes will be the official Scorer for the Cruising

Fleet. (I will

be his back up at his absence)****


We will score the boats Did Not Start (DNS) number of starts

  • 1****

We will score the boats Did Not Finish (DNF) last place (4

boats start in

any race and each DNF will be scored 4)****

We will score the boats Disqualified (DSQ) number of starts + 1****



So what say you?****

Please say YES or NO by replying to this email to me, so

that I can

tally the votes to move forward.****


Best****


Osman Kurtulus****

Cruising Fleet Captain (Racing) ****


(917)-774-7454 tel:%28917%29-774-7454 ****



Wednightracing mailing list
Wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org


Wednightracing mailing list
Wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org


Wednightracing mailing list
Wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org

When I report statistics, I try to be fair and look at the whole picture, not just a segment. But, as requested, attached is a break-down of Wednesday and Sunday racing frequency. I leave everyone to come their own statistical conclusions. In my opinion implying that Sunday racing is unpopular is silly, and the numbers bear that out. I believe the Lasers race both Tuesdays and Sundays. The proposal to count Sunday racing only when there is no Wednesday racing seems unfair. Sunday racing is scheduled from the 1st week in May until the 3rd week in September. That leaves five weeks of Sunday racing when there is no Wednesday racing. Huh? As far as vacation time goes, the U.S. Racing Rules of Sailing specify a number of throw-outs per season (five TOs in the 2012 season I believe). That should cover anyone who worries about taking vacation time and losing an opportunity to race. I wish we would stop trying to skew the rules. The low-point scoring rules have been established for a long time and work well for all of the other fleets. The Club bestows trophies for each fleet based on racing results from the entire sailing season. The Fleet trophies are awarded based on series within that season (Wednesday nights, Sundays, Spring, Fall). The conflict comes when some want to minimalize all racing except Wednesday night. For those who work and can't make the start time on Wednesdays, that seems blatantly unfair. Lee From: Carmen and Ruth Yannelli [mailto:ruthcarm@optonline.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 12:32 AM To: 'Lee Luce'; 'Eric Baumes'; 'Gary Tenenbaum'; 'Osman Kurtulus'; 'Cruising Fleet Racers' Subject: RE: Cruising Fleet Statistics All, It's funny how one can use statistics to paint any picture they want. Without the benefit of having the numbers in front of me, I have to ask a question. If one were to break down the numbers by Wednesday night and Sunday afternoons instead of by the total number of races, how do the percentages compare? Based on the few details Lee shared, I would bet it shows that people don't give a rat's you know what about Sundays, but they really enjoy their Wednesday nights. That said, I'll share with everyone else the idea I sent to Lee earlier because I believe it is a fair compromise. Count the Sunday races and regattas only when there is no Wednesday night racing. This approach counts the events with the higher participation percentages, gives us roughly the same number of days as the one designs and gives everyone the opportunity to take cruises with our cruising boats over summer weekends. We can still have starts on Sundays when there is Wednesday night racing, we would just not include them in the overall scoring. No other fleet has racing two days a week on a regular basis. It's flat out crazy to expect anyone with a job and/or family to commit to racing two days a week thru the summer. Forget about trying to get a crew of 7 or 8 to commit to 50 dates over roughly 25 weeks. Setting the bar so high that only a few can realistically achieve it does nothing to entice the rest of us to participate. In fact, it has the opposite effect. Our goal here should be to come up with a system that is fair to everyone who wants to participate, not just the few who can race in 50 events or the few who only want to race on Wednesdays. Carmen From: Lee Luce [mailto:luce01@optonline.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 10:49 PM To: 'Carmen and Ruth Yannelli'; 'Eric Baumes'; 'Gary Tenenbaum'; 'Osman Kurtulus'; 'Cruising Fleet Racers' Subject: Cruising Fleet Statistics To All - Attached are the racing statistics from 2012 for our Cruising Fleet. Some highlights: There were 50 races scheduled, but only 28 races were completed (not including HRYRA events). Eighteen races were canceled due to no wind, or bad weather. Four race days had good wind, but no Cruising Fleet boats showed up on the starting line. The A Division spinnaker boats raced only on Wednesdays. If they raced on Sundays it was in the non-spinnaker divisions. All races had a minimum of three boats on the starting line. Fifteen boats raced on Sundays, 27 boats raced on Wednesdays. Four boats who raced on Sundays did not race on Wednesdays. Ten boats were listed in the spinnaker A Division, thus a DNC (Did not Compete) = 11. Fifteen boats were listed in the non-spinnaker C Division (PHRF < 187), thus a DNC = 16. Six boats were listed in the non-spinnaker D Division (PHRF > 187), thus a DNC = 7. Racing Frequency As you can see from the data, the highest frequency of racing was in the D Division (64%); the lowest frequency of racing was in the spinnaker A Division (41%). Only three boats attained 60% or greater frequency of racing. The average frequency of racing was: A Division - 23.9%, C Division 30.0%, D Division 45.8%. Nine boats (out of 31) raced in less than 5 races. Those boats with the smallest racing percentage were all in the spinnaker A Division because they did not race on Sundays. Lee's recommendations (for what it's worth) 1) Honor and use the U.S. Racing Rules of Sailing for scoring. 2) Request all racers register by getting a PHRF before May 1st, and announce the PHRF scoring divisions before the first race on May 5th. (Suggestion: within the non-spinnaker group, three divisions might be considered for smaller divisions to improve competition, not two.) 3) Require all scored racers to be paid members of the Cruising Fleet by the time they start racing. 4) According to the NBC Sailing Instructions, three boats must race to have a fleet start. (Less than three boats on the starting line must start with the Open Fleet.) As in the past, if three boats race but only one completes the course in the allotted time, all boats are scored. Likewise, if only one boat completes the race course, that boat receives a score and is not penalized because no other competitor shows up. In other words, while you need three boats to have a starting gun from the race Committee, only one boat needs to run the course for the race to count. 5) A boat should complete a minimum of 10% of the races scheduled to be considered a registered boat. Remember, the lower the percentage, the more you encourage racers to come out and try. 6) Boats that compete in HRYRA races may receive an average of their annual scores at NBC for the races missed at Nyack, if a Nyack race is held. The Around Long Island Race should not be considered part of the Nyack racing venue, and boats competing in that race should not receive an average of their score. 7) Skippers that volunteer time on the Race Committee and Race Patrol, not as part of their Club duty obligation, may receive an average of their annual score for that race. 8) As proposed, the annual Club trophy should be determined by performance in all Cruising Fleet venues for 2013 including Sunday, Regatta, and Wednesday Night racing. Plus see #6 above for HRYRA racing to be included. 9) In addition, Fleet trophies should be awarded for Sunday, Wednesday Night, Spring Series and Fall Series competitions. I notice that most of these e-mails below strongly represent members who race (or crew) in the spinnaker A Division, roughly one-third of those who race in the Cruising fleet. Could it be that these members pull their crew from one-design racers in the Club, and so have a vested interest in not racing on weekends? If this observation offends, I apologize. But one would be remiss not to mention it. Lee Luce Cruising Fleet Secretary From: Carmen and Ruth Yannelli [mailto:ruthcarm@optonline.net] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 10:19 PM To: 'Eric Baumes'; luce01@optonline.net; 'Gary Tenenbaum'; 'Osman Kurtulus'; 'Cruising Fleet Racers' Subject: RE: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for Cruising Fleet A couple of thoughts, I like the idea of a boat having to compete in a minimum number of races to be scored for the overall trophy. I also like the idea of a minimum number of boats on the line for a race to count towards the season standings. I would suggest a 60/40 rule, you have to race in 60% of the races in order to be counted in the scoring and a race will only count if 40% of the fleet (those that raced in 60% of the races) showed up. This could lead to a lot of suspense at the end of the season trying to figure out who won the award, but we have a few months to figure it out... This solves a couple of problems without setting things in stone. The debate over which races to include goes away, if boats show up on a given day the race counts, if they don't show up it does not count. It's very simple and reflects the will of the fleet to show up and race. I think in the long run this would build participation in Sundays, maybe not everyone at once, but a few boats at a time. The other problem solved is the penalty for missing a race. Assume that 10 boats race over the course of the season in a given fleet, but 4 of them only race in a handful of races. The penalty for missing a race would be 6 + 1 not 10 +1, because boats 7, 8, 9 and 10 would not be counted towards the overall scoring. As far as the PHRF certificates and fleet membership are concerned, out of courtesy to the sucker who has to handle all of the scoring, get your PHRF certificates and pay your fleet dues before the season begins. It only creates more work for the guy that's volunteering his time to do the scoring. Lastly, as far as HRYRA and other races (ALIR/Vineyard/etc) are concerned, I feel that we should be supporting the folks who are trying to step up their game and are representing our club in these events. Consider giving an average score for a boat that ventures out to these venues. Other fleets in the club do the same thing for boats that are traveling. You could also count these boats towards the minimum on any given day and may find out that more races count because we are including more boats in the scoring. Carmen From: Wednightracing [mailto:wednightracing-bounces@maillist.nyackboatclub.org] On Behalf Of Eric Baumes Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 6:40 PM To: luce01@optonline.net; Gary Tenenbaum; Osman Kurtulus; Cruising Fleet Racers Subject: Re: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for Cruising Fleet As Gary pointed out we can modify Appendix A at will we do it all the time. I think anyone last year could have asked for redress in scoring as boats that did not "register" regularly sailed and were scored. As for Wed vs. Sun vs. Holiday regattas I think tradition has to look at reality. 3-4x more boats race wednesday than Sunday and the turnout for Holiday regattas for cruising boats is not any better. Tradition is great, but the shift towards weekday vespers series for big boat racing is a national phenomenon. Economics, shifting demographics and family commitments are changing the nature of the sport and how people play it. We can either change with the times or continue fight it. I have raced on and off on sundays at the club since 2004, and there have never been more than a handful of boats on the line. When I was racing with Jack Yates, often time is was just us and Lipscomb. I think we should have a cruising start on Sunday, but I don't know if it is what people think of when they think of cruising fleet (PHRF) racing at the club. Perhaps we should listen to the numbers and the participants. Finally I take umbrage at the insinuation that I would score counter to the RRS as modified by the NoR or SIs. I am however as far as I know still entitled to an opinion. Sincerely, E. A. Baumes On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:29 PM, <luce01@optonline.net> wrote: Eric - I would like to point out that if you, as appointed head scorer, insist on "I am for counting DNC and DNS the same per Osman's recommendation" then any racer may legitimately protest and request the race results be thrown out because the scoring does not conform to the Racing Rules of Sailing. The SIs are clear that we sail under the RRS, but the fleets are responsible for their own scoring. That doesn't mean anyone has authority to change the rules at will. You are, of course, correct that the PHRF divisions last year were horribly out of whack leading to great scoring inequities, especially in the C division. I strongly suggest that attention be paid to a more equal set of PHRF divisions (for example, no more than 8 boats per division), and that the fleet decide the minimum number of races a boat must complete to be counted in series scoring. These rules should be in effect before the start of the racing season. I am quite pained that anyone would think that regatta or Sunday racing should not be taken seriously. This is the heart, and historic core-being, of our Club. You must remember than some members work during the week and can't make a 6:30 pm start time on Wednesday nights. But most people can race on Sundays if they choose. Lee ----- Original Message ----- From: Eric Baumes Date: Monday, March 25, 2013 1:47 pm Subject: Re: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for Cruising Fleet To: David Otterbein Cc: wednightracing@nyackboatclub.org, wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org > My 2 cents. > > One of the problems we have with scoring the long series is the > fact that > many boats show up for a race or two, then don't come back. Or boats > register for the 'series' then don't race. > > What then happens is the DNC - number of registrants plus one > can become an > onerous penalty. If you exceed throw outs and miss an extra race the > penalty can be something crazy like14, when normally half that > number of > boats race. > > As we don't have or enforce a rigorous registration process I am for > counting DNC and DNS the same per Osman's recommendation. > > As it stands now, I don't think anyone who is actually serious > about racing > takes any of the Over all cruising fleet trophies seriously. > Most just race > on Wednesday and that is what they are in it for. > > Eric > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:15 PM, David Otterbein > wrote: > > Os, > > The scoring program does all the proper scoring automaticly, > it really > > can't get any easier. > > > > dave > > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Gary Tenenbaum > wrote:> > >> ** > >> Lee is pretty close on this issue. However, consider that > the fleet may > >> amend Appendix 'A' in any way it chooses so long as it is > stated in the > >> sailing instructions. In this case, because the fleet sails > in several > >> regattas and series that are controlled by various sailing > instructions,>> and each sailing instruction notes that the > fleet will determine its own > >> scoring, you can choose any method you want without further > notice in the > >> SIs. > >> > >> Most of the fleets at NBC (if not all) award an average score > to a > >> competitor that does not compete because the owner or skipper > of that boat > >> is working on Race Committee, Race Patrol or an away regatta > or series or > >> qualifying race. I suggest you to add this to your scoring > system as it > >> encourages Cruising Fleet members to participate in the above noted > >> situation. > >> > >> If you divide your season series into smaller segments, it is > easier and > >> more equitable to apply various scoring penalties, i.e. a > boat that cannot > >> compete in the spring may be able to sail the rest of the > season but will > >> start the summer with a considerable number of points. > >> > >> Please note the recommendation after Rule A11 and consider > utilizing some > >> of the ideas. > >> > >> Gary > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> *From:* Lee Luce > >> *To:* 'Osman Coskun Kurtulus' ; > >> wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org ; > >> wednightracing@nyackboatclub.org > >> *Sent:* Sunday, March 24, 2013 11:47 PM > >> *Subject:* Re: [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for > Cruising>> Fleet > >> > >> To All -**** > >> > >> I am very concerned that the proposed scoring system for 2013 > outlined in > >> Osman's e-mail below does not follow the *U.S. Racing Rules > of Sailing* " > >> *for a series longer than a regatta*". **** > >> > >> Please see Rule A9 of the 2013-2016 rules: "*A boat that did > not come to > >> the starting area shall be scored points for the finishing > place one more > >> than the number of boats entered in the series."* **** > >> > >> A boat that is registered for a Regatta, but does not race is > termed DNS > >> (Did Not Start). A DNS is scored one more than the number of > starters (same > >> as the number of boats registered for that regatta).**** > >> > >> A group of races held longer than a regatta is termed a > *series*.****>> > >> A boat that is registered for *more than a regatta *(such as the > >> Wednesday Night series, the Sunday series, etc.), but does > not race is > >> termed DNC (Did Not Compete). A DNC is scored one more than > the number > >> registered.**** > >> > >> The number of boats "entered in the series" are defined as > the number of > >> registered boats for that series. **** > >> > >> Likewise, a Did Not Finish (DNF) is scored "*one more than > the number of > >> boats that came to the starting area**"*. Thus if 4 boats > start the race > >> and one boat gets a DNF, her score shall be 5. The proposed > scoring system > >> would award a DNF score equal to last place in that race.**** > >> > >> Please think about why these rules are written the way they > are. We use > >> the low point scoring system. The fewer points you > accumulate, the better. > >> The proposed method minimizes the scoring penalty for a boat > that does not > >> race. The *same number of points* are awarded for a boat that gets > >> disqualified (DSQ), does not start (DNS), does not compete > (DNC), and does > >> not finish (DNF) the race. Are we sure we want that? Are we > sure want to go > >> against the *U.S. Rules of Sailing*?**** > >> > >> Lastly, please see the *Telltale* article from August 2012 > detailing how > >> all of the fleets at Nyack score their races. While there are some > >> differences (such as which home or away regattas are included > in year-end > >> scoring), all of the Fleets abide by the scoring rules of > U.S. Sailing. I > >> strongly believe the Cruising Fleet should do the same.**** > >> > >> I am encouraged that the Club Trophy in 2013 will be awarded > based on all > >> of the NBC Cruising Fleet racing events, not just Wednesday > Night racing. > >> **** > >> > >> Lee Luce**** > >> > >> Cruising Fleet Secretary**** > >> > >> ** ** > >> > >> ** ** > >> > >> *From:* Wednightracing [mailto: > >> wednightracing-bounces@maillist.nyackboatclub.org] *On Behalf > Of *Osman > >> Coskun Kurtulus > >> *Sent:* Sunday, March 24, 2013 8:17 PM > >> *To:* wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org; > >> wednightracing@nyackboatclub.org > >> *Subject:* [CruisingFleetRacing] Trophies and Scoring for > Cruising Fleet* > >> *** > >> > >> ** ** > >> > >> Hello Racers,**** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> While we are getting excited about the coming up season, I > wanted to get > >> your input on couple of notions that we have been > contemplating. **** > >> > >> I have discussed these with several frequent racers, a soft > committee per > >> se; and the following changes which we propose to improve our > scoring>> system and awarding our trophies for 2013 racing season.**** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> *TROPHIES:***** > >> > >> *CLUB Trophy* **** > >> > >> This trophy is awarded to each fleet by the club and covers > >> the entire season. We will score this with the combination of > the following > >> races/regattas,**** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> *Wednesday Night Series***** > >> > >> *+***** > >> > >> *Sunday Series***** > >> > >> *+***** > >> > >> *Memorial Day Regatta***** > >> > >> *Guy Multon Regatta***** > >> > >> *Labor Day Regatta***** > >> > >> *NBC Last Chance Regatta***** > >> > >> *Hudson River Long Distance Race***** > >> > >> ** ** > >> > >> *CRUISING FLEET Sunday Series Trophy***** > >> > >> This trophy is for our own fleet's award and we will score > this based on > >> the following races/regattas,**** > >> > >> *Sunday Series only***** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> *CRUISING FLEET Wednesday Night Series Trophy***** > >> > >> This trophy is for our own fleet's award and we will score > this based on > >> the following races/regattas,**** > >> > >> *Wednesday Night Series only***** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> *SCORING:***** > >> > >> Eric Baumes will be the official Scorer for the Cruising > Fleet. (I will > >> be his back up at his absence)**** > >> > >> ** ** > >> > >> We will score the boats Did Not Start (DNS) number of starts > + 1**** > >> > >> We will score the boats Did Not Finish (DNF) last place (4 > boats start in > >> any race and each DNF will be scored 4)**** > >> > >> We will score the boats Disqualified (DSQ) number of starts + 1**** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> So what say you?**** > >> > >> Please say *YES* or *NO* by replying to this email to me, so > that I can > >> tally the votes to move forward.**** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> Best**** > >> > >> **** > >> > >> Osman Kurtulus**** > >> > >> Cruising Fleet Captain (Racing) **** > >> > >> ** ** > >> > >> (917)-774-7454 <tel:%28917%29-774-7454> **** > >> > >> ------------------------------ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wednightracing mailing list > >> Wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org > >> > >> > http://maillist.nyackboatclub.org/mailman/listinfo/wednightracing_maillist.n yackboatclub.org>> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wednightracing mailing list > >> Wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org > >> > >> > http://maillist.nyackboatclub.org/mailman/listinfo/wednightracing_maillist.n yackboatclub.org>> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wednightracing mailing list > > Wednightracing@maillist.nyackboatclub.org > > > > > http://maillist.nyackboatclub.org/mailman/listinfo/wednightracing_maillist.n yackboatclub.org> > > >