mvus-list@lists.febo.com

Midwest VHF/UHF Society Mailing List

View all threads

Unknown coax

DS
Dave Sublette
Sat, Sep 23, 2017 1:03 AM

Good evening microwave folks,

Confession time:  I still fool around with HF.  I built a rotary dipole for 40 meters this week — full size.

I’ve been having a discussion on towertalk about feeding it with some sort of an RF choke to keep RF off the shield while transmitting and suppressing common mode noise for receiving — all pretty much straightforward, standard practice.

I seem to have opened a Pandora’s box.  Opinions are flying and options are being discussed.  What it boils down to is a two section choke consisting of a couple turns of RG142 through two mix 31 beads and a repeat of that 10 inches away on the same piece of coax looks to be a very good approach and I would like to try it.

Finding the coax is another story.  Some folks say that RG 400 is better because it has a stranded center conductor whereas the RG142 is solid.  I would agree.  Both are teflon, double shielded and I suspect are used extensively in the microwave world. The stuff I am finding is mainly on eBay and comes from China.  I am dubious about the quality.

So I am soliciting your opinions about where to find surplus RG 400.

On the other hand — digging around in my microwave stuff, I have found some coax that might be a substitute.  It is double shielded, but the center insulating material is clear  I doubt that it is teflon.  One end has what I think is an SMC connector.  The other end is a cutoff.  It is white and the OD is 0.125 inches, smaller than RG142 or 400.  One end had a table on it that says, “ASU 1-3”.  I’m hoping that someone has seen this stuff and knows what type of coax it is.

The HF guys are claiming they can use these RF chokes at a power level of 1.5 KW in the shack on all frequencies in the HF range.  I won’t be running any more than 100 watts, so I’m not concerned about the power rating.

Another option would be for me to wind one of the chokes and test it.  I have a sig gen and spectrum analyzer.  I’m not sure at this moment just how to go about testing it.  The key thing to look for is a high impedance between the ends of the shield at HF frequencies.  I know what the performance is of the RG142/400 chokes.  If I could come close, I would use this “unknown” cable.

Sorry to ramble, but I had to describe the situation.

Dave, K4TO

Good evening microwave folks, Confession time: I still fool around with HF. I built a rotary dipole for 40 meters this week — full size. I’ve been having a discussion on towertalk about feeding it with some sort of an RF choke to keep RF off the shield while transmitting and suppressing common mode noise for receiving — all pretty much straightforward, standard practice. I seem to have opened a Pandora’s box. Opinions are flying and options are being discussed. What it boils down to is a two section choke consisting of a couple turns of RG142 through two mix 31 beads and a repeat of that 10 inches away on the same piece of coax looks to be a very good approach and I would like to try it. Finding the coax is another story. Some folks say that RG 400 is better because it has a stranded center conductor whereas the RG142 is solid. I would agree. Both are teflon, double shielded and I suspect are used extensively in the microwave world. The stuff I am finding is mainly on eBay and comes from China. I am dubious about the quality. So I am soliciting your opinions about where to find surplus RG 400. On the other hand — digging around in my microwave stuff, I have found some coax that might be a substitute. It is double shielded, but the center insulating material is clear I doubt that it is teflon. One end has what I think is an SMC connector. The other end is a cutoff. It is white and the OD is 0.125 inches, smaller than RG142 or 400. One end had a table on it that says, “ASU 1-3”. I’m hoping that someone has seen this stuff and knows what type of coax it is. The HF guys are claiming they can use these RF chokes at a power level of 1.5 KW in the shack on all frequencies in the HF range. I won’t be running any more than 100 watts, so I’m not concerned about the power rating. Another option would be for me to wind one of the chokes and test it. I have a sig gen and spectrum analyzer. I’m not sure at this moment just how to go about testing it. The key thing to look for is a high impedance between the ends of the shield at HF frequencies. I know what the performance is of the RG142/400 chokes. If I could come close, I would use this “unknown” cable. Sorry to ramble, but I had to describe the situation. Dave, K4TO
RM
Randy Midkiff
Sat, Sep 23, 2017 1:17 AM

Hi Dave,
How much you looking for as I still have some RG 400 but my supply is getting low.  I like the 400 for the flexibility and have used Harbour Industries which is a good product.  It is available on fleabay and here is a link. Check it out.

https://www.ebay.com/p/40-Feet-Harbour-Industries-Rg400-M17-128-rg400-RF-Double-Shield-Coaxial-Cable/1848533760

Randy WB8ART

-----Original Message-----
From: mvus-list [mailto:mvus-list-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Dave Sublette via mvus-list
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 9:04 PM
To: Mid-America Microwave Society; David Feldman via Microwave
Cc: Midwest VHF/UHF Society Mailing List
Subject: [mvus-list] Unknown coax

Good evening microwave folks,

Confession time:  I still fool around with HF.  I built a rotary dipole for 40 meters this week � full size.

I�ve been having a discussion on towertalk about feeding it with some sort of an RF choke to keep RF off the shield while transmitting and suppressing common mode noise for receiving � all pretty much straightforward, standard practice.

I seem to have opened a Pandora�s box.  Opinions are flying and options are being discussed.  What it boils down to is a two section choke consisting of a couple turns of RG142 through two mix 31 beads and a repeat of that 10 inches away on the same piece of coax looks to be a very good approach and I would like to try it.

Finding the coax is another story.  Some folks say that RG 400 is better because it has a stranded center conductor whereas the RG142 is solid.  I would agree.  Both are teflon, double shielded and I suspect are used extensively in the microwave world. The stuff I am finding is mainly on eBay and comes from China.  I am dubious about the quality.

So I am soliciting your opinions about where to find surplus RG 400.

On the other hand � digging around in my microwave stuff, I have found some coax that might be a substitute.  It is double shielded, but the center insulating material is clear  I doubt that it is teflon.  One end has what I think is an SMC connector.  The other end is a cutoff.  It is white and the OD is 0.125 inches, smaller than RG142 or 400.  One end had a table on it that says, �ASU 1-3�.  I�m hoping that someone has seen this stuff and knows what type of coax it is.

The HF guys are claiming they can use these RF chokes at a power level of 1.5 KW in the shack on all frequencies in the HF range.  I won�t be running any more than 100 watts, so I�m not concerned about the power rating.

Another option would be for me to wind one of the chokes and test it.  I have a sig gen and spectrum analyzer.  I�m not sure at this moment just how to go about testing it.  The key thing to look for is a high impedance between the ends of the shield at HF frequencies.  I know what the performance is of the RG142/400 chokes.  If I could come close, I would use this �unknown� cable.

Sorry to ramble, but I had to describe the situation.

Dave, K4TO


mvus-list mailing list
mvus-list@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mvus-list

Hi Dave, How much you looking for as I still have some RG 400 but my supply is getting low. I like the 400 for the flexibility and have used Harbour Industries which is a good product. It is available on fleabay and here is a link. Check it out. https://www.ebay.com/p/40-Feet-Harbour-Industries-Rg400-M17-128-rg400-RF-Double-Shield-Coaxial-Cable/1848533760 Randy WB8ART -----Original Message----- From: mvus-list [mailto:mvus-list-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Dave Sublette via mvus-list Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 9:04 PM To: Mid-America Microwave Society; David Feldman via Microwave Cc: Midwest VHF/UHF Society Mailing List Subject: [mvus-list] Unknown coax Good evening microwave folks, Confession time: I still fool around with HF. I built a rotary dipole for 40 meters this week � full size. I�ve been having a discussion on towertalk about feeding it with some sort of an RF choke to keep RF off the shield while transmitting and suppressing common mode noise for receiving � all pretty much straightforward, standard practice. I seem to have opened a Pandora�s box. Opinions are flying and options are being discussed. What it boils down to is a two section choke consisting of a couple turns of RG142 through two mix 31 beads and a repeat of that 10 inches away on the same piece of coax looks to be a very good approach and I would like to try it. Finding the coax is another story. Some folks say that RG 400 is better because it has a stranded center conductor whereas the RG142 is solid. I would agree. Both are teflon, double shielded and I suspect are used extensively in the microwave world. The stuff I am finding is mainly on eBay and comes from China. I am dubious about the quality. So I am soliciting your opinions about where to find surplus RG 400. On the other hand � digging around in my microwave stuff, I have found some coax that might be a substitute. It is double shielded, but the center insulating material is clear I doubt that it is teflon. One end has what I think is an SMC connector. The other end is a cutoff. It is white and the OD is 0.125 inches, smaller than RG142 or 400. One end had a table on it that says, �ASU 1-3�. I�m hoping that someone has seen this stuff and knows what type of coax it is. The HF guys are claiming they can use these RF chokes at a power level of 1.5 KW in the shack on all frequencies in the HF range. I won�t be running any more than 100 watts, so I�m not concerned about the power rating. Another option would be for me to wind one of the chokes and test it. I have a sig gen and spectrum analyzer. I�m not sure at this moment just how to go about testing it. The key thing to look for is a high impedance between the ends of the shield at HF frequencies. I know what the performance is of the RG142/400 chokes. If I could come close, I would use this �unknown� cable. Sorry to ramble, but I had to describe the situation. Dave, K4TO _______________________________________________ mvus-list mailing list mvus-list@febo.com https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mvus-list