oama@lists.imla.org

Oklahoma Association of Municipal Attorneys

View all threads

Re: [Oama] conflict of interest question

TC
Toni Capra
Wed, Mar 11, 2020 3:46 PM
<!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority:99; color:blue; text-decoration:underline;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only;} @page WordSection1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} -->I agree with Mr. Vanderberg, however, In my mind this creates an additional issue: If BoT/Reserve officer remains on the board and there are issues pertaining to the Police Department which come before the board, can he still vote on those issues. Does he benefit? IMO, I would advise the Trustee to abstain from voting on those issues.

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From: Michael R. Vanderburg
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 9:40 PM
To: Kay Wall; OAMA@lists.imla.org
Subject: Re: [Oama] conflict of interest question

This would be considered dual office holding if the Trustee were an officer for any entity other than his/her own town. However, and as a general rule, if the Trustee is not being paid for the second work for the same town, there is no prohibition that I know of which prevents a trustee from being given additional duties, even that of a reserve police officer (assuming that the needed training is in place.)

Just remember, that any reserve officer can generate the same liability for the town as any other police officer and that this liability under federal law can be personal to the officer and not just general to the town. In fact, under 1983 litigation, the federal and personal liability can include punitives which the town is prohibited from indemnifying.

Mike Vanderburg

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From: Kay Wall
Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 2:07 PM
To: OAMA@lists.imla.org
Subject: [Oama] conflict of interest question

Fellow attorneys:

One of my smallest towns has a five-member Town Trustee Board of Government. This Board votes on any and all issues to govern the police chief and the police department.

I have learned that one of the Town Trustees has volunteered to be a reserve police officer (no pay), and is driving (alone) in a police car, wearing a reserve officer badge.

“On patrol”, I would guess.

I have also learned that the Police Chief has scheduled him to attend classes for reserve officers.

In my opinion, this is a great conflict. If I am wrong, it will be a relief, because I will not have to disappoint the police chief and the town trustee, with my advice.

I have asked OMAG, our insurance carrier, for an opinion. Just wondering what some of you think about this situation.

Thoughts?

Kay Wall

918.689.7737 office

KS
Kimberlee Spady
Wed, Mar 11, 2020 3:54 PM

Shouldn’t every action of the Board of Trustees that concerns the PD be taken in the best interests of the PD?

I don’t see how there is a conflict, as long as the issue doesn’t benefit or involve the individual reserve officer/trustee.

We often have trustees/councilmembers who serve as volunteer firefighters.  I’ve advised that there is no need to abstain from voting on matters that concern the volunteer fire department.

I am interested to hear others’ thoughts on this point.

Kim Spady

From: Oama oama-bounces@lists.imla.org On Behalf Of Toni Capra
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 10:47 AM
To: Michael R. Vanderburg mike.vanderburg@sbcglobal.net; Kay Wall lkrw@sbcglobal.net; OAMA@lists.imla.org
Subject: Re: [Oama] conflict of interest question

I agree with Mr. Vanderberg, however, In my mind this creates an additional issue:  If BoT/Reserve officer remains on the board and there are issues pertaining to the Police Department which come before the board, can he still vote on those issues.  Does he benefit?  IMO,  I would advise the Trustee to abstain from voting on those issues.

Sent from Mail https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986  for Windows 10

From: Michael R. Vanderburg mailto:mike.vanderburg@sbcglobal.net
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 9:40 PM
To: Kay Wall mailto:lkrw@sbcglobal.net ; OAMA@lists.imla.org mailto:OAMA@lists.imla.org
Subject: Re: [Oama] conflict of interest question

This would be considered dual office holding if the Trustee were an officer for any entity other than his/her own town. However, and as a general rule, if the Trustee is not being paid for the second work for the same town, there is no prohibition that I know of which prevents a trustee from being given additional duties, even that of a reserve police officer (assuming that the needed training is in place.)

Just remember, that any reserve officer can generate the same liability for the town as any other police officer and that this liability under federal law can be personal to the officer and not just general to the town. In fact, under 1983 litigation, the federal and personal liability can include punitives which the town is prohibited from indemnifying.

Mike Vanderburg

Sent from Mail https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986  for Windows 10

From: Kay Wall mailto:lkrw@sbcglobal.net
Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 2:07 PM
To: OAMA@lists.imla.org mailto:OAMA@lists.imla.org
Subject: [Oama] conflict of interest question

Fellow attorneys:

One of my smallest towns has a five-member Town Trustee Board of Government.  This Board votes on any and all issues to govern the police chief and the police department.

I have learned that one of the Town Trustees has volunteered to be a reserve police officer (no pay), and is driving (alone) in a police car, wearing a reserve officer badge.

“On patrol”, I would guess.

I have also learned that the Police Chief has scheduled him to attend classes for reserve officers.

In my opinion, this is a great conflict.  If I am wrong, it will be a relief, because I will not have to disappoint the police chief and the town trustee, with my advice.

I have asked OMAG, our insurance carrier, for an opinion.  Just wondering what some of you think about this situation.

Thoughts?

Kay Wall

918.689.7737 office

Shouldn’t every action of the Board of Trustees that concerns the PD be taken in the best interests of the PD? I don’t see how there is a conflict, as long as the issue doesn’t benefit or involve the individual reserve officer/trustee. We often have trustees/councilmembers who serve as volunteer firefighters. I’ve advised that there is no need to abstain from voting on matters that concern the volunteer fire department. I am interested to hear others’ thoughts on this point. Kim Spady From: Oama <oama-bounces@lists.imla.org> On Behalf Of Toni Capra Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 10:47 AM To: Michael R. Vanderburg <mike.vanderburg@sbcglobal.net>; Kay Wall <lkrw@sbcglobal.net>; OAMA@lists.imla.org Subject: Re: [Oama] conflict of interest question I agree with Mr. Vanderberg, however, In my mind this creates an additional issue: If BoT/Reserve officer remains on the board and there are issues pertaining to the Police Department which come before the board, can he still vote on those issues. Does he benefit? IMO, I would advise the Trustee to abstain from voting on those issues. Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: Michael R. Vanderburg <mailto:mike.vanderburg@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 9:40 PM To: Kay Wall <mailto:lkrw@sbcglobal.net> ; OAMA@lists.imla.org <mailto:OAMA@lists.imla.org> Subject: Re: [Oama] conflict of interest question This would be considered dual office holding if the Trustee were an officer for any entity other than his/her own town. However, and as a general rule, if the Trustee is not being paid for the second work for the same town, there is no prohibition that I know of which prevents a trustee from being given additional duties, even that of a reserve police officer (assuming that the needed training is in place.) Just remember, that any reserve officer can generate the same liability for the town as any other police officer and that this liability under federal law can be personal to the officer and not just general to the town. In fact, under 1983 litigation, the federal and personal liability can include punitives which the town is prohibited from indemnifying. Mike Vanderburg Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: Kay Wall <mailto:lkrw@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 2:07 PM To: OAMA@lists.imla.org <mailto:OAMA@lists.imla.org> Subject: [Oama] conflict of interest question Fellow attorneys: One of my smallest towns has a five-member Town Trustee Board of Government. This Board votes on any and all issues to govern the police chief and the police department. I have learned that one of the Town Trustees has volunteered to be a reserve police officer (no pay), and is driving (alone) in a police car, wearing a reserve officer badge. “On patrol”, I would guess. I have also learned that the Police Chief has scheduled him to attend classes for reserve officers. In my opinion, this is a great conflict. If I am wrong, it will be a relief, because I will not have to disappoint the police chief and the town trustee, with my advice. I have asked OMAG, our insurance carrier, for an opinion. Just wondering what some of you think about this situation. Thoughts? Kay Wall 918.689.7737 office