Just back from two weeks on the Maine coast aboard our PDQ 34 - this time including the dog. The wide, flat decks proved a boon for the doggie aboard. We've now got a total of 1,453 nautical miles under our keels (since leaving Whitby in Mid-May) and about 175 hours on our engines (more than some 2-year old PDQ's presently on the market!) The boat continues to perform excellently and surprise us with her luxurious accommodations and stingy fuel burn - average for our cruise was 2.8 gal/hr, that's for both engines. Recent photos and more commentary can be found at our website: www.geocities.com/snodoglog. Henry, aboard Sno' Dog in Newington, NH

Henry Clews aboard Sno' Dog wrote: >We've now got a total of 1,453 nautical miles under our keels (since leaving >Whitby in Mid-May) and about 175 hours on our engines . . . boat >continues to perform >excellently and surprise us with her luxurious accommodations and >stingy fuel burn - >average for our cruise was 2.8 gal/hr, that's for both engines. Henry, you're an engineer, aren't you? Why do you figure the PDQ 34 is so efficient through the water and thus so miserly with fuel burn? --Georgs -- Georgs Kolesnikovs Power Catamaran World http://www.powercatamaranworld.com