From Carol Parent:
2/18 & 19 - Winsted, Oak St, between Mountain Ave. & Bank St. - 18 Pine
Grosbeaks feeding in crabapples each day
Winchester, Rt. 263 (Crystal Lake Water Treatment Plant) - 50 American
Robins, 20 Cedar Waxwings feeding in crabapple trees
105 Laurel Way - 3 male Purple Finches at feeders when Barred Owl wasn't
perched on them
126 Laurel Way (Rosgen Wildlife Sanctuary) - 2 Pine Grosbeaks
From Cheryl Hebert:
2/18 - Winchester, 101 Laurel Way - 12 Common Redpolls, 6 Purple Finches
From Dave Rosgen:
2/20 - Winchester, 121 Laurel Way (Rosgen Wildlife Sanctuary) - 1 male
Purple Finch at feeders
126 Laurel Way (Rosgen Wildlife Sanctuary) - 2 Pine Grosbeaks going in to
roost in Spruce stand, 5 p.m.
Rt. 263 (Crystal Lake Water Treatment Plant) - 65 American Robins, 8 Cedar
Waxwings
David Rosgen
Director of Research
White Memorial Conservation Center
P.O. Box 368
Litchfield, CT 06759
860-567-0857
Dear CT Birders,
The Environment Committee is racing towards tomorrow's deadline for introducing bills to be considered this Session. Audubon is urging the Committee to raise a bill that will improve enforcement of the CT Endangered Species Act (CESA) by creating a municipal check-off from the Natural Diversity Database at the local commission level whenever a development is proposed.
We need your help make sure this happens!
PLEASE EMAIL OR CALL COMMITTEE CO-CHAIRS - - SENATOR ED MEYER AND REPRESENTATIVE DICK ROY - - TODAY and ask them to raise this bill in the Environment Committee tomorrow.
-Be polite and thank them for all their work on behalf of the Environment.
-Congratulate Senator Meyer on his appointment to the co-chairmanship. If you are a constituent, let them know.
-If you are a local board or commission member, let them know.
-Use any local examples you may have or consult the attached fact sheet for examples (plain text in a separate email).
-Thank them for their past support by requiring applicants to supply a copy of NDDB map relevant to their proposal to local land use commissions as part of their application. Fact sheet will be sent in a separate email and contact information is below.
Rep. Dick Roy. (Milford)
At the Capitol:
Legislative Office Building, Room 3201
Hartford, CT 06106-1591
(860) 240-8585
1-800-842-8267
In the District:
43 Howe Street
Milford, CT 06460
(203) 878-8030
Senator Ed Meyer (Branford, Durham, Guilford, Killingworth, Madison, North Branford).
E-mail: Meyer@senatedems.ct.govmailto:Meyer@senatedems.ct.gov
Phone: 860-240-0455, or
1-800-842-1420
Patrick Comins, Meriden
The Connecticut Endangered Species Act
History:
The Connecticut Endangered Species Act (CESA), passed in 1989, establishes a program within the DEP to protect vulnerable animals, plants and insects in the state. It is similar to the federal Endangered Species Act, but is based only on the status of the species in Connecticut.
More than 500 plant and animal species are "listed" in one of three categories: endangered, threatened, or special concern. Included on the list are 11 species of mammals, 50 species of birds, 11 species of reptiles, 7 species of amphibians, 7 species of fish, 150 species of insects, and 343 species of plants.
Projects may be required to undergo a Connecticut Endangered Species Act review in order to obtain one of three regulatory approvals:
Problem:
Under the current regulatory framework, information about and requirements to protect endangered species often are not raised until late in the planning or permitting process. This can result in costly delays and revisions for applicants, and less than optimal outcomes for the species affected. This situation could be avoided if information about endangered species were known earlier in the development process.
Some recent examples of projects that have run up against CESA concerns late in the process include:
The development at Rentschler Field and proposed expansions at Bradley Field and several other state airports also involve potential impacts to endangered species.
Unfortunately, DEP has neither the budget nor the staff to survey or even review every proposed development for potential endangered species impact. A new report by the Council on Environmental Quality indicates that, adjusted for inflation, DEP is receiving approximately $10 million less from the General Fund today than it did when it was founded in 1972, and is operating at 1988 staff levels. A nationwide study by the USFWS, ranks Connecticut 48th in the nation in per capita spending on wildlife. By contrast, more than 1 million state residents participate in wildlife-related recreation, generating an estimated $500 million in sales each year and creating almost 8,000 jobs.
Solution:
The DEP maintains an online database of general information about the location of endangered species in each town. A simple and most cost-effective solution is to require each applicant for a local Inland Wetlands or Planning and Zoning permit to consult the DEP online database and submit: (1) a letter stating they have reviewed the online information; and (2) a copy of the relevant map as part of the local regulatory process.
Local commissions would not have any obligation other than to "check off" receipt of this information. The applicant would thus have advance notice of any potential CESA concern, and could, if they choose to do so, pursue the issue with DEP early on in the development process. The burden would be on the proponent of the activity and not on the state or the local commissions. This requirement would be similar to other notification requirements currently enforced by local land use commissions, for example when development is proposed on public water supply watershed.
Purpose:
To protect the natural resources of the State of Connecticut by ensuring that the potential for impacts to endangered species are considered when projects are being proposed.
Patrick Comins, Meriden