time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Thunderbolt & Lady Heather 48 hour precision survey

E
EB4APL
Sat, Nov 27, 2010 5:25 PM

I did a similar error when trying to change the projection reference
system of a map of Guatemala.  After a nonsense output I eventually
found that I had used the wrong sign and the program treated it as it
was Greece.  The resulting map was more or less side looking!.

Regards,
Ignacio, EB4APL

El 27/11/2010 18:01, Rob Kimberley wrote:

Was about half a degree west as far as I can remember. The confusion
occurred (I think - long time ago), because we had to enter a minus figure
for east and a positive for west, and I got the sign wrong.

R

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of jimlux
Sent: 27 November 2010 3:31 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt&  Lady Heather 48 hour precision survey

Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

Of course you do have the excuse that you had to stop and think for a

second as to weather it was east or west of Greenwich ...

Bob

Is it not both?  It was a few degrees west, but a mere 359.5 degrees east.

I did a similar error when trying to change the projection reference system of a map of Guatemala. After a nonsense output I eventually found that I had used the wrong sign and the program treated it as it was Greece. The resulting map was more or less side looking!. Regards, Ignacio, EB4APL El 27/11/2010 18:01, Rob Kimberley wrote: > Was about half a degree west as far as I can remember. The confusion > occurred (I think - long time ago), because we had to enter a minus figure > for east and a positive for west, and I got the sign wrong. > > R > > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On > Behalf Of jimlux > Sent: 27 November 2010 3:31 PM > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt& Lady Heather 48 hour precision survey > > Bob Camp wrote: >> Hi >> >> Of course you *do* have the excuse that you had to stop and think for a > second as to weather it *was* east or west of Greenwich ... >> Bob >> > > Is it not both? It was a few degrees west, but a mere 359.5 degrees east. > >
WH
William H. Fite
Sat, Nov 27, 2010 6:06 PM

Interesting.  I had my tbolt mask set at 10 degrees.  Raised it to 20 and
got the same position but a 60cm difference in altitude.

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Rob Kimberley rk@timing-consultants.comwrote:

Careful setting the elevation mask that low. I wouldn't go below 5 degrees.

I know you want best geometry for best position determination, but there
are
all sorts of effects down at those levels which will degrade your results.

Rob Kimberley

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Robert Darlington
Sent: 26 November 2010 9:23 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt & Lady Heather 48 hour precision
survey

I'm running another test now and it's significantly improved after the 48
hour survey.  Before I'd see several degree swings over the course of an
hour, now it's more like 1.1 degrees in the last 8 hours.  The problem here
is I didn't do anything to the styrofoam box, but the idea was to keep
temperature swings swinging slowly.  For all I know I might be fighting the
Thunderbolt.

I'm running another test under the direction of Warren S. and will post
another screen shot late tonight after I collect about 24 hrs of data with
the elevation mask set to zero degrees.  I'm determined to tune this thing
to be better than it was out of the box!

-Bob

On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Dave hartzell hartzell@gmail.com
wrote:

On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Robert Darlington
<rdarlington@gmail.com

wrote:

I keep it in a styrofoam beer cooler surrounded with bottled water
in a draft free area and it's been all over the map.

Robert-

Are you doing this for temperature stability?  How stable is it?

Dave


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Interesting. I had my tbolt mask set at 10 degrees. Raised it to 20 and got the same position but a 60cm difference in altitude. On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Rob Kimberley <rk@timing-consultants.com>wrote: > Careful setting the elevation mask that low. I wouldn't go below 5 degrees. > > I know you want best geometry for best position determination, but there > are > all sorts of effects down at those levels which will degrade your results. > > Rob Kimberley > > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On > Behalf Of Robert Darlington > Sent: 26 November 2010 9:23 PM > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt & Lady Heather 48 hour precision > survey > > I'm running another test now and it's significantly improved after the 48 > hour survey. Before I'd see several degree swings over the course of an > hour, now it's more like 1.1 degrees in the last 8 hours. The problem here > is I didn't do anything to the styrofoam box, but the idea was to keep > temperature swings swinging slowly. For all I know I might be fighting the > Thunderbolt. > > I'm running another test under the direction of Warren S. and will post > another screen shot late tonight after I collect about 24 hrs of data with > the elevation mask set to zero degrees. I'm determined to tune this thing > to be better than it was out of the box! > > -Bob > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Dave hartzell <hartzell@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Robert Darlington > > <rdarlington@gmail.com > > >wrote: > > > > > I keep it in a styrofoam beer cooler surrounded with bottled water > > > in a draft free area and it's been all over the map. > > > > > > Robert- > > > > Are you doing this for temperature stability? How stable is it? > > > > > > Dave > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to > > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
RK
Rob Kimberley
Sat, Nov 27, 2010 6:20 PM

Altitude is the least accurate parameter when doing this, as very rarely one
bird directly overhead. For best geometry you ideally want 3 birds 120
degrees apart and say 5 degrees above the horizon and one bird directly
above. Never that simple!

Rob Kimberley

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of William H. Fite
Sent: 27 November 2010 6:07 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt & Lady Heather 48 hour precision survey

Interesting.  I had my tbolt mask set at 10 degrees.  Raised it to 20 and
got the same position but a 60cm difference in altitude.

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Rob Kimberley
rk@timing-consultants.comwrote:

Careful setting the elevation mask that low. I wouldn't go below 5

degrees.

I know you want best geometry for best position determination, but
there are all sorts of effects down at those levels which will degrade
your results.

Rob Kimberley

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com]
On Behalf Of Robert Darlington
Sent: 26 November 2010 9:23 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt & Lady Heather 48 hour precision
survey

I'm running another test now and it's significantly improved after the
48 hour survey.  Before I'd see several degree swings over the course
of an hour, now it's more like 1.1 degrees in the last 8 hours.  The
problem here is I didn't do anything to the styrofoam box, but the
idea was to keep temperature swings swinging slowly.  For all I know I
might be fighting the Thunderbolt.

I'm running another test under the direction of Warren S. and will
post another screen shot late tonight after I collect about 24 hrs of
data with the elevation mask set to zero degrees.  I'm determined to
tune this thing to be better than it was out of the box!

-Bob

On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Dave hartzell hartzell@gmail.com
wrote:

On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Robert Darlington
<rdarlington@gmail.com

wrote:

I keep it in a styrofoam beer cooler surrounded with bottled water
in a draft free area and it's been all over the map.

Robert-

Are you doing this for temperature stability?  How stable is it?

Dave


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Altitude is the least accurate parameter when doing this, as very rarely one bird directly overhead. For best geometry you ideally want 3 birds 120 degrees apart and say 5 degrees above the horizon and one bird directly above. Never that simple! Rob Kimberley -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of William H. Fite Sent: 27 November 2010 6:07 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt & Lady Heather 48 hour precision survey Interesting. I had my tbolt mask set at 10 degrees. Raised it to 20 and got the same position but a 60cm difference in altitude. On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Rob Kimberley <rk@timing-consultants.com>wrote: > Careful setting the elevation mask that low. I wouldn't go below 5 degrees. > > I know you want best geometry for best position determination, but > there are all sorts of effects down at those levels which will degrade > your results. > > Rob Kimberley > > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] > On Behalf Of Robert Darlington > Sent: 26 November 2010 9:23 PM > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt & Lady Heather 48 hour precision > survey > > I'm running another test now and it's significantly improved after the > 48 hour survey. Before I'd see several degree swings over the course > of an hour, now it's more like 1.1 degrees in the last 8 hours. The > problem here is I didn't do anything to the styrofoam box, but the > idea was to keep temperature swings swinging slowly. For all I know I > might be fighting the Thunderbolt. > > I'm running another test under the direction of Warren S. and will > post another screen shot late tonight after I collect about 24 hrs of > data with the elevation mask set to zero degrees. I'm determined to > tune this thing to be better than it was out of the box! > > -Bob > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Dave hartzell <hartzell@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Robert Darlington > > <rdarlington@gmail.com > > >wrote: > > > > > I keep it in a styrofoam beer cooler surrounded with bottled water > > > in a draft free area and it's been all over the map. > > > > > > Robert- > > > > Are you doing this for temperature stability? How stable is it? > > > > > > Dave > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to > > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.