volt-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise voltage measurement

View all threads

Wanted wirewound precision resistors and ESI DB877

FS
Frank Stellmach
Tue, Jun 19, 2012 2:57 PM

It seem so because the direct resistance measurement seem ok,
and the current once connected to the fluke 343 source
returns perfect value, but now I fear to repeat the process.
...
Can you advice a tecnique to check the other resistors?

I think, you should better measure the resistance by a high resolution
DMM, on its normal OHM range.
Thats much more stable and less power is dissipated. A comparison
between two of them is also much easier.

I opened one broken resistor ( they are open, with only a tape
on the outside) and the wire is oily, there was also somethin like
wax in some points on the outside. I think you are right that the
wire insulation is probably compromised.

I have seen wax inside very old ww resistors from COHU and KINTEL, on
the soldering junction between resistance wire and leads.
Obviously to protect the solder from corrosion.
Some drops of oil may be used to increase high volt isolation as it
ingresses between the windings. I assume, your resistors are tubular
ones, with plastiv caps around, and they are not hermetically tight,
therefore they cant be filled completely for corrosion protection and
thermal  conductivity, like in the Vishay metal foil VHP type.

Besides electrical measurement (on OHM range!), I 'd recommen optical
inspection of the case, and if its possible, of the windings for
burnt/overheated areas. Corrosion may be easily identified, also by
slightly stained parts of the wire.

From your description, the resistors seem to be very old, from the
70ties perhaps, therefore the solder junctions may also be defect, if
you find an "open" resistor. Careful resoldering might help.

Frank

> It seem so because the direct resistance measurement seem ok, > and the current once connected to the fluke 343 source > returns perfect value, but now I fear to repeat the process. > ... > Can you advice a tecnique to check the other resistors? I think, you should better measure the resistance by a high resolution DMM, on its normal OHM range. Thats much more stable and less power is dissipated. A comparison between two of them is also much easier. > I opened one broken resistor ( they are open, with only a tape > on the outside) and the wire is oily, there was also somethin like > wax in some points on the outside. I think you are right that the > wire insulation is probably compromised. I have seen wax inside very old ww resistors from COHU and KINTEL, on the soldering junction between resistance wire and leads. Obviously to protect the solder from corrosion. Some drops of oil may be used to increase high volt isolation as it ingresses between the windings. I assume, your resistors are tubular ones, with plastiv caps around, and they are not hermetically tight, therefore they cant be filled completely for corrosion protection and thermal conductivity, like in the Vishay metal foil VHP type. Besides electrical measurement (on OHM range!), I 'd recommen optical inspection of the case, and if its possible, of the windings for burnt/overheated areas. Corrosion may be easily identified, also by slightly stained parts of the wire. From your description, the resistors seem to be very old, from the 70ties perhaps, therefore the solder junctions may also be defect, if you find an "open" resistor. Careful resoldering might help. Frank
CH
Chuck Harris
Tue, Jun 19, 2012 4:34 PM

Looks like wax, but more probably it is the carrier for
the flux used in soldering.  Back in the days of old, everyone
used a petroleum jelly based, zinc chloride flux for soldering
larger wires to terminals.

-Chuck Harris

Frank Stellmach wrote:
...

I have seen wax inside very old ww resistors from COHU and KINTEL, on the soldering
junction between resistance wire and leads.
Obviously to protect the solder from corrosion.
Some drops of oil may be used to increase high volt isolation as it ingresses between
the windings. I assume, your resistors are tubular ones, with plastiv caps around,
and they are not hermetically tight, therefore they cant be filled completely for
corrosion protection and thermal  conductivity, like in the Vishay metal foil VHP type.

Besides electrical measurement (on OHM range!), I 'd recommen optical inspection of
the case, and if its possible, of the windings for burnt/overheated areas. Corrosion
may be easily identified, also by slightly stained parts of the wire.

From your description, the resistors seem to be very old, from the 70ties perhaps,
therefore the solder junctions may also be defect, if you find an "open" resistor.
Careful resoldering might help.

Frank

Looks like wax, but more probably it is the carrier for the flux used in soldering. Back in the days of old, everyone used a petroleum jelly based, zinc chloride flux for soldering larger wires to terminals. -Chuck Harris Frank Stellmach wrote: ... > I have seen wax inside very old ww resistors from COHU and KINTEL, on the soldering > junction between resistance wire and leads. > Obviously to protect the solder from corrosion. > Some drops of oil may be used to increase high volt isolation as it ingresses between > the windings. I assume, your resistors are tubular ones, with plastiv caps around, > and they are not hermetically tight, therefore they cant be filled completely for > corrosion protection and thermal conductivity, like in the Vishay metal foil VHP type. > > Besides electrical measurement (on OHM range!), I 'd recommen optical inspection of > the case, and if its possible, of the windings for burnt/overheated areas. Corrosion > may be easily identified, also by slightly stained parts of the wire. > > From your description, the resistors seem to be very old, from the 70ties perhaps, > therefore the solder junctions may also be defect, if you find an "open" resistor. > Careful resoldering might help. > > Frank
FE
Fabio Eboli
Tue, Jun 19, 2012 6:04 PM

I think, you should better measure the resistance by a high
resolution DMM, on its normal OHM range.
Thats much more stable and less power is dissipated. A comparison
between two of them is also much easier.

Yes I'm using a pair of multimeters: the keithley 2015 and
a solartron 7061, the keithley should be not far from real
values, but has a maximum count of 1200000, the
solartron is "zeroed" against the keithley,
has a maximum count of 21000000, permitting to compare
the 1M and 2M resistors without changing range and resolution.

I used the fluke to try to test for leackage, I
tought that if there was some leackage, the current
would have been higher than V/R ratio and not
proportional to the voltage.

ingresses between the windings. I assume, your resistors are tubular
ones, with plastiv caps around, and they are not hermetically tight,
therefore they cant be filled completely for corrosion protection
and thermal  conductivity, like in the Vishay metal foil VHP type.

See the link, there is a pic of the resistor, it's open, no protection
at all.

Besides electrical measurement (on OHM range!), I 'd recommen
optical inspection of the case, and if its possible, of the windings
for burnt/overheated areas. Corrosion may be easily identified, also
by slightly stained parts of the wire.

yes, the low valued resistors (10/20 ohm) seem a little corroded.
The intermediate valued ones seem ok.

Is the wire used (manganin?) prone to corrosion?

Fabio.


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Here I put some photos of the decade: http://www.eevblog.com/forum/product-reviews-photos-and-discussion/db877-teardown/ Frank Stellmach <frank.stellmach@freenet.de> ha scritto: > I think, you should better measure the resistance by a high > resolution DMM, on its normal OHM range. > Thats much more stable and less power is dissipated. A comparison > between two of them is also much easier. Yes I'm using a pair of multimeters: the keithley 2015 and a solartron 7061, the keithley should be not far from real values, but has a maximum count of 1200000, the solartron is "zeroed" against the keithley, has a maximum count of 21000000, permitting to compare the 1M and 2M resistors without changing range and resolution. I used the fluke to try to test for leackage, I tought that if there was some leackage, the current would have been higher than V/R ratio and not proportional to the voltage. > ingresses between the windings. I assume, your resistors are tubular > ones, with plastiv caps around, and they are not hermetically tight, > therefore they cant be filled completely for corrosion protection > and thermal conductivity, like in the Vishay metal foil VHP type. See the link, there is a pic of the resistor, it's open, no protection at all. > > Besides electrical measurement (on OHM range!), I 'd recommen > optical inspection of the case, and if its possible, of the windings > for burnt/overheated areas. Corrosion may be easily identified, also > by slightly stained parts of the wire. yes, the low valued resistors (10/20 ohm) seem a little corroded. The intermediate valued ones seem ok. Is the wire used (manganin?) prone to corrosion? Fabio. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
MK
m k
Tue, Jun 19, 2012 6:54 PM

I accidentally replied just to artechmedia with this reply:
I have seen reports of people having problems reproducing the very low TC's that Vishay has been reporting for their z foil resistors. It seems that the low TC may only be for one particular resistance value in the range?  So although they will be stable and usable, do not take the TC for granted...MK

Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:04:40 +0200
From: FabioEb@quipo.it
To: volt-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] Wanted wirewound precision resistors and ESI DB877

Here I put some photos of the decade:
http://www.eevblog.com/forum/product-reviews-photos-and-discussion/db877-teardown/

Frank Stellmach frank.stellmach@freenet.de ha scritto:

I think, you should better measure the resistance by a high
resolution DMM, on its normal OHM range.
Thats much more stable and less power is dissipated. A comparison
between two of them is also much easier.

Yes I'm using a pair of multimeters: the keithley 2015 and
a solartron 7061, the keithley should be not far from real
values, but has a maximum count of 1200000, the
solartron is "zeroed" against the keithley,
has a maximum count of 21000000, permitting to compare
the 1M and 2M resistors without changing range and resolution.

I used the fluke to try to test for leackage, I
tought that if there was some leackage, the current
would have been higher than V/R ratio and not
proportional to the voltage.

ingresses between the windings. I assume, your resistors are tubular
ones, with plastiv caps around, and they are not hermetically tight,
therefore they cant be filled completely for corrosion protection
and thermal  conductivity, like in the Vishay metal foil VHP type.

See the link, there is a pic of the resistor, it's open, no protection
at all.

Besides electrical measurement (on OHM range!), I 'd recommen
optical inspection of the case, and if its possible, of the windings
for burnt/overheated areas. Corrosion may be easily identified, also
by slightly stained parts of the wire.

yes, the low valued resistors (10/20 ohm) seem a little corroded.
The intermediate valued ones seem ok.

Is the wire used (manganin?) prone to corrosion?

Fabio.


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.


volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

I accidentally replied just to artechmedia with this reply: I have seen reports of people having problems reproducing the very low TC's that Vishay has been reporting for their z foil resistors. It seems that the low TC may only be for one particular resistance value in the range? So although they will be stable and usable, do not take the TC for granted...MK > Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:04:40 +0200 > From: FabioEb@quipo.it > To: volt-nuts@febo.com > Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] Wanted wirewound precision resistors and ESI DB877 > > Here I put some photos of the decade: > http://www.eevblog.com/forum/product-reviews-photos-and-discussion/db877-teardown/ > > Frank Stellmach <frank.stellmach@freenet.de> ha scritto: > > I think, you should better measure the resistance by a high > > resolution DMM, on its normal OHM range. > > Thats much more stable and less power is dissipated. A comparison > > between two of them is also much easier. > > Yes I'm using a pair of multimeters: the keithley 2015 and > a solartron 7061, the keithley should be not far from real > values, but has a maximum count of 1200000, the > solartron is "zeroed" against the keithley, > has a maximum count of 21000000, permitting to compare > the 1M and 2M resistors without changing range and resolution. > > I used the fluke to try to test for leackage, I > tought that if there was some leackage, the current > would have been higher than V/R ratio and not > proportional to the voltage. > > > ingresses between the windings. I assume, your resistors are tubular > > ones, with plastiv caps around, and they are not hermetically tight, > > therefore they cant be filled completely for corrosion protection > > and thermal conductivity, like in the Vishay metal foil VHP type. > > See the link, there is a pic of the resistor, it's open, no protection > at all. > > > > > Besides electrical measurement (on OHM range!), I 'd recommen > > optical inspection of the case, and if its possible, of the windings > > for burnt/overheated areas. Corrosion may be easily identified, also > > by slightly stained parts of the wire. > > yes, the low valued resistors (10/20 ohm) seem a little corroded. > The intermediate valued ones seem ok. > > Is the wire used (manganin?) prone to corrosion? > > Fabio. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > > > _______________________________________________ > volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
MK
m k
Tue, Jun 19, 2012 7:01 PM

Hi Fabio,
I remembered some problems soldering manganin a while ago, so I googled and this one came up:http://listserv.ipc.org/scripts/wa.exe?A2=technet;a5280f30.1203
So it is possible not all the previous flux was removed. I thought it was fairly stable, hence a good bet for standard resistors, but if overheated like you suspect then all bets would be off as they say.
MK

Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:04:40 +0200
From: FabioEb@quipo.it
To: volt-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] Wanted wirewound precision resistors and ESI DB877

Here I put some photos of the decade:
http://www.eevblog.com/forum/product-reviews-photos-and-discussion/db877-teardown/

Frank Stellmach frank.stellmach@freenet.de ha scritto:

I think, you should better measure the resistance by a high
resolution DMM, on its normal OHM range.
Thats much more stable and less power is dissipated. A comparison
between two of them is also much easier.

Yes I'm using a pair of multimeters: the keithley 2015 and
a solartron 7061, the keithley should be not far from real
values, but has a maximum count of 1200000, the
solartron is "zeroed" against the keithley,
has a maximum count of 21000000, permitting to compare
the 1M and 2M resistors without changing range and resolution.

I used the fluke to try to test for leackage, I
tought that if there was some leackage, the current
would have been higher than V/R ratio and not
proportional to the voltage.

ingresses between the windings. I assume, your resistors are tubular
ones, with plastiv caps around, and they are not hermetically tight,
therefore they cant be filled completely for corrosion protection
and thermal  conductivity, like in the Vishay metal foil VHP type.

See the link, there is a pic of the resistor, it's open, no protection
at all.

Besides electrical measurement (on OHM range!), I 'd recommen
optical inspection of the case, and if its possible, of the windings
for burnt/overheated areas. Corrosion may be easily identified, also
by slightly stained parts of the wire.

yes, the low valued resistors (10/20 ohm) seem a little corroded.
The intermediate valued ones seem ok.

Is the wire used (manganin?) prone to corrosion?

Fabio.


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.


volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Fabio, I remembered some problems soldering manganin a while ago, so I googled and this one came up:http://listserv.ipc.org/scripts/wa.exe?A2=technet;a5280f30.1203 So it is possible not all the previous flux was removed. I thought it was fairly stable, hence a good bet for standard resistors, but if overheated like you suspect then all bets would be off as they say. MK > Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:04:40 +0200 > From: FabioEb@quipo.it > To: volt-nuts@febo.com > Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] Wanted wirewound precision resistors and ESI DB877 > > Here I put some photos of the decade: > http://www.eevblog.com/forum/product-reviews-photos-and-discussion/db877-teardown/ > > Frank Stellmach <frank.stellmach@freenet.de> ha scritto: > > I think, you should better measure the resistance by a high > > resolution DMM, on its normal OHM range. > > Thats much more stable and less power is dissipated. A comparison > > between two of them is also much easier. > > Yes I'm using a pair of multimeters: the keithley 2015 and > a solartron 7061, the keithley should be not far from real > values, but has a maximum count of 1200000, the > solartron is "zeroed" against the keithley, > has a maximum count of 21000000, permitting to compare > the 1M and 2M resistors without changing range and resolution. > > I used the fluke to try to test for leackage, I > tought that if there was some leackage, the current > would have been higher than V/R ratio and not > proportional to the voltage. > > > ingresses between the windings. I assume, your resistors are tubular > > ones, with plastiv caps around, and they are not hermetically tight, > > therefore they cant be filled completely for corrosion protection > > and thermal conductivity, like in the Vishay metal foil VHP type. > > See the link, there is a pic of the resistor, it's open, no protection > at all. > > > > > Besides electrical measurement (on OHM range!), I 'd recommen > > optical inspection of the case, and if its possible, of the windings > > for burnt/overheated areas. Corrosion may be easily identified, also > > by slightly stained parts of the wire. > > yes, the low valued resistors (10/20 ohm) seem a little corroded. > The intermediate valued ones seem ok. > > Is the wire used (manganin?) prone to corrosion? > > Fabio. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > > > _______________________________________________ > volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
RA
Robert Atkinson
Tue, Jun 19, 2012 7:12 PM

Hi Fabio,
the DB877 is a nice box and is still available from IET Labs. See http://www.ietlabs.com/sitesearch?q=db877 The manual is here http://www.ietlabs.com/sitesearch?q=db877

They will sell you parts but they are not cheap. You won't find a compact 8 decade box with it's accuracy very easily. Even with standard 0.1% resistors subsituted it's a nice unit.

Robert G8RPI


From: Fabio Eboli FabioEb@quipo.it
To: Discussion of precise voltage measurement volt-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Tuesday, 19 June 2012, 19:04
Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] Wanted wirewound precision resistors and ESI DB877

Here I put some photos of the decade:
http://www.eevblog.com/forum/product-reviews-photos-and-discussion/db877-teardown/

Frank Stellmach frank.stellmach@freenet.de ha scritto:

I think, you should better measure the resistance by a high resolution DMM, on its normal OHM range.
Thats much more stable and less power is dissipated. A comparison between two of them is also much easier.

Yes I'm using a pair of multimeters: the keithley 2015 and
a solartron 7061, the keithley should be not far from real
values, but has a maximum count of 1200000, the
solartron is "zeroed" against the keithley,
has a maximum count of 21000000, permitting to compare
the 1M and 2M resistors without changing range and resolution.

I used the fluke to try to test for leackage, I
tought that if there was some leackage, the current
would have been higher than V/R ratio and not
proportional to the voltage.

ingresses between the windings. I assume, your resistors are tubular ones, with plastiv caps around, and they are not hermetically tight, therefore they cant be filled completely for corrosion protection and thermal  conductivity, like in the Vishay metal foil VHP type.

See the link, there is a pic of the resistor, it's open, no protection
at all.

Besides electrical measurement (on OHM range!), I 'd recommen optical inspection of the case, and if its possible, of the windings for burnt/overheated areas. Corrosion may be easily identified, also by slightly stained parts of the wire.

yes, the low valued resistors (10/20 ohm) seem a little corroded.
The intermediate valued ones seem ok.

Is the wire used (manganin?) prone to corrosion?

Fabio.


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.


volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Fabio, the DB877 is a nice box and is still available from IET Labs. See http://www.ietlabs.com/sitesearch?q=db877 The manual is here http://www.ietlabs.com/sitesearch?q=db877 They will sell you parts but they are not cheap. You won't find a compact 8 decade box with it's accuracy very easily. Even with standard 0.1% resistors subsituted it's a nice unit. Robert G8RPI ________________________________ From: Fabio Eboli <FabioEb@quipo.it> To: Discussion of precise voltage measurement <volt-nuts@febo.com> Sent: Tuesday, 19 June 2012, 19:04 Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] Wanted wirewound precision resistors and ESI DB877 Here I put some photos of the decade: http://www.eevblog.com/forum/product-reviews-photos-and-discussion/db877-teardown/ Frank Stellmach <frank.stellmach@freenet.de> ha scritto: > I think, you should better measure the resistance by a high resolution DMM, on its normal OHM range. > Thats much more stable and less power is dissipated. A comparison between two of them is also much easier. Yes I'm using a pair of multimeters: the keithley 2015 and a solartron 7061, the keithley should be not far from real values, but has a maximum count of 1200000, the solartron is "zeroed" against the keithley, has a maximum count of 21000000, permitting to compare the 1M and 2M resistors without changing range and resolution. I used the fluke to try to test for leackage, I tought that if there was some leackage, the current would have been higher than V/R ratio and not proportional to the voltage. > ingresses between the windings. I assume, your resistors are tubular ones, with plastiv caps around, and they are not hermetically tight, therefore they cant be filled completely for corrosion protection and thermal  conductivity, like in the Vishay metal foil VHP type. See the link, there is a pic of the resistor, it's open, no protection at all. > > Besides electrical measurement (on OHM range!), I 'd recommen optical inspection of the case, and if its possible, of the windings for burnt/overheated areas. Corrosion may be easily identified, also by slightly stained parts of the wire. yes, the low valued resistors (10/20 ohm) seem a little corroded. The intermediate valued ones seem ok. Is the wire used (manganin?) prone to corrosion? Fabio. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. _______________________________________________ volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts and follow the instructions there.
FE
Fabio Eboli
Tue, Jun 19, 2012 7:35 PM

Hello, as for joining manganin I choose the fast dirty method:
http://tinyurl.com/dxvwy8p

In the 20kohm resistor, I tried to reconnect the broken wire,
I unwound a pair of turns and twisted the two wires together
under the scope. Then I simply brazed them using a little piece
of brazing wire (a speck flattened with hammer)  with a little
borax, more a plumbing work than an electronic one :)

Probably the thermal stress and the contamination isnt good for
a precision resistor, I will replace it anyway, but I will
keep the brazed one just to check it periodically.

Naturally this method involves heating the parts at 500-600°C :)

Fabio.

m k m1k3k1@hotmail.com ha scritto:

Hi Fabio,
I remembered some problems soldering manganin a while ago, so I
googled and this one came
up:http://listserv.ipc.org/scripts/wa.exe?A2=technet;a5280f30.1203
So it is possible not all the previous flux was removed. I thought
it was fairly stable, hence a good bet for standard resistors, but
if overheated like you suspect then all bets would be off as they say.
MK

Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:04:40 +0200
From: FabioEb@quipo.it
To: volt-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] Wanted wirewound precision resistors and ESI DB877

Here I put some photos of the decade:
http://www.eevblog.com/forum/product-reviews-photos-and-discussion/db877-teardown/

Frank Stellmach frank.stellmach@freenet.de ha scritto:

I think, you should better measure the resistance by a high
resolution DMM, on its normal OHM range.
Thats much more stable and less power is dissipated. A comparison
between two of them is also much easier.

Yes I'm using a pair of multimeters: the keithley 2015 and
a solartron 7061, the keithley should be not far from real
values, but has a maximum count of 1200000, the
solartron is "zeroed" against the keithley,
has a maximum count of 21000000, permitting to compare
the 1M and 2M resistors without changing range and resolution.

I used the fluke to try to test for leackage, I
tought that if there was some leackage, the current
would have been higher than V/R ratio and not
proportional to the voltage.

ingresses between the windings. I assume, your resistors are tubular
ones, with plastiv caps around, and they are not hermetically tight,
therefore they cant be filled completely for corrosion protection
and thermal  conductivity, like in the Vishay metal foil VHP type.

See the link, there is a pic of the resistor, it's open, no protection
at all.

Besides electrical measurement (on OHM range!), I 'd recommen
optical inspection of the case, and if its possible, of the windings
for burnt/overheated areas. Corrosion may be easily identified, also
by slightly stained parts of the wire.

yes, the low valued resistors (10/20 ohm) seem a little corroded.
The intermediate valued ones seem ok.

Is the wire used (manganin?) prone to corrosion?

Fabio.


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.


volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Hello, as for joining manganin I choose the fast dirty method: http://tinyurl.com/dxvwy8p In the 20kohm resistor, I tried to reconnect the broken wire, I unwound a pair of turns and twisted the two wires together under the scope. Then I simply brazed them using a little piece of brazing wire (a speck flattened with hammer) with a little borax, more a plumbing work than an electronic one :) Probably the thermal stress and the contamination isnt good for a precision resistor, I will replace it anyway, but I will keep the brazed one just to check it periodically. Naturally this method involves heating the parts at 500-600°C :) Fabio. m k <m1k3k1@hotmail.com> ha scritto: > > Hi Fabio, > I remembered some problems soldering manganin a while ago, so I > googled and this one came > up:http://listserv.ipc.org/scripts/wa.exe?A2=technet;a5280f30.1203 > So it is possible not all the previous flux was removed. I thought > it was fairly stable, hence a good bet for standard resistors, but > if overheated like you suspect then all bets would be off as they say. > MK > >> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:04:40 +0200 >> From: FabioEb@quipo.it >> To: volt-nuts@febo.com >> Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] Wanted wirewound precision resistors and ESI DB877 >> >> Here I put some photos of the decade: >> http://www.eevblog.com/forum/product-reviews-photos-and-discussion/db877-teardown/ >> >> Frank Stellmach <frank.stellmach@freenet.de> ha scritto: >> > I think, you should better measure the resistance by a high >> > resolution DMM, on its normal OHM range. >> > Thats much more stable and less power is dissipated. A comparison >> > between two of them is also much easier. >> >> Yes I'm using a pair of multimeters: the keithley 2015 and >> a solartron 7061, the keithley should be not far from real >> values, but has a maximum count of 1200000, the >> solartron is "zeroed" against the keithley, >> has a maximum count of 21000000, permitting to compare >> the 1M and 2M resistors without changing range and resolution. >> >> I used the fluke to try to test for leackage, I >> tought that if there was some leackage, the current >> would have been higher than V/R ratio and not >> proportional to the voltage. >> >> > ingresses between the windings. I assume, your resistors are tubular >> > ones, with plastiv caps around, and they are not hermetically tight, >> > therefore they cant be filled completely for corrosion protection >> > and thermal conductivity, like in the Vishay metal foil VHP type. >> >> See the link, there is a pic of the resistor, it's open, no protection >> at all. >> >> > >> > Besides electrical measurement (on OHM range!), I 'd recommen >> > optical inspection of the case, and if its possible, of the windings >> > for burnt/overheated areas. Corrosion may be easily identified, also >> > by slightly stained parts of the wire. >> >> yes, the low valued resistors (10/20 ohm) seem a little corroded. >> The intermediate valued ones seem ok. >> >> Is the wire used (manganin?) prone to corrosion? >> >> Fabio. >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.