Estimate for shrink wrap is $1200 due to: In water Awl gripped so plastic can't touch hull 51' overall 22' above waterline I have had good experience with the company for other maintenance work and trust him. Joe at Blitz. Any thoughts appreciated.

The estimate from a respected shop is $24k!!!. that represents about 50% of the value of the boat. That would include engine removal and two new aluminum tanks. I have confidence that the repair would be very good but naturally, I am looking for other options. If the boat were near my home I would do it myself but that is not an option.

Estimate the current is 3 to 4 knots. > Can this do any damage? > (Not another thing to do when anchoring!)

Unfortunately it's impossible to give an estimate as to how much more performance we can squeeze out of the device. That said, you ought to be able to get around 4Msps (decim=16) out of the E100, if you aren't doing much with the samples.

Since you're performing end-to-end testing, I'm guessing that access to physical layer status - mainly the PDSCH constellation and channel equalizer estimate - is not straightforward. That would be immensely helpful though as narrowband interference or distortion will show up clearly in the latter.

They were trying to estimate rock density. They measured gravity and corrected for elevation. We asked him how they got the elevation that accurately? He smiled and said from the sewer people. -- The suespammers.org mail server is located in California. So are all my other mailboxes.

In message <000001c6e54b$d13299a0$03b2fea9@athlon>, "Ulrich Bangert" writes: >Hello Paul-Henning, > >www.tmo.jpl.nasa.gov/progress_report/42-121/121G.pdf > >definitely uses no FFT but uses a theoreme from geometry to estimate the >signal's frequency and the rest is a two dimensional non-linear fit for >amplitude and phase.

The phase noise figures quoted re only useful for estimating ADEV etc for (tau < 0.1 sec) when this is largely determined by the OCXO itself. Bruce

Now you've explained it, yes it is :-) > You can get a good estimate of the 1-way delay by polling a typical remote > box and dividing the response time by two. (Correct for packet lengths if > that matters.) I could even integrate that into the system - at least for the 2-way nodes. > Check the numbers. or try it.

In the 5052B you have a PLL with non-zero bandwidth, so below some offset you probably get an optimistic estimate because the PLL is actually following the noise.