What is the feasibility of setting up a single repository running the new Nuxeo CAP 5.5 (DM + DAM specifically) and CollectionSpace 2.0 in a single repository? I would like to be able to relate documents to works in our collection. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Charlie

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Hi Charlie -

This is something we would really like to investigate, as many folks have
expressed at least some interest in this. We have also been assured by the
Nuxeo folks that this should be possible. At this point, it is mostly a
matter of resources and priorities. If the community rallies support for
this as an essential integration, we should be able to find time in the
Phase 3 project to investigate it.

Note that we are otherwise interested in getting the DM working as a
diagnostic and support tool, and to aid with import/export workflows. As
such, there may be some basic investigation (not necessarily including
DAM/CSpace coordination) in the near term.

I doubt very much that CSpace will appear as a tab in the Nuxeo UI any time
soon, as this is not a use-case that anyone (else) has yet requested. Am not
ruling it out, just giving my impression of the current project priorities,
in response to your question on a related thread.

Thanks for the question -

Patrick

From: talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org
[mailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Moad
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 6:18 AM
To: talk@lists.collectionspace.org
Subject: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

What is the feasibility of setting up a single repository running the new
Nuxeo CAP 5.5 (DM + DAM specifically) and CollectionSpace 2.0 in a single
repository? I would like to be able to relate documents to works in our
collection. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Charlie

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies
of the original message.

Thanks for following up Patrick. I'll rally my friends. I wouldn't expect a CollectionSpace tab in Nuxeo CAP anytime soon either, but it would be pretty powerful to have a single repository for the sole purpose of relating documents to collection objects, exhibitions, etc.

Keep up the good work,
Charlie

From: Patrick Schmitz <pschmitz@berkeley.edumailto:pschmitz@berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 10:33:48 -0800
To: Charles Moad <cmoad@imamuseum.orgmailto:cmoad@imamuseum.org>, <talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk@lists.collectionspace.org>
Subject: RE: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

Hi Charlie -

This is something we would really like to investigate, as many folks have expressed at least some interest in this. We have also been assured by the Nuxeo folks that this should be possible. At this point, it is mostly a matter of resources and priorities. If the community rallies support for this as an essential integration, we should be able to find time in the Phase 3 project to investigate it.

Note that we are otherwise interested in getting the DM working as a diagnostic and support tool, and to aid with import/export workflows. As such, there may be some basic investigation (not necessarily including DAM/CSpace coordination) in the near term.

I doubt very much that CSpace will appear as a tab in the Nuxeo UI any time soon, as this is not a use-case that anyone (else) has yet requested. Am not ruling it out, just giving my impression of the current project priorities, in response to your question on a related thread.

Thanks for the question -

Patrick

From: talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org [mailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Moad
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 6:18 AM
To: talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk@lists.collectionspace.org
Subject: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

What is the feasibility of setting up a single repository running the new Nuxeo CAP 5.5 (DM + DAM specifically) and CollectionSpace 2.0 in a single repository? I would like to be able to relate documents to works in our collection. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Charlie

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

At the IMA we are just in the process of rolling out the new DAM software based on 5.5. We have been using DM with a select group of staff members for several months now with decent success. We found the previous versions of DAM lacking some very basic needs and many of those have been addressed in the latest release. We even paid for the development of some of those enhancements. In general Nuxeo DAM is fairly simple, but that's all that we (and I suspect many museums) need. We need it to be able to handle and preview media files and relate them to our institution. I'm not entirely sure what the effort would be and if much additional work would be required. That's why I reached out. I'll continue to investigate this and come back with progress I might have.

• Charlie

From: Chris Hoffman <chris.hoffman@berkeley.edumailto:chris.hoffman@berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:39:36 -0800
To: Charles Moad <cmoad@imamuseum.orgmailto:cmoad@imamuseum.org>
Cc: "talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk@lists.collectionspace.org" <talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk@lists.collectionspace.org>
Subject: Re: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

Hi Charlie,

At UC Berkeley, we have a very strong need to connect collections management and digital asset management functions in the way you describe.  The Nuxeo DAM has seemed like a good way to go, but we haven't really experimented with it here.  What's your experience been like?  Anyway, we'll happily endorse this too.  And if it's something that looks like it needs another grant-funded project to do right, maybe we could get our institutions to partner on something.  Just thinking out loud...

Thanks,
Chris

On Jan 4, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Charlie Moad wrote:

Thanks for following up Patrick. I'll rally my friends. I wouldn't expect a CollectionSpace tab in Nuxeo CAP anytime soon either, but it would be pretty powerful to have a single repository for the sole purpose of relating documents to collection objects, exhibitions, etc.

Keep up the good work,
Charlie

From: Patrick Schmitz <pschmitz@berkeley.edumailto:pschmitz@berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 10:33:48 -0800
To: Charles Moad <cmoad@imamuseum.orgmailto:cmoad@imamuseum.org>, <talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk@lists.collectionspace.org>
Subject: RE: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

Hi Charlie -

This is something we would really like to investigate, as many folks have expressed at least some interest in this. We have also been assured by the Nuxeo folks that this should be possible. At this point, it is mostly a matter of resources and priorities. If the community rallies support for this as an essential integration, we should be able to find time in the Phase 3 project to investigate it.

Note that we are otherwise interested in getting the DM working as a diagnostic and support tool, and to aid with import/export workflows. As such, there may be some basic investigation (not necessarily including DAM/CSpace coordination) in the near term.

I doubt very much that CSpace will appear as a tab in the Nuxeo UI any time soon, as this is not a use-case that anyone (else) has yet requested. Am not ruling it out, just giving my impression of the current project priorities, in response to your question on a related thread.

Thanks for the question -

Patrick

From: talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org [mailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Moad
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 6:18 AM
To: talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk@lists.collectionspace.org
Subject: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

What is the feasibility of setting up a single repository running the new Nuxeo CAP 5.5 (DM + DAM specifically) and CollectionSpace 2.0 in a single repository? I would like to be able to relate documents to works in our collection. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Charlie

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Talk mailing list
Talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:Talk@lists.collectionspace.org
http://lists.collectionspace.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_lists.collectionspace.org

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Hi Charlie,

Here at SMK we're also in the process of defining our requirements for a DAM solution and as a part of this process have also tested an earlier Nuxeo DAM version. It was basic, but seemed fast and stable in the short period we tested it. Relating texts and documents to artworks is also a pressing use case for us - although I hope we can integrate this into CollectionSpace either through the Media Handling procedure by supporting some new document types (pdf, doc, html etc.) or possibly even by creating a new procedure for handling related texts. In any case I look forward to following your investigations.

Regards,

(another) Chris

Fra: talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org [mailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org] På vegne af Charlie Moad
Sendt: 4. januar 2012 22:48
Til: Chris Hoffman
Cc: talk@lists.collectionspace.org
Emne: Re: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

At the IMA we are just in the process of rolling out the new DAM software based on 5.5. We have been using DM with a select group of staff members for several months now with decent success. We found the previous versions of DAM lacking some very basic needs and many of those have been addressed in the latest release. We even paid for the development of some of those enhancements. In general Nuxeo DAM is fairly simple, but that's all that we (and I suspect many museums) need. We need it to be able to handle and preview media files and relate them to our institution. I'm not entirely sure what the effort would be and if much additional work would be required. That's why I reached out. I'll continue to investigate this and come back with progress I might have.

• Charlie

From: Chris Hoffman chris.hoffman@berkeley.edu
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:39:36 -0800
To: Charles Moad cmoad@imamuseum.org
Cc: "talk@lists.collectionspace.org" talk@lists.collectionspace.org
Subject: Re: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

Hi Charlie,

At UC Berkeley, we have a very strong need to connect collections management and digital asset management functions in the way you describe.  The Nuxeo DAM has seemed like a good way to go, but we haven't really experimented with it here.  What's your experience been like?  Anyway, we'll happily endorse this too.  And if it's something that looks like it needs another grant-funded project to do right, maybe we could get our institutions to partner on something.  Just thinking out loud...

Thanks,

Chris

On Jan 4, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Charlie Moad wrote:

Thanks for following up Patrick. I'll rally my friends. I wouldn't expect a CollectionSpace tab in Nuxeo CAP anytime soon either, but it would be pretty powerful to have a single repository for the sole purpose of relating documents to collection objects, exhibitions, etc.

Keep up the good work,

Charlie

From: Patrick Schmitz pschmitz@berkeley.edu
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 10:33:48 -0800
To: Charles Moad cmoad@imamuseum.org, talk@lists.collectionspace.org
Subject: RE: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

Hi Charlie -

This is something we would really like to investigate, as many folks have expressed at least some interest in this. We have also been assured by the Nuxeo folks that this should be possible. At this point, it is mostly a matter of resources and priorities. If the community rallies support for this as an essential integration, we should be able to find time in the Phase 3 project to investigate it.

Note that we are otherwise interested in getting the DM working as a diagnostic and support tool, and to aid with import/export workflows. As such, there may be some basic investigation (not necessarily including DAM/CSpace coordination) in the near term.

I doubt very much that CSpace will appear as a tab in the Nuxeo UI any time soon, as this is not a use-case that anyone (else) has yet requested. Am not ruling it out, just giving my impression of the current project priorities, in response to your question on a related thread.

Thanks for the question -

Patrick

From: talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org [mailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Moad
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 6:18 AM
To: talk@lists.collectionspace.org
Subject: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

What is the feasibility of setting up a single repository running the new Nuxeo CAP 5.5 (DM + DAM specifically) and CollectionSpace 2.0 in a single repository? I would like to be able to relate documents to works in our collection. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Charlie

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Talk mailing list
Talk@lists.collectionspace.org
http://lists.collectionspace.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_lists.collectionspace.org

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

I haven't had much time, but I took a naïve attempt at installing CS+DM+DAM all on the same postgres database. I am attaching two screenshots of the results. There are only a few errors during the DM+DAM startup, but things seem to run well enough. There appears to be promise. Two glaring things are that the "default-domain" that is normally part of the top-level of DM is missing. Looking inside each CS domain shows a workspace for each type, but they are empty. I would hope that it is only a matter of adding the proper Nuxeo extensions to expose these types to the DM interface. Any insight the development team has would be interesting. In the mean time I believe we are going to relate our DM documents to placeholders documents. The prospect of creating relationship between DM documents and CS ones feels close though.

• Charlie

From: Christopher Pott <Christopher.Pott@smk.dkmailto:Christopher.Pott@smk.dk>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:35:34 +0100
To: Charles Moad <cmoad@imamuseum.orgmailto:cmoad@imamuseum.org>, Chris Hoffman <chris.hoffman@berkeley.edumailto:chris.hoffman@berkeley.edu>
Cc: <talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk@lists.collectionspace.org>
Subject: SV: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

Hi Charlie,

Here at SMK we’re also in the process of defining our requirements for a DAM solution and as a part of this process have also tested an earlier Nuxeo DAM version. It was basic, but seemed fast and stable in the short period we tested it. Relating texts and documents to artworks is also a pressing use case for us – although Ihope we can integrate this into CollectionSpace either through the Media Handling procedure by supporting some new document types (pdf, doc, html etc.) or possibly even by creating a new procedure for handling related texts. In any case I look forward to following your investigations.

Regards,
(another) Chris

Fra: talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org [mailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org] På vegne af Charlie Moad
Sendt: 4. januar 2012 22:48
Til: Chris Hoffman
Cc: talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk@lists.collectionspace.org
Emne: Re: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

At the IMA we are just in the process of rolling out the new DAM software based on 5.5. We have been using DM with a select group of staff members for several months now with decent success. We found the previous versions of DAM lacking some very basic needs and many of those have been addressed in the latest release. We even paid for the development of some of those enhancements. In general Nuxeo DAM is fairly simple, but that's all that we (and I suspect many museums) need. We need it to be able to handle and preview media files and relate them to our institution. I'm not entirely sure what the effort would be and if much additional work would be required. That's why I reached out. I'll continue to investigate this and come back with progress I might have.

• Charlie

From: Chris Hoffman <chris.hoffman@berkeley.edumailto:chris.hoffman@berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:39:36 -0800
To: Charles Moad <cmoad@imamuseum.orgmailto:cmoad@imamuseum.org>
Cc: "talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk@lists.collectionspace.org" <talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk@lists.collectionspace.org>
Subject: Re: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

Hi Charlie,

At UC Berkeley, we have a very strong need to connect collections management and digital assetmanagement functions in the way you describe.  The Nuxeo DAM has seemed like a good way to go, but we haven't really experimented with it here.  What's your experience been like?  Anyway, we'll happily endorsethis too.  And if it's something that looks like it needs another grant-funded project to do right, maybe we could get our institutions to partner on something.  Just thinking out loud...

Thanks,
Chris

On Jan 4, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Charlie Moad wrote:

Thanks for following up Patrick. I'll rally my friends. I wouldn't expect a CollectionSpace tab in Nuxeo CAP anytime soon either, but it would be pretty powerful to have a single repository for the sole purpose of relating documents to collection objects, exhibitions, etc.

Keep up the good work,
Charlie

From: Patrick Schmitz <pschmitz@berkeley.edumailto:pschmitz@berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 10:33:48 -0800
To: Charles Moad <cmoad@imamuseum.orgmailto:cmoad@imamuseum.org>, <talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk@lists.collectionspace.org>
Subject: RE: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

Hi Charlie -

This is something we would really like to investigate, as many folks have expressed at least some interest in this. We have also been assured by the Nuxeo folks that this should be possible. At this point, it is mostly a matter of resources and priorities. If the community rallies support for this as an essential integration, we should be able to find time in the Phase 3 project to investigate it.

Note that we are otherwise interested in getting the DM working as a diagnostic and support tool, and to aid with import/export workflows. As such, there may be some basic investigation (not necessarily including DAM/CSpace coordination) in the near term.

I doubt very much that CSpace will appear as a tab in the Nuxeo UI any time soon, as this is not ause-case that anyone (else) has yet requested. Am not ruling it out, just giving my impression of the current project priorities, in response to yourquestion on a related thread.

Thanks for the question -

Patrick

From: talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org [mailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Moad
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 6:18 AM
To: talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk@lists.collectionspace.org
Subject: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS
What is the feasibility of setting up a single repository running the new Nuxeo CAP 5.5 (DM + DAM specifically) and CollectionSpace 2.0 in a single repository? I would like to be able to relate documents to works in our collection. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Charlie

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Talk mailing list
Talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:Talk@lists.collectionspace.org
http://lists.collectionspace.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_lists.collectionspace.org

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Charlie,

Thanks for experimenting with this.  One of our known tasks is to ensure
that CollectionSpace can co-exist with Nuxeo’s DM and DAM applications.
Unfortunately, this work is not currently scheduled to happen anytime soon.
However, we understand the value of CollectionSpace being able to co-exist
with Nuxeo’s applications.  If you feel we need to make this work a higher
priority, please review the current release roadmaps and see how this work
compares to what we have planned.  If you decide this work is more
important, let us know and we can try to raise its priority.

-Richard

From: talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org
[mailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Moad
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 7:14 PM
To: Christopher Pott; Chris Hoffman
Cc: talk@lists.collectionspace.org
Subject: Re: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

I haven't had much time, but I took a naïve attempt at installing CS+DM+DAM
all on the same postgres database. I am attaching two screenshots of the
results. There are only a few errors during the DM+DAM startup, but things
seem to run well enough. There appears to be promise. Two glaring things are
that the "default-domain" that is normally part of the top-level of DM is
missing. Looking inside each CS domain shows a workspace for each type, but
they are empty. I would hope that it is only a matter of adding the proper
Nuxeo extensions to expose these types to the DM interface. Any insight the
development team has would be interesting. In the mean time I believe we are
going to relate our DM documents to placeholders documents. The prospect of
creating relationship between DM documents and CS ones feels close though.

• Charlie

From: Christopher Pott Christopher.Pott@smk.dk
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:35:34 +0100
To: Charles Moad cmoad@imamuseum.org, Chris Hoffman
chris.hoffman@berkeley.edu
Cc: talk@lists.collectionspace.org
Subject: SV: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

Hi Charlie,

Here at SMK we’re also in the process of defining our requirements for a DAM
solution and as a part of this process have also tested an earlier Nuxeo DAM
version. It was basic, but seemed fast and stable in the short period we
tested it. Relating texts and documents to artworks is also a pressing use
case for us – although Ihope we can integrate this into CollectionSpace
either through the Media Handling procedure by supporting some new document
types (pdf, doc, html etc.) or possibly even by creating a new procedure for
handling related texts. In any case I look forward to following your
investigations.

Regards,

(another) Chris

Fra: talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org
[mailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org] På vegne af Charlie Moad
Sendt: 4. januar 2012 22:48
Til: Chris Hoffman
Cc: talk@lists.collectionspace.org
Emne: Re: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

At the IMA we are just in the process of rolling out the new DAM software
based on 5.5. We have been using DM with a select group of staff members for
several months now with decent success. We found the previous versions of
DAM lacking some very basic needs and many of those have been addressed in
the latest release. We even paid for the development of some of those
enhancements. In general Nuxeo DAM is fairly simple, but that's all that we
(and I suspect many museums) need. We need it to be able to handle and
preview media files and relate them to our institution. I'm not entirely
sure what the effort would be and if much additional work would be required.
That's why I reached out. I'll continue to investigate this and come back
with progress I might have.

• Charlie

From: Chris Hoffman chris.hoffman@berkeley.edu
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:39:36 -0800
To: Charles Moad cmoad@imamuseum.org
Cc: "talk@lists.collectionspace.org" talk@lists.collectionspace.org
Subject: Re: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

Hi Charlie,

At UC Berkeley, we have a very strong need to connect collections management
and digital assetmanagement functions in the way you describe.  The Nuxeo
DAM has seemed like a good way to go, but we haven't really experimented
with it here.  What's your experience been like?  Anyway, we'll happily
endorsethis too.  And if it's something that looks like it needs another
grant-funded project to do right, maybe we could get our institutions to
partner on something.  Just thinking out loud...

Thanks,

Chris

On Jan 4, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Charlie Moad wrote:

Thanks for following up Patrick. I'll rally my friends. I wouldn't expect a
CollectionSpace tab in Nuxeo CAP anytime soon either, but it would be pretty
powerful to have a single repository for the sole purpose of relating
documents to collection objects, exhibitions, etc.

Keep up the good work,

Charlie

From: Patrick Schmitz pschmitz@berkeley.edu
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 10:33:48 -0800
To: Charles Moad cmoad@imamuseum.org, talk@lists.collectionspace.org
Subject: RE: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

Hi Charlie -

This is something we would really like to investigate, as many folks have
expressed at least some interest in this. We have also been assured by the
Nuxeo folks that this should be possible. At this point, it is mostly a
matter of resources and priorities. If the community rallies support for
this as an essential integration, we should be able to find time in the
Phase 3 project to investigate it.

Note that we are otherwise interested in getting the DM working as a
diagnostic and support tool, and to aid with import/export workflows. As
such, there may be some basic investigation (not necessarily including
DAM/CSpace coordination) in the near term.

I doubt very much that CSpace will appear as a tab in the Nuxeo UI any time
soon, as this is not ause-case that anyone (else) has yet requested. Am not
ruling it out, just giving my impression of the current project priorities,
in response to yourquestion on a related thread.

Thanks for the question -

Patrick

From: talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org
[mailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Moad
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 6:18 AM
To: talk@lists.collectionspace.org
Subject: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

What is the feasibility of setting up a single repository running the new
Nuxeo CAP 5.5 (DM + DAM specifically) and CollectionSpace 2.0 in a single
repository? I would like to be able to relate documents to works in our
collection. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Charlie

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies
of the original message.

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies
of the original message.

Talk mailing list
Talk@lists.collectionspace.org
http://lists.collectionspace.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_lists.collectionspace
.org

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies
of the original message.

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies
of the original message.

It would help to know if someone could express what would be involved in this process. It seems like it could be really close if it is just a matter of exposing the CS doc types in the DM interface. What are the complicating factors beyond that?

• Charlie

From: Nate Solas <nate.solas@walkerart.orgmailto:nate.solas@walkerart.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:52:38 -0600
To: Richard Millet <richard.millet@berkeley.edumailto:richard.millet@berkeley.edu>
Cc: Charles Moad <cmoad@imamuseum.orgmailto:cmoad@imamuseum.org>, <talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk@lists.collectionspace.org>
Subject: Re: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

I'd like to +1 a raised priority for this, but I'm not entirely sure what to recommend bumping. For us, and I suspect most of the current implementers, the multi-tenant service isn't as big an issue, but I know it's core to the long-term sustainability of the software.

It seems like there might be some room for this work in the 2.3 roadmap? I don't know how big a chunk the Location and Movement rewrite is.

Thanks for considering it. This would be huge for us, and it sounds like there is a lot of support out there.
Nate

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Richard Millet <richard.millet@berkeley.edumailto:richard.millet@berkeley.edu> wrote:
Charlie,

Thanks for experimenting with this.  One of our known tasks is to ensure that CollectionSpace can co-exist with Nuxeo’s DM and DAM applications.  Unfortunately, this work is not currently scheduled to happen anytime soon.  However, we understand the value of CollectionSpace being able to co-exist with Nuxeo’s applications.  If you feel we need to make this work a higher priority, please review the current release roadmaps and see how this work compares to what we have planned.  If you decide this work is more important, let us know and we can try to raise its priority.

-Richard

From: talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org [mailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Moad
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 7:14 PM
To: Christopher Pott; Chris Hoffman
Cc: talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk@lists.collectionspace.org

Subject: Re: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

I haven't had much time, but I took a naïve attempt at installing CS+DM+DAM all on the same postgres database. I am attaching two screenshots of the results. There are only a few errors during the DM+DAM startup, but things seem to run well enough. There appears to be promise. Two glaring things are that the "default-domain" that is normally part of the top-level of DM is missing. Looking inside each CS domain shows a workspace for each type, but they are empty. I would hope that it is only a matter of adding the proper Nuxeo extensions to expose these types to the DM interface. Any insight the development team has would be interesting. In the mean time I believe we are going to relate our DM documents to placeholders documents. The prospect of creating relationship between DM documents and CS ones feels close though.

• Charlie

From: Christopher Pott <Christopher.Pott@smk.dkmailto:Christopher.Pott@smk.dk>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:35:34 +0100
To: Charles Moad <cmoad@imamuseum.orgmailto:cmoad@imamuseum.org>, Chris Hoffman <chris.hoffman@berkeley.edumailto:chris.hoffman@berkeley.edu>
Cc: <talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk@lists.collectionspace.org>
Subject: SV: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

Hi Charlie,

Here at SMK we’re also in the process of defining our requirements for a DAM solution and as a part of this process have also tested an earlier Nuxeo DAM version. It was basic, but seemed fast and stable in the short period we tested it. Relating texts and documents to artworks is also a pressing use case for us – although Ihope we can integrate this into CollectionSpace either through the Media Handling procedure by supporting some new document types (pdf, doc, html etc.) or possibly even by creating a new procedure for handling related texts. In any case I look forward to following your investigations.

Regards,
(another) Chris

Fra: talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org [mailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org] På vegne af Charlie Moad
Sendt: 4. januar 2012 22:48
Til: Chris Hoffman
Cc: talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk@lists.collectionspace.org
Emne: Re: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

At the IMA we are just in the process of rolling out the new DAM software based on 5.5. We have been using DM with a select group of staff members for several months now with decent success. We found the previous versions of DAM lacking some very basic needs and many of those have been addressed in the latest release. We even paid for the development of some of those enhancements. In general Nuxeo DAM is fairly simple, but that's all that we (and I suspect many museums) need. We need it to be able to handle and preview media files and relate them to our institution. I'm not entirely sure what the effort would be and if much additional work would be required. That's why I reached out. I'll continue to investigate this and come back with progress I might have.

• Charlie

From: Chris Hoffman <chris.hoffman@berkeley.edumailto:chris.hoffman@berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:39:36 -0800
To: Charles Moad <cmoad@imamuseum.orgmailto:cmoad@imamuseum.org>
Cc: "talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk@lists.collectionspace.org" <talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk@lists.collectionspace.org>
Subject: Re: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

Hi Charlie,

At UC Berkeley, we have a very strong need to connect collections management and digital assetmanagement functions in the way you describe.  The Nuxeo DAM has seemed like a good way to go, but we haven't really experimented with it here.  What's your experience been like?  Anyway, we'll happily endorsethis too.  And if it's something that looks like it needs another grant-funded project to do right, maybe we could get our institutions to partner on something.  Just thinking out loud...

Thanks,
Chris

On Jan 4, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Charlie Moad wrote:

Thanks for following up Patrick. I'll rally my friends. I wouldn't expect a CollectionSpace tab in Nuxeo CAP anytime soon either, but it would be pretty powerful to have a single repository for the sole purpose of relating documents to collection objects, exhibitions, etc.

Keep up the good work,
Charlie

From: Patrick Schmitz <pschmitz@berkeley.edumailto:pschmitz@berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 10:33:48 -0800
To: Charles Moad <cmoad@imamuseum.orgmailto:cmoad@imamuseum.org>, <talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk@lists.collectionspace.org>
Subject: RE: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS

Hi Charlie -

This is something we would really like to investigate, as many folks have expressed at least some interest in this. We have also been assured by the Nuxeo folks that this should be possible. At this point, it is mostly a matter of resources and priorities. If the community rallies support for this as an essential integration, we should be able to find time in the Phase 3 project to investigate it.

Note that we are otherwise interested in getting the DM working as a diagnostic and support tool, and to aid with import/export workflows. As such, there may be some basic investigation (not necessarily including DAM/CSpace coordination) in the near term.

I doubt very much that CSpace will appear as a tab in the Nuxeo UI any time soon, as this is not ause-case that anyone (else) has yet requested. Am not ruling it out, just giving my impression of the current project priorities, in response to yourquestion on a related thread.

Thanks for the question -

Patrick

From: talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org [mailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Moad
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 6:18 AM
To: talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:talk@lists.collectionspace.org
Subject: [Talk] CAP 5.5 + CS
What is the feasibility of setting up a single repository running the new Nuxeo CAP 5.5 (DM + DAM specifically) and CollectionSpace 2.0 in a single repository? I would like to be able to relate documents to works in our collection. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Charlie

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Talk mailing list
Talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:Talk@lists.collectionspace.org
http://lists.collectionspace.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_lists.collectionspace.org

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Talk mailing list
Talk@lists.collectionspace.orgmailto:Talk@lists.collectionspace.org
http://lists.collectionspace.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_lists.collectionspace.org

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Charlie Moad by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.