time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

HP 10811A unusual appearance

MH
Matt Huszagh
Tue, Aug 23, 2022 4:22 AM

Hi,

I purchased a few standalone HP 10811As. One of them piqued my curiosity
a bit because it doesn't look like the other 10811s I'd seen before. In
particular, it doesn't have a full serial number and the PCBs don't use
green solder mask.

Any idea what might account for these differences? Was this perhaps an
early unit? I'm not too concerned about it; just curious.

I did a basic test of the operation and it seemed totally normal:
typical oven and oscillator current draw and warm up time. Normal levels
for oscillator output. I haven't done any more rigorous tests, such as
for phase noise or aging performance.

Thanks
Matt

Hi, I purchased a few standalone HP 10811As. One of them piqued my curiosity a bit because it doesn't look like the other 10811s I'd seen before. In particular, it doesn't have a full serial number and the PCBs don't use green solder mask. Any idea what might account for these differences? Was this perhaps an early unit? I'm not too concerned about it; just curious. I did a basic test of the operation and it seemed totally normal: typical oven and oscillator current draw and warm up time. Normal levels for oscillator output. I haven't done any more rigorous tests, such as for phase noise or aging performance. Thanks Matt
R(
Richard (Rick) Karlquist
Tue, Aug 23, 2022 2:18 PM

The original 10811's used so-called "sculptured" flex circuits.
That was a disaster and then they changed to conventional ones.
I don't know if any of the sculptured ones shipped.  If they
did, it might explain why the boards look different.  It
could be that no sculptured versions officially shipped, but
you have a prototype that escaped from the mother ship
without a serial number.

Rick N6RK

On 8/22/2022 9:22 PM, Matt Huszagh via time-nuts wrote:

Hi,

I purchased a few standalone HP 10811As. One of them piqued my curiosity
a bit because it doesn't look like the other 10811s I'd seen before. In
particular, it doesn't have a full serial number and the PCBs don't use
green solder mask.

Any idea what might account for these differences? Was this perhaps an
early unit? I'm not too concerned about it; just curious.

I did a basic test of the operation and it seemed totally normal:
typical oven and oscillator current draw and warm up time. Normal levels
for oscillator output. I haven't done any more rigorous tests, such as
for phase noise or aging performance.

Thanks
Matt


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

The original 10811's used so-called "sculptured" flex circuits. That was a disaster and then they changed to conventional ones. I don't know if any of the sculptured ones shipped. If they did, it might explain why the boards look different. It could be that no sculptured versions officially shipped, but you have a prototype that escaped from the mother ship without a serial number. Rick N6RK On 8/22/2022 9:22 PM, Matt Huszagh via time-nuts wrote: > Hi, > > I purchased a few standalone HP 10811As. One of them piqued my curiosity > a bit because it doesn't look like the other 10811s I'd seen before. In > particular, it doesn't have a full serial number and the PCBs don't use > green solder mask. > > Any idea what might account for these differences? Was this perhaps an > early unit? I'm not too concerned about it; just curious. > > I did a basic test of the operation and it seemed totally normal: > typical oven and oscillator current draw and warm up time. Normal levels > for oscillator output. I haven't done any more rigorous tests, such as > for phase noise or aging performance. > > Thanks > Matt > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
LJ
Lux, Jim
Tue, Aug 23, 2022 2:55 PM

On 8/23/22 7:18 AM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist via time-nuts wrote:

The original 10811's used so-called "sculptured" flex circuits.
That was a disaster and then they changed to conventional ones.
I don't know if any of the sculptured ones shipped.  If they
did, it might explain why the boards look different.  It
could be that no sculptured versions officially shipped, but
you have a prototype that escaped from the mother ship
without a serial number.

At JPL, we dispose of all kinds of "e-waste" in large bins. So if you
had a bunch of lab breadboards that have long outlived their usefulness
then they go in the bin.  There are people who buy the bins (I think
they're auctioned off) and sort through them, or just grind them up and
extract the metals. The vast majority of whats in there is stuff like
old cables that have cracking insulation, boxes of 30 year old parts of
dubious quality and provenance. I could easily see HP working
similarly.   For what it's worth, at JPL, it's against the rules for
employees to dumpster dive - There's apparently a govt originated policy
on this, to reduce the possibility of the equivalent of a restaurant
worker throwing away a $400 whole fish, to be rescued later by a
confederate.

I used to have tubes and trays of some IC or component in my desk or on
a shelf in a cabinet in a lab, where we needed half a dozen or so, and
we bought 10-20 to have spares.  We never did work out a good way to
keep track of "lab spares for breadboarding", and periodically (every 10
years or so), they'd go on a "let's clean out the cabinets" movement,
and we'd purge the stuff that a)was clearly degraded; b)we had way too
many of (we had cabinets full of weird shaped brackets to mount
something in 19" racks, but nobody could remember what it was they were
for); c) components that were supplied as part of an experimental
contract (vendor goes and makes 30 pieces of something, we test 3, and
they don't work, so the box just goes on the shelf).  As people retire,
the knowledge of "what is that iridited box from a company that doesn't
exist any more?" goes away, and stuff winds up in e-waste.  Or the data
sheets were purged in an earlier activity, so you know what it is, but
no idea how to use it.

OTOH, there are regular calls at amateur organizations like San
Bernardino Microwave Society to give a new home to a storage container
full of 30+ year old stuff accumulated over a life time.  So in that
case, the mystery box just gets a new home, until it gets readopted
again. Typically, the stuff moves when a particular storage reaches it's
physical limit of capacity (or, "you need to get rid of that shed,
because we're building a pool" kind of events).

On 8/23/22 7:18 AM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist via time-nuts wrote: > The original 10811's used so-called "sculptured" flex circuits. > That was a disaster and then they changed to conventional ones. > I don't know if any of the sculptured ones shipped.  If they > did, it might explain why the boards look different.  It > could be that no sculptured versions officially shipped, but > you have a prototype that escaped from the mother ship > without a serial number. At JPL, we dispose of all kinds of "e-waste" in large bins. So if you had a bunch of lab breadboards that have long outlived their usefulness then they go in the bin.  There are people who buy the bins (I think they're auctioned off) and sort through them, or just grind them up and extract the metals. The vast majority of whats in there is stuff like old cables that have cracking insulation, boxes of 30 year old parts of dubious quality and provenance. I could easily see HP working similarly.   For what it's worth, at JPL, it's against the rules for employees to dumpster dive - There's apparently a govt originated policy on this, to reduce the possibility of the equivalent of a restaurant worker throwing away a $400 whole fish, to be rescued later by a confederate. I used to have tubes and trays of some IC or component in my desk or on a shelf in a cabinet in a lab, where we needed half a dozen or so, and we bought 10-20 to have spares.  We never did work out a good way to keep track of "lab spares for breadboarding", and periodically (every 10 years or so), they'd go on a "let's clean out the cabinets" movement, and we'd purge the stuff that a)was clearly degraded; b)we had way too many of (we had cabinets full of weird shaped brackets to mount something in 19" racks, but nobody could remember what it was they were for); c) components that were supplied as part of an experimental contract (vendor goes and makes 30 pieces of something, we test 3, and they don't work, so the box just goes on the shelf).  As people retire, the knowledge of "what is that iridited box from a company that doesn't exist any more?" goes away, and stuff winds up in e-waste.  Or the data sheets were purged in an earlier activity, so you know what it is, but no idea how to use it. OTOH, there are regular calls at amateur organizations like San Bernardino Microwave Society to give a new home to a storage container full of 30+ year old stuff accumulated over a life time.  So in that case, the mystery box just gets a new home, until it gets readopted again. Typically, the stuff moves when a particular storage reaches it's physical limit of capacity (or, "you need to get rid of that shed, because we're building a pool" kind of events).
MH
Matt Huszagh
Tue, Aug 23, 2022 3:08 PM

"Richard (Rick) Karlquist" richard@karlquist.com writes:

The original 10811's used so-called "sculptured" flex circuits.
That was a disaster and then they changed to conventional ones.
I don't know if any of the sculptured ones shipped.  If they
did, it might explain why the boards look different.  It
could be that no sculptured versions officially shipped, but
you have a prototype that escaped from the mother ship
without a serial number.

Thanks Rick. Was it a disaster in the sense of reliability?

Matt

"Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com> writes: > The original 10811's used so-called "sculptured" flex circuits. > That was a disaster and then they changed to conventional ones. > I don't know if any of the sculptured ones shipped. If they > did, it might explain why the boards look different. It > could be that no sculptured versions officially shipped, but > you have a prototype that escaped from the mother ship > without a serial number. Thanks Rick. Was it a disaster in the sense of reliability? Matt
BK
Bob kb8tq
Tue, Aug 23, 2022 5:53 PM

Hi

There are at least two very different 10811 PCB’s out in the wild
in quantity. I don’t have access to the “stockpile” right now so I can’t
say how the one in the picture compares to the commonly seen
varieties.

Bob

On Aug 22, 2022, at 8:22 PM, Matt Huszagh via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com wrote:

Hi,

I purchased a few standalone HP 10811As. One of them piqued my curiosity
a bit because it doesn't look like the other 10811s I'd seen before. In
particular, it doesn't have a full serial number and the PCBs don't use
green solder mask.

Any idea what might account for these differences? Was this perhaps an
early unit? I'm not too concerned about it; just curious.

I did a basic test of the operation and it seemed totally normal:
typical oven and oscillator current draw and warm up time. Normal levels
for oscillator output. I haven't done any more rigorous tests, such as
for phase noise or aging performance.

Thanks
Matt

<img1906.jpg><img1907.jpg>_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

Hi There are at least two *very* different 10811 PCB’s out in the wild in quantity. I don’t have access to the “stockpile” right now so I can’t say how the one in the picture compares to the commonly seen varieties. Bob > On Aug 22, 2022, at 8:22 PM, Matt Huszagh via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I purchased a few standalone HP 10811As. One of them piqued my curiosity > a bit because it doesn't look like the other 10811s I'd seen before. In > particular, it doesn't have a full serial number and the PCBs don't use > green solder mask. > > Any idea what might account for these differences? Was this perhaps an > early unit? I'm not too concerned about it; just curious. > > I did a basic test of the operation and it seemed totally normal: > typical oven and oscillator current draw and warm up time. Normal levels > for oscillator output. I haven't done any more rigorous tests, such as > for phase noise or aging performance. > > Thanks > Matt > > <img1906.jpg><img1907.jpg>_______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
RK
Richard Karlquist
Tue, Aug 23, 2022 6:37 PM

I never knew exactly what the problem was, but I didn't get the

impression it was reliability.  That would imply that they shipped

OK and then died in the field.  I never worked on the 10811 myself,

but sat near the ME who would yell at Buckbee Mears (the mfr

of these things) on his phone all the time.  It wasn't advisable to

actually inquire about this problem because that would rile up the

ME.

Rick


On 2022-08-23 08:08, Matt Huszagh wrote:

Thanks Rick. Was it a disaster in the sense of reliability?

Matt

I never knew exactly what the problem was, but I didn't get the impression it was reliability. That would imply that they shipped OK and then died in the field. I never worked on the 10811 myself, but sat near the ME who would yell at Buckbee Mears (the mfr of these things) on his phone all the time. It wasn't advisable to actually inquire about this problem because that would rile up the ME. Rick --- On 2022-08-23 08:08, Matt Huszagh wrote: > Thanks Rick. Was it a disaster in the sense of reliability? > > Matt
MH
Matt Huszagh
Wed, Aug 24, 2022 2:13 PM

Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org writes:

There are at least two very different 10811 PCB’s out in the wild
in quantity. I don’t have access to the “stockpile” right now so I can’t
say how the one in the picture compares to the commonly seen
varieties.

If you do get access at some point and it's not too much trouble to
check, I'd be interested to know more about this. Do you know the reason
for having two versions? Is it simply that one was an earlier design and
the other replaced it?

Thanks
Matt

Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> writes: > There are at least two *very* different 10811 PCB’s out in the wild > in quantity. I don’t have access to the “stockpile” right now so I can’t > say how the one in the picture compares to the commonly seen > varieties. If you do get access at some point and it's not too much trouble to check, I'd be interested to know more about this. Do you know the reason for having two versions? Is it simply that one was an earlier design and the other replaced it? Thanks Matt
RK
Richard Karlquist
Wed, Aug 24, 2022 3:44 PM

The only two "very different" PCB's I am aware of are the

original sculptured flex circuit and the conventional flex

circuit that superceded it early on, due to problems with

the sculptured flex vendor, as I have previously stated.


Rick Karlquist
N6RK

On 2022-08-24 07:13, Matt Huszagh via time-nuts wrote:

Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org writes:

There are at least two very different 10811 PCB's out in the wild
in quantity. I don't have access to the "stockpile" right now so I can't
say how the one in the picture compares to the commonly seen
varieties.

If you do get access at some point and it's not too much trouble to
check, I'd be interested to know more about this. Do you know the reason
for having two versions? Is it simply that one was an earlier design and
the other replaced it?

Thanks
Matt


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

The only two "very different" PCB's I am aware of are the original sculptured flex circuit and the conventional flex circuit that superceded it early on, due to problems with the sculptured flex vendor, as I have previously stated. --- Rick Karlquist N6RK On 2022-08-24 07:13, Matt Huszagh via time-nuts wrote: > Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> writes: > >> There are at least two *very* different 10811 PCB's out in the wild >> in quantity. I don't have access to the "stockpile" right now so I can't >> say how the one in the picture compares to the commonly seen >> varieties. > > If you do get access at some point and it's not too much trouble to > check, I'd be interested to know more about this. Do you know the reason > for having two versions? Is it simply that one was an earlier design and > the other replaced it? > > Thanks > Matt > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
BK
Bob kb8tq
Wed, Aug 24, 2022 3:45 PM

Hi

I should have access to the supply dump some time in November.
My take was that they started off with a more exotic PCB approach
early on and simplified things a few years later. If I remember correctly
the solder mask changed a bit at the change over as well.

Bob

On Aug 24, 2022, at 6:13 AM, Matt Huszagh huszaghmatt@gmail.com wrote:

Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org writes:

There are at least two very different 10811 PCB’s out in the wild
in quantity. I don’t have access to the “stockpile” right now so I can’t
say how the one in the picture compares to the commonly seen
varieties.

If you do get access at some point and it's not too much trouble to
check, I'd be interested to know more about this. Do you know the reason
for having two versions? Is it simply that one was an earlier design and
the other replaced it?

Thanks
Matt

Hi I should have access to the supply dump some time in November. My take was that they started off with a more exotic PCB approach early on and simplified things a few years later. If I remember correctly the solder mask changed a bit at the change over as well. Bob > On Aug 24, 2022, at 6:13 AM, Matt Huszagh <huszaghmatt@gmail.com> wrote: > > Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> writes: > >> There are at least two *very* different 10811 PCB’s out in the wild >> in quantity. I don’t have access to the “stockpile” right now so I can’t >> say how the one in the picture compares to the commonly seen >> varieties. > > If you do get access at some point and it's not too much trouble to > check, I'd be interested to know more about this. Do you know the reason > for having two versions? Is it simply that one was an earlier design and > the other replaced it? > > Thanks > Matt
AG
Adrian Godwin
Wed, Aug 24, 2022 8:24 PM

If it's not too off-topic, what is a 'sculptured' flex circuit ?
The 10811 I've taken apart has a 2D-shaped and folded flex circuit that I'd
consider 'conventional' - does a sculptured one have some integral 3D
shaping ?

On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 7:46 PM Bob kb8tq via time-nuts <
time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote:

Hi

I should have access to the supply dump some time in November.
My take was that they started off with a more exotic PCB approach
early on and simplified things a few years later. If I remember correctly
the solder mask changed a bit at the change over as well.

Bob

On Aug 24, 2022, at 6:13 AM, Matt Huszagh huszaghmatt@gmail.com wrote:

Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org writes:

There are at least two very different 10811 PCB’s out in the wild
in quantity. I don’t have access to the “stockpile” right now so I can’t
say how the one in the picture compares to the commonly seen
varieties.

If you do get access at some point and it's not too much trouble to
check, I'd be interested to know more about this. Do you know the reason
for having two versions? Is it simply that one was an earlier design and
the other replaced it?

Thanks
Matt


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

If it's not too off-topic, what is a 'sculptured' flex circuit ? The 10811 I've taken apart has a 2D-shaped and folded flex circuit that I'd consider 'conventional' - does a sculptured one have some integral 3D shaping ? On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 7:46 PM Bob kb8tq via time-nuts < time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: > Hi > > I should have access to the supply dump some time in November. > My take was that they started off with a more exotic PCB approach > early on and simplified things a few years later. If I remember correctly > the solder mask changed a bit at the change over as well. > > Bob > > > On Aug 24, 2022, at 6:13 AM, Matt Huszagh <huszaghmatt@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> writes: > > > >> There are at least two *very* different 10811 PCB’s out in the wild > >> in quantity. I don’t have access to the “stockpile” right now so I can’t > >> say how the one in the picture compares to the commonly seen > >> varieties. > > > > If you do get access at some point and it's not too much trouble to > > check, I'd be interested to know more about this. Do you know the reason > > for having two versions? Is it simply that one was an earlier design and > > the other replaced it? > > > > Thanks > > Matt > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com