On Wednesday I estimated 1000 there. Best, Frank Mantlik Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 5, 2022, at 1:24 PM, Cyndi Fazekas wrote: > > There were a couple long-tailed ducks @ Long Beach Stratford about 2 hours ago. > > Sorry for the late notice.

raw=1> I estimated the roundness, r, by finding an object that fitted a corner neatly; this pad had a radius of about 3mm: https://www.dropbox.com/s/n6zjhnv8d8r0019/RoundnessEstimate.jpg?dl=0httraw=1 P.S.

I estimated at least 500 birds, could have been over 1,000 over more than an hour. A wonderful spectacle! Sarah Faulkner, Collinsville > On 08/27/2022 5:32 PM Bianca Beland via CTBirds wrote: > > > Anyone in Canton area - go to Simmonds and Dowd!

. -- "I estimate there's a world market for about five computers." - Thomas J Watson, Chairman of IBM Please reply to the list; please *don't* CC me.

UPS estimate is $220 to most places CONUS. If you want one or two, please send an email to me j at acoxu dot com. Let's keep the traffic off the group. Thank you! Jim Emacs!

He is telling you this because he thinks he can do it cheaper than your estimates from the boatyard you chose. You will probably want to have another specific survey after these repairs, done by the seller, are finished.

If you intend to operate your boat at displacement speeds (that is, speeds below those where the hull rises up and rides on top of the water), then 90 to 100 horsepower sounds like a good initial estimate. I have a chart which estimates the horsepower required, based on the boat's length and weight, and the speed desired.

A conservative way to estimate frontal area is to multiply the beam by the height of the superstructure. An even simpler way is to multiply the beam by 3/4 of the beam. By this calculation, my Willard has about 100 sq. ft. of area. A Nordhavn 40 has 160 sq. ft. of area. A Nordhavn 47 has about 195 sq. ft. of area. A Nordhavn 72 has 330 sq.ft. of area.

The problem is the C/No (Signal Power/ Noise density) estimated. I am comparing the C/No estimated with the USRP2 and the C/No estimated with a GPS receiver. Both used the same antenna. The point is with the USRP2 I measure 17dB less than with the normal GPS.

As you now observe on two frequencies, you can now on the difference between the measures estimate how much the difference of frequency picked up at TEC, thus one can separate out the TEC effect. By estimating TEX from those observations, the ionspheric effect can be removed from both observations.