Yet I estimated it would take at least a year. So....there are a lot of great projects waiting out there! Regards, Bob Austin

So you need to make an estimate of how much you'll use and thus how much it will be running, before you can come up with wattage estimates.

between the genset and the main, the one you can probably estimate in the most accurate way is the genset. too many variables with the engine whether load, bottom conditions, etc... You should be able to get reasonably accurate number for the genset from wstbk...

I think I read that Deka was being conservative in their estimates when their AGM's were new, and thus the 300 estimate. Seems to me it should have been updated by now. BTW, I have Optima starting batteries (also AGM), same age. They also have many times 300 cycles on them, and work like new.

An estimated 4,000 > gallons of fuel and lube oil were released, with the majority consumed > during the fire. The value of Dock B and the 35 vessels destroyed was > estimated at more than $500,000.

Here's the details: When: August 27 (Tuesday) Where: Pub Aqui (http://www.pub-aqui.de/) If you already know you're coming, please drop me a note off-list, so we can make an estimate for reservations.

The reason we want to remove the GPS antenna is the following: we need the time of the USRPs to be synchronized (with precision that can be as bad as microseconds), but we want the oscillators to be free-running (we're building a TDOA estimation architecture that also estimates the LO offsets and LO skew).

There's also another well known old trick or two to get a good estimate at very low hardware cost…rather than me write it up just take a look at this: http://www.dspguru.com/dsp/tricks/magnitude-estimator w.r.t your question about bit weighting, its very unusual to see well designed fixed point data path use a representation of +1 >= x >= -1 because it requires

Hello, Time-Nutters-- Bruce said: > A statement of accuracy is of little value unless you also give: > 1) An estimate of the accuracy of standard used for comparison. > 2) An estimate of the random and systematic errors in the comparison > 3) Some details of the comparison method.

It is *very* easy to over estimate how fast things converge. Bob > On Apr 26, 2018, at 5:28 PM, Oleg Skydan wrote: > > From: "Hal Murray" > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 10:28 PM > >> Is there a term for what I think you are doing?